References
Baker, Paul, Hardie, A., and Toni McEnery
2006A Glossary of Corpus Lingusitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1991The Language of News Media. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana
1994 “The Structure of Newspaper Editorials.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 276–294. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonyadi, Alireza
2010 “The Rhetorical Properties of the Schematic Structures of Newspaper Editorials: A Comparative Study of English and Persian Editorials.” Discourse and Communication, 4 (4): 323–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Michael S.
2014 “(New) Participatory Framework on YouTube? Commenter Interaction in US Political Speeches.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 46–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “From News to Comment: Tracing Text Trajectories in News Reporting about the Amanda Knox Trial.” In Transmedia Crime Stories: The Trial of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito in the Globalised Media Sphere, ed. by Gies, Lies, and Maria Bortoluzzi, 139–164. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 "Critical Discourse Analysis and the Editorial 2.0: News Reception and User-Generated Comments in Discourses about (Im)migration." Altre Modernità / Other Modernities, 10/2018: 1–22.Google Scholar
Browse, Sam
2016 “ ‘This is not the End of the World’: Situating Metaphor in the Text-Worlds of the 2008 British Financial Crisis.” In World building: Discourse in the mind, ed. by Joanna Gavins, and Ernestine Lahey, 183–201. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Editorial Board, The
2015, September 18Europe Should See Refugees as a Boon, Not a Burden. The New York Times. Retrieved July 23, 2017, from [URL]Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd Edition ed.). Harlow: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2), ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Marjut Johansson
2008 “Hybridities in Political Media Discourse.” Politics and Culture, 4. Retrieved from Politics and Culture: [URL]Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura
2014 “Between the Union and a United Ireland: Shifting Positions in Northern Ireland’s Post-Agreement Political Discourse.” In From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis Across Disciplines, ed. by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks, and Annamarie van Elfrinkhof, 207–224. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson
1986 “Conditionals in Discourse: A Text-based Study from English.” In On conditionals, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice Ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly, and Charles A. Ferguson, 353–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1994Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna
2007Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna, and Ernestine Lahey
2016 “World Building in Discourse.” World Building: Discourse in the Mind, ed. by Joanna Gavins, and Ernestine Lahey, 1–13. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Henry, Frances, and Carol Tator
2002Discourses of Domination: Racial Bias in the Canadian English-language Press. Toronto: Toronto University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2013 “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washinton, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2000 “World Creation in Advertising Discourse.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 13: 67–88.Google Scholar
Hodge, Roger, and Gunther Kress
1993Language as Ideology (2nd Edition ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ihlebæk, Karoline Andrea, and Arne H. Krumsvik
2014 “Editorial Power and Public Participation in Online Newspapers.” Journalism 16 (4): 470–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
2014 “Reading Digital News: Participation Roles, Activities, and Positionings.” Journal of Pragmatics 72 (2014): 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Johann Unger
2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd Edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 206–233. London: Sage.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Mahrou Zia
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Vit Suchomel
2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.” Lexicography, 1 (1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participations.” In Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew, and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
1994 “The Analysis of Fixed Expressions in Text.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 117–135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
New York Times, The
2017What Kind of Comments are you Looking for. The New York Times. Retrieved July 16 2017, from [URL]Google Scholar
Richardson, John E.
2007Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John E., and James Stanyer
2011, “Reader Opinion in the Digital Age: Tabloid and Broadsheet Newspaper Websites and the Exercise of Political Voice.” Journalism 12 (8): 1–21.Google Scholar
Tardy, Christine M.
2009 “ ‘Press 1 for English’: Textual and Ideological Networks in a Newspaper Debate on US Language Policy.” Discourse and Society 20 (2): 265–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Der Bom, Isabelle
2016 “Speaker Enactors in Oral Narrative.” In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, In Joanna Gavins, and Ernestine Lahey, 91–108. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1991Racisim and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by.” In Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Patrick
2014Discussions in the Comments Section: Factors Influencing Participation and Interactivity in Online Newspapers’ Reader Comments. New Media and Society 16 (9): 941–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, Paul
1995 “'World Enough, and Time': Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose.” In Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, ed. Peter Verdonk, and Jean Jacques Weber, 181–206. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1995a “How to Build a World (in a Lot Less than Six Days and Using Only What’s in your Head).” In New Essays on Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, ed. by Keith Green, 49–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995b “ ‘World Enough, and Time’: Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose.” In Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, ed. by Paul Verdonk, and Jean Jacques Weber, 181–206. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Paul Chilton
2005A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegele, Marc, Timo Breiner, and Oliver Quiring
2014 “What Creates Interactivity in Online News Discussions? An Exploratory Analysis of Discussion Factors in User Comments on News Items.” Journal of Communication 64: 1111–1138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Stamatović, Milica Vuković
2022. ‘I would never…’: Deictic shift and moralizing in anti-immigration reader comments. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:2  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.