Chapter 6
Making “politics” relevant
How constituents and a member of parliament raise political topics at constituency surgeries
This paper investigates an area of political discourse that has hitherto existed in an analytic “black box”: the constituency office. We focus on the interactions between ordinary British people as they engage directly in “political” discussions with their Member of Parliament. While the majority of surgery talk surrounds complaints about services, we focus on sequences of talk in which either citizens or the MP make “political” topics relevant. Eighty consultations were video-recorded, anonymised and transcribed, and the data analysed using conversation analysis. We found that MP-initiated political comments portray the government as aligned with constituents’ needs, whereas constituents use political comments largely to criticise the government. Constituents privilege the interactional contingencies over other issues. Overall, the paper contributes to our understanding of how constituents navigate interactional and political contingencies in interactions with their representative.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Method
- Analysis
- MP-raised political comments
- Constituents’ political comments
- Discussion and conclusion
-
Transcription key
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Ågren, Hanna, Matz Dahlberg, and Eva Mörk
2006 “
Do Politicians’ Preferences Correspond to Those of the Voters? An Investigation of Political Representation.”
Public Choice 130 (1–2): 137–162.
Arter, David
2011 “
The Michael Marsh Question: How Do Finns Do Constituency Service.”
Parliamentary Affairs 64 (1): 129–152.
Bavelas, Janet B., Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and Jennifer Mullett
1990 Equivocal communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Blidook, Kelly, and Matthew Kerby
2011 “
Constituency Influence on ‘Constituency Members’: The Adaptability of Roles to Electoral Realities in the Canadian Case.”
The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 327–339.
Bull, Peter
2008 “
‘Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity’: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 333–344.
Butler, Patrick, and Neil Collins
2001 “
Payment on Delivery: Recognising Constituency Service as Political Marketing.”
European Journal of Marketing 35 (9/10): 1026–1037.
Cain, Bruce E., John Ferejohn and Morris Fiorina
1987 The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clark, Colin, Paul Drew, and Trevor Pinch
2003 “
Managing Prospect-Affiliation and Rapport in Real-life Sales Encounters.”
Discourse Studies 5 (1): 5–31.
Clayman, Steven E.
2002 “
Sequence and Solidarity.”
Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity 19: 229–253.
Clayman, Steven E.
2010 “
Questions in Broadcast Journalism.” In
Why Do You Ask: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse ed. by
Alice Freed, and
Susan Ehrlich, 256–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002 “
Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan.”
Journal of Communication 52: 749–777.
Dalton, Russell J.
2000 “
Citizen Attitudes and Political Behaviour.”
Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 912–940.
Department of Work and Pensions UK
2014 The New State Pension. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 10 March 2015)
Drew, Paul
1998 “
Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 295–325.
Edwards, Derek
2005 “
Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.”
Discourse Studies 7 (1): 5–29.
Edwards, Derek, and Allesandra Fasulo
2006 “
‘To be honest’: Sequential Uses of Honesty Phrases in Talk-in-interaction.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (4): 343–376.
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter
1992 Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Edwards, Derek, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2007 “
Self-Help in Calls for Help with Problem Neighbors.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 9–32.
Ekström, Mats
2009 “
Announced Refusal to Answer: A Study of Norms and Accountability in Broadcast Political Interviews.”
Discourse Studies 11 (6): 681–702.
Ekström, Mats
2015 “
Young People’s Everyday Political Talk: A Social Achievement of Democratic Engagement.”
Journal of Youth Studies 19 (1): 1–19.
Ekström, Mats, Göran Eriksson, Bengt Johansson, and Patrik Wikström
2013 “
Biased Interrogations?”
Journalism Studies 14 (3): 423–439.
Ekström, Mats, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Bengt Johansson, and Nicklas Håkansson
2015 “
Negotiating Politicians’ Responsibilities in News Interviews.”
Journalism Practice.
Eveland, William P. Jr., Alyssa C. Morey, and Myiah J. Hutchens
2011 “
Beyond Deliberation: New Directions in the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective.”
Journal of Communication 61: 1082–1103.
Fenno, Richard
1978 Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Gay, Oonagh
2005 “
MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies.”
The Political Quarterly 76 (1): 57–66.
Garfinkel, Harold
2002 Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks
1986 “
On Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” In
Ethnomethodological Studies of Work ed. by
Harold Garfinkel, 160–193. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hamilton, Mark A., and Paul J. Mineo
1998 “
A Framework for Understanding Equivocation.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17: 3–35.
Hansard Society
2015 Audit of Political Engagement No. 12. London: Hansard Society.
Hay, Colin
2007 Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heinemann, Trine
2009 “
Participation and Exclusion in Third Party Complaints.”
Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2435–2451.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter
2011 “
Designing the Recipient: Managing Advice Resistance in Institutional Settings.”
Social Psychology Quarterly 74 (2): 216–241.
