Chapter published in:
Migration and Media: Discourses about identities in crisis
Edited by Lorella Viola and Andreas Musolff
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 81] 2019
► pp. 137–160

Chapter 6
Gender, metaphor and migration in media representations

Discursive manipulations of the Other

This study discusses the gendered use of metaphors in the media texts collected from the U.S. and UK online media sources in the time span of two years (2015–2017) on the topic of the EU 2015 migration. Using Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz Group 2007), 88 media texts were analysed, following the criteria of topicality and gender. The findings reveal how the evoked frames of quantifiable and tradable objects, natural phenomena, crimes, war and terrorism contribute to suppressing positive emotions, related to empathy or compassion. It is also determined how the collective media voice is twisted by such underlying categories as competition, hierarchy and dominance that create an ideological opposition and relegate the collective migrant to the Other.
Keywords: gender, migration, media discourse, metaphor, evaluation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Migration, metaphor and evaluation
  • 3.Gender and the media
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Migration metaphor use from the male perspective
    • 5.2Migration metaphor use from the female perspective
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 07 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.81.07arc
References
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2013 “Metaphor of the global financial crisis after 2008: Reconstructing confidence by Arab and Western financial medias.” Sciences de la Société 88: 160–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S
(1999) Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International journal of cultural studies, 2(3), 329-347.Google Scholar
Boswell, Christina
2007 “Theorizing migration policy: Is there a third way?”. International migration review 41(1): 75–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, C
(2007) Migration control in Europe after 9/11: Explaining the absence of securitization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 589-610.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1990 The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990/2007 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2006 On language and sexual politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers Ian
1994 Migrancy, Culture and Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2006 “Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan, and Ennis, Timothy
2001 “A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting.” English for specific purposes 20 (3): 249–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cisneros, J. David
2008 “Contaminated communities: The metaphor of" immigrant as pollutant" in media representations of immigration. ” Rhetoric & public affairs 11(4): 569–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cozby, P. Chris
1973 “Self-disclosure: A literature review.” Psychological Bulletin (79): 73–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Julia
2003 “Expressions of gender: An analysis of pupils’ gendered discourse styles in small group classroom discussions.” Discourse & Society 14 (2): 115–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice
2005 Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Landtsheer, Christ’l
2009 “Collecting Political Meaning from the Count of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Joerg Zinken, 59–79. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J.
(2008) From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Massachusetts: MIT press.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
2007 Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio
2005 “The intellectuals.” In Contemporary Sociological Thought Vol. 49, ed. by Sean, P. Hier, 60–69. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Edinburgh and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Charles T., Donald, E. Stull
1987 “Gender and self-disclosure.” In Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy, ed. by Valerian J. Derlega, and John, H. Berg, 81–100. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2004 Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: a critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz, Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak
2017 “Mobilizing against the Other.” In Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, ed. by Monika Kopytowska, 57–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2003 Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1996 Moral Politics: how liberals and conservatives think. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Metaphor and war, again.” Alternet .Google Scholar
1991 “Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf.” Peace Research 23 (2/3): 25–32.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Lambkin, Brian
2012 Migration as a metaphor for metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 2(2): 180–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Migration as a metaphor for time: Past, present and future. Journal of Metaphor and the Social World 4 (2): 245–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M.
2006 “Discover the power of femininity!” analyzing global “power femininity” in local advertising.” Feminist Media Studies 6 (4): 505–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, Michelle. M.
2007 “Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis 1.” Critical Discourse Studies 4 (2): 141–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, Michelle. M., and Cheris Kramarae
2011 “Gender and power in discourse.” In Discourse Studies: a multidisciplinary introduction, ed. by Teun Van Dijk, 217–241. London: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Elvin T.
2009 “Gendered metaphors of women in power: the case of Hillary Clinton as madonna, unruly woman, bitch and witch.” In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, ed. by Kathleen Ahrens, 254–269. Palgrave Macmillan: London. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, Ana, Maria, R., and Orts Liopis
2010 “Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 300–313.Google Scholar
Lovering, Kathryn. M.
1995 “The bleeding body: Adolescents talk about menstruation.” In Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives, ed. by Sue Wilkinson, and Celia Kitzinger, 10–31. Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Maalej, Zouheir
2007 “Doing critical discourse analysis with the contemporary theory of metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor.” Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory, 132–158.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2006 “Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. ” Metaphor and Symbol 21(1): 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf.” Patterns of Prejudice 41(1): 21–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph J.
2008 The powers to lead. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payami, H., Zareparsi, S., Montee, K. R., Sexton, G. J., Kaye, J. A., Bird, T. D., Yu C. E., Wijsman E. M., Heston L. L.., Litrt M., Schellenberg, G. D.
1996 “Gender difference in apolipoprotein E-associated risk for familial Alzheimer disease: A possible clue to the higher incidence of Alzheimer disease in women.” American journal of human genetics 58(4): 803–811.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
2007 “MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22(1): 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, David L.
2013 Metaphor (Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics). Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Bryan R.
1995 “Socially expected durations and the economic adjustment of immigrants.” In The Economic Sociology of Immigration. Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship, ed. by Alejandro Portes, 42–87. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Rohrer, Tim, and Mary J. Vignone
2012 “The bankers go to Washington: Theory and method in conceptual metaphor analysis.” Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Franćaise (30): 5–38.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto
1999 “Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 191–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Nina G.
2009 A global perspective on transnational migration: Theorizing migration without methodological nationalism. In Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, working Paper (67), University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Silaski, Nadezda, and Tatjana Durovic
2010 “The conceptualisation of the global financial crisis via the ECONOMY IS a PERSON metaphor–a contrastive study of English and Serbian.” Facta Universitatis Series: Linguistics and Literature 8 (2): 129–139.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006 “Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy.” In Trends in Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Thomas, G., Stefan, 1–17. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2002 Gender, language and discourse. Routlegde: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman
1987 “Doing gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Naomi
1991 The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei, and Cheris Kramarae
2008 Feminist invitational collaboration in a digital age: Looking over disciplinary and national borders. Women and Language 31(2): 8–19.Google Scholar