Cover not available
Part of
Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse
Edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 80] 2018
► pp. 235–258

Chapter 10
United we diverge

Politician Facebook responses to terror attacks

Editor
This chapter investigates what may be termed the responsive aspect of politics in critical situations where ordinary routines are challenged and unexpected events require a political response. Taking the deadly attack on a public meeting and the synagogue in Copenhagen, Denmark on 14 February 2015 as an empirical case, the chapter analyses responses from leading politicians on Facebook in the first days after the attacks. The analysis centres on the way in which the attacks are categorised and evaluated as well as on prevalent topoi and forms of dialogicality. The chapter concludes that the Facebook responses constitute a double articulation of overt unity and potential disagreement.
Keywords: responsive politics, Facebook, discourse analysis, terrorism, categorisation, topoi, timing, dialogicality, epideictic rhetoric
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Conceptualising responsive politics in critical situations
  • Method, research questions and data
  • Analysis
    • Categorisation
    • Evaluations
    • Topoi for political action
    • Dialogicality
  • Conclusion and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.10hor
References (44)
References
Billig, Michael. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L. 1997. “Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication.” Public Relations Review 23 (2): 177–186.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bor, Stephanie E. 2014. “Using Social Network Sites to Improve Communication Between Political Campaigns and Citizens in the 2012 Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 58(9): 1195–1213.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornscheuer, Lothar. 1976. Topik. Zur Struktur der gesellschaftlichen Einbildungskraft [On the Structure of Societal Imagination]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Anabela. 2005. “Representing the Politics of the Greenhouse effect: Discursive Strategies in the British Media.” Critical Discourse Studies 2 (1): 1–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2004. “Watching 11 September: The politics of Pity.” Discourse & Society 15(2–3): 185–198.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough.1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy. 1999. Ongoing Crisis Communication. Planning, Managing and Responding. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Condit, Celeste M. 1985. “The Functions of Epideictic: The Boston Massacre Orations as Examplar.” Communication Quarterly 33 (4): 284–299.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cottle, Simon. 2009a. Global Crisis Reporting. Journalism in the Global Age. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Global Crises in the News: Staging New Wars, Disasters, and Climate Change.” International Journal of Communication (3): 494–516.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 1987. “Metaphor, Euphemism and the Militarization of Language.” Current Research on Peace and Violence 10: 7–19.Google Scholar
De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Modh Don. (eds). 2013. Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives. (DAPSAC Series No. 52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn Sara, and Eli Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centered Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society 6(5): 757–774.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Frandsen, Finn, and Winnie Johansen. 2011. “The Study of Internal Crisis Communication: Towards an Integrative Framework.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 16 (4): 347–361.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten A. 2009. Authoritative Governance. Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Rebecca A., Andrew Smock, and Caleb T. Carr. 2015. “Face[book] Management: Self-Presentation of Political Views on Social Media.” Communication Studies. 66 (5): 549–568.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Robert L., and Dan O’Hair. 2008. “Terrorism: From the Eyes of the Beholder.” In Terrorism: Communication and Rhetorical Perspectives, ed. by Dan O’Hair, Robert L. Heath, Kevin J. Ayotte, and Gerald R. Ledlow, 17–41. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Charles F. 1963. “Some Consequences of Crisis Which Limit the Viability of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly (8): 61–82.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horsbøl, Anders. 2016. “Public Conceptions of Publicness in the Wake of the Copenhagen Killlings.” Discourse & Communication 10 (6): 458–478.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Klinger, Ulrike and Jakob Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media and Society 17(8): 1241–1257.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal. 2009. “Europe in Crisis.” Journalism Studies 10 (1): 18–35.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lean, Li Mei, Zuraidah Mohd Don, and Prasana Rosaline Fernandez. 2013. “Polarization in the Media Representation of Terrorism Crises. Transitivity and Lexical Choices in Malaysia’s Leading English Dailies.” In Discourse and Crisis. Critical Perspectives, ed. by Antoon De Rycker, and Zuraidah Mohd Don, 435–461. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per, and Srikant Sarangi (eds). 1998. “Discourse Across Professional Boundaries.” Special Issue of Text 18 (2) 143–318 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Machin, David, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2007. Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marin, Ion 2011. “The Coverage of Terrorism in the News”. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 3(2): 254–259.Google Scholar
Murphy, John M. 2003. “Our Mission and Our Moment: George W. Bush and September 11th.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6(4): 607–632.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2000. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Discourse Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rojecki, Andrew. 2005. “Media Discourse on Globalization and Terror.” Political Communication 22(1): 63–81.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1995. “Representing Social Action.” Discourse and Society 6 (1): 81–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. 2013. “Historische Diskurssemantik als Analyse von Argumentationstopoi” [Historical Discourse Semantic as Analysis of Argumentative Topoi]. In Linguistische Diskursanalyse: neue Perspektiven [Linguistic Discourse Analysis: New Perspectives], ed. by Dietrich Busse, and Wolfgang Teubert. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zompetti, Joseph P. 2006. “The Value of Topoi.” Argumentation 20 (1): 15–28.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Weizman, Elda & Zohar Livnat
2022. Dialogic meaning-making in political settings. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 731 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.