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman
2013 “
The Changing Tenor of Questioning over Time: Tracking a Question Form across US Presidential News Conferences, 1953–2000.”
Journalism Practice 7 (4): 481–501.
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch
1986 “
Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences.”
American Journal of Sociology 92: 110–157.
Holt, Elizabeth, and Paul Drew
1988 “
Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.”
Social Problems 35(4): 398–417.
House of Commons Modernisation Committee
2007 Revitalising the Chamber: The Role of the Backbench Member. First Report of Session 2006–07, 13 June. London: House of Commons.
House of Commons Information Office
2011 Members’ Pay, Pensions and Allowances. Factsheet M5 Members Series July 2011. London: House of Commons.
Jackson, Nigel, and Darren Lilleker
2011 “
Microblogging, Constituency Service, and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter.”
The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (1): 86–105.
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “
On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson, and
John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee
1981 “
Managing the Problematic Convergence of a Troubles-Telling and a Service Encounter.”
Journal of Pragmatics 5 (5): 299–422.
Johnston, Ron, and Charles Pattie
2009 “
MPs’ Expenditure and General Election Campaigns: Do Incumbents Benefit from Contacting Their Constituents?”
Political Studies 57 (3): 580–591.
Korris, Matt
2011 A Year in the Life: From Member of Public to Member of Parliament. London: Hansard Society.
Le Lidec, Patrick
2009 “
French Deputies, Their Assistants and the Uses of Staff Appropriations: A Sociology of Political Work.”
Sociologie du travail 518: e117–e135.
Litchfield, Paul
2014 An Independent Review of the Work Capability Assessment – Year Five. United Kingdom: Williams Lea Group.
Llewellyn, Nick
2005 “
Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.”
Sociology 39 (4): 697–716.
Lusoli, Wainer, Stephen Ward, and Rachel Gibson
2006 “
(Re)connecting Politics? Parliament, the Public and the Internet.”
Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 24–42.
Miller, Wakken E., and Donald E. Stokes
1963 “
Constituency Influence in Congress.”
The American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.
Norris, Pippa
1997 “
The Puzzle of Constituency Service.”
The Journal of Legislative Studies 3 (2): 29–49.
Norton, Philip
1994 “
The Growth of the Constituency Role of the MP.”
Parliamentary Affairs 47 (4): 705–720.
Norton, Philip, and David M. Wood
1993 Back from Westminster: Constituency Service by British Members of Parliament. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “
Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In
Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis ed. by
J. Maxwell Atkinson, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
2010 “
Putting Aspiration into Words: ‘Laugh Particles’, Managing Descriptive Trouble and Modulating Action.”
Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1543–1555.
Rawlings, Richard
1990 “
The MP’s Complaints Service.”
The Modern Law Review 53 (1): 22–42.
Romaniuk, Tanya
2013 “
Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (2): 144–164.
Rosenblatt, Gemma
2006 A Year in the Life: From Member of Public to Member of Parliament. London: Hansard Society.
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “
Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.”
American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Oana Lup
2013 “
Seeking the Soul of Democracy: A Review of Recent Research into Citizens’ Political Talk Culture.”
Swiss Political Science Review 19 (4): 513–538.
Shaw, Chloe, Alexa Hepburn, and Jonathan Potter
2013 “
Having the Last Laugh: On Post-completion Laughter Particles.” In
Studies of Laughter in Interaction ed. by
Philip Glenn, and
Elizabeth Holt, 91–106. London: Bloomsbury.
Sidnell, Jack
2010 Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers
(eds) 2013 The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Silverman, David, and Anssi Peräkylä
1990 “
AIDS Counseling: The Interactional Organisation of Talk about ‘Delicate’ Issues.”
Sociology of Health & Illness 12 (3): 293–318.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “
Mobilizing Response.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31.
Stokoe, Elizabeth
2010 “
‘Have you been married, or…?’: Eliciting and Accounting for Relationship Histories in Speed-dating Interaction.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (3): 260–282.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Alexa Hepburn
2005 “
‘You can hear a lot through the walls’: Noise Formulations in Neighbour Complaints.”
Discourse & Society 16 (5): 647–673.
Street, John
2004 “
Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Politics Representation.”
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (4): 435–452.
Traverso, Véronique
2009 “
The Dilemmas of Third-Party Complaints in Conversation Between Friends.”
Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2385–2399.
Vivyan, Nick, and Markus Wagner
2015 “
What Do Voters Want from Their Local MP?”
The Political Quarterly 86 (1): 33–40.
Wodak, Ruth
2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yiannakis, Diana E.
1981 “
The Grateful Electorate: Casework and Congressional Elections.”
American Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 568–580.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Hofstetter, Emily
2024.
A novice inquiry into unique adequacy.
Qualitative Research 24:1
► pp. 81 ff.
Kranert, Michael & Geraldine Horan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.