Chapter 12
Preaching from a distant pulpit
The European migrant crisis seen through a New York Times editorial and reader comments
On 18 September 2015, in the midst of the greatest movement of refugees and migrants that Europe has seen since the Second World War, The New York Times published an editorial entitled “Europe should see refugees as a Boon, not as a Burden.” Not surprisingly, the article received well over 450 comments from readers reflecting the myriad of opinions about the complex issue of (European) migration and refugees. This paper is interested in the discourses about (European) migration that emerge from both the editorial and reader comments. Partially inspired by Text World Theory (Werth 1995), the study attempts to determine readers’ varying opinions about the issue and how this reflects and/or diverges from the view(s) presented by the editorial.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1CDA and media discourse
- 2.2New(s) media and the editorial
- 2.3Text World Theory
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Data analysis
- 4.1Editorial analysis
- 4.2Comment analysis
- 4.3Comment analysis
- 5.Discussion and preliminary conclusions
-
References
References
Baker, Paul, Hardie, A., and Toni McEnery
2006 A Glossary of Corpus Lingusitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press..
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, Allan
1991 The Language of News Media. London: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolívar, Adriana
1994 “
The Structure of Newspaper Editorials.” In
Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by
Malcolm Coulthard, 276–294. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonyadi, Alireza
2010 “
The Rhetorical Properties of the Schematic Structures of Newspaper Editorials: A Comparative Study of English and Persian Editorials.”
Discourse and Communication, 4 (4): 323–342.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, Michael S.
2014 “
(New) Participatory Framework on YouTube? Commenter Interaction in US Political Speeches.”
Journal of Pragmatics 72: 46–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, Michael S.
2016 “
From News to Comment: Tracing Text Trajectories in News Reporting about the Amanda Knox Trial.” In
Transmedia Crime Stories: The Trial of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito in the Globalised Media Sphere, ed. by
Gies, Lies, and
Maria Bortoluzzi, 139–164. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, Michael S.
2018 "
Critical Discourse Analysis and the Editorial 2.0: News Reception and User-Generated Comments in Discourses about (Im)migration."
Altre Modernità / Other Modernities, 10/2018: 1–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Browse, Sam
2016 “
‘This is not the End of the World’: Situating Metaphor in the Text-Worlds of the 2008 British Financial Crisis.” In
World building: Discourse in the mind, ed.
by Joanna Gavins, and
Ernestine Lahey, 183–201. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Editorial Board, The
2015, September 18 Europe Should See Refugees as a Boon, Not a Burden. The
New York Times. Retrieved July 23, 2017,
from [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd Edition ed.). Harlow: Longman.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “
Critical Discourse Analysis.” In
Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2), ed. by
Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita, and Marjut Johansson
2008 “
Hybridities in Political Media Discourse.”
Politics and Culture, 4. Retrieved from Politics and Culture:
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson
1986 “
Conditionals in Discourse: A Text-based Study from English.” In
On conditionals, ed. by
Cecilia E. Ford,
Elizabeth Closs Traugott,
Alice Ter Meulen,
Judy Snitzer Reilly, and
Charles A. Ferguson, 353–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Roger
1994 Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, Joanna
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, Joanna, and Ernestine Lahey
2016 “
World Building in Discourse.”
World Building: Discourse in the Mind, ed. by
Joanna Gavins, and
Ernestine Lahey, 1–13. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henry, Frances, and Carol Tator
2002 Discourses of Domination: Racial Bias in the Canadian English-language Press. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, Susan C.
2013 “
Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent.” In
Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by
Deborah Tannen, and
Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washinton, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2000 “
World Creation in Advertising Discourse.”
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 13: 67–88.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hodge, Roger, and Gunther Kress
1993 Language as Ideology (2nd Edition ed.). London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ihlebæk, Karoline Andrea, and Arne H. Krumsvik
2014 “
Editorial Power and Public Participation in Online Newspapers.”
Journalism 16 (4): 470–487.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, Marjut
2014 “
Reading Digital News: Participation Roles, Activities, and Positionings.”
Journal of Pragmatics 72 (2014): 31–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Johann Unger
2016 “
Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In
Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd Edition), ed. by
Ruth Wodak, and
Michael Meyer, 206–233. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Mahrou Zia
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Vit Suchomel
2014 “
The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.”
Lexicography, 1 (1): 7–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 “
Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participations.” In
Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by
Paul Drew, and
Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moon, Rosamund
1994 “
The Analysis of Fixed Expressions in Text.” In
Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by
Malcolm Coulthard, 117–135. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
New York Times, The
2017 What Kind of Comments are you Looking for. The New York
Times. Retrieved July 16 2017, from
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, John E.
2007 Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, John E., and James Stanyer
2011, “
Reader Opinion in the Digital Age: Tabloid and Broadsheet Newspaper Websites and the Exercise of Political Voice.”
Journalism 12 (8): 1–21.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tardy, Christine M.
2009 “
‘Press 1 for English’: Textual and Ideological Networks in a Newspaper Debate on US Language Policy.”
Discourse and Society 20 (2): 265–286.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Der Bom, Isabelle
2016 “
Speaker Enactors in Oral Narrative.” In
World Building: Discourse in the Mind, In
Joanna Gavins, and
Ernestine Lahey, 91–108. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1991 Racisim and the Press. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2001 “
Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity,
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by.” In
Ruth Wodak, and
Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, Patrick
2014 Discussions in the Comments Section: Factors Influencing Participation and Interactivity in Online Newspapers’ Reader Comments.
New Media and Society 16 (9): 941–957.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, Paul
1995 “
'World Enough, and Time': Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose.” In
Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, ed.
Peter Verdonk, and
Jean Jacques Weber, 181–206. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, Paul
1995a “
How to Build a World (in a Lot Less than Six Days and Using Only What’s in your Head).” In
New Essays on Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, ed. by
Keith Green, 49–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, Paul
1995b “
‘World Enough, and Time’: Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose.” In
Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, ed. by
Paul Verdonk, and
Jean Jacques Weber, 181–206. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth, and Paul Chilton
Ziegele, Marc, Timo Breiner, and Oliver Quiring
2014 “
What Creates Interactivity in Online News Discussions? An Exploratory Analysis of Discussion Factors in User Comments on News Items.”
Journal of Communication 64: 1111–1138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Stamatović, Milica Vuković
2022.
‘I would never…’: Deictic shift and moralizing in anti-immigration reader comments.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:2
► pp. 289 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.