References (35)
References
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie and Tony McEnery. 2006. A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouillaud, Christophe. 2001. “Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Le populisme et les démocraties.” Revue française de science politique 51 (1): 298–301.Google Scholar
Cappeau, Paul, and Catherine Schnedecker. 2014. “Gens, personne(s), individu(s): trois saisies de l’humain.” In 4ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, vol. 8, ed. by Judith Meinschaefer, Franck Neveu, Peter Blumenthal, Linda Hriba, and Annette Gerstenberg: 3027–3040. Berlin. [URL]Google Scholar
Cooren, François and Sergeiy Sandler. 2014. “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 24 (3): 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. 2006. “El discurso político entre oral y escrito.” In Usos sociales del lenguaje y aspectos psicolingüísticos. Perspectivas aplicadas, ed. by Joana Salazar Noguera, Marian Amengual Pizarro, and María Juan Garau: 123–130. Palma: Universitat de les Illes Balears Servei de Publicaciones i Intercanvi Científic.Google Scholar
Dezé, Alexandre. 2004. “Lectures critiques : Le populisme ou l’introuvable Cendrillon. Autour de quelques ouvrages récents.” Revue française de science politique 54 (1): 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Jean, and Françoise Dubois Charlier. 1996. “Collectifs d’êtres vivants.” Linx 34 (1): 125–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan. 2012. “Text trajectories, legal discourse and gendered inequalities.” Applied Linguistics Review 3 (1). 47–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hainsworth, Paul. 2006. “France Says No: The 29 May 2005 Referendum on the European Constitution.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 98–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heiden, Serge. 2010. “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” 389–398. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University. [URL]
Hermet, Guy. 2001. Les populismes dans le monde. Une histoire sociologique, XIXe-XXe siècle. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Higgins, Michael. 2013. “Governmentality, Populism and Empowerment: David Cameron’s Rhetoric of the Big Society.” In The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment, ed. by Richard Scullion, Roman Gerodimos, Daniel Jackson, and Darren Lilleker: 58–70. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Lutz. 1991. “Das ,Volk‘. Zur ideologischen Struktur eines unvermeidbaren Begriffs.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20 (3): 191–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubé, Nicolas, and Naomi Truan. 2016. “France: The Reluctance to Use the Word “Populism” as a Concept.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe. A Cross-National Analysis of European Countries, ed. by Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes de Vreese: 181–194. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihl, Olivier, Janine Chêne, and Eric Vial. 2003. La tentation populiste au cœur de l’Europe. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Kämper, Heidrun. 2005. Der Schulddiskurs in der frühen Nachkriegszeit. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des sprachlichen Umbruchs nach 1945. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhardt. 1992. “Volk, Nation, Nationalismus, Masse.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 7, ed. by Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhardt Koselleck: 141–431. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1977. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism – Fascism – Populism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Lafon, Pierre. 1980. “Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus.” Mots 1 (1): 127–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lecolle, Michelle. 2007. “Enjeux argumentatifs de la nomination : le cas du nom collectif communauté dans les discours publics contemporains.” In Christian Boix (ed.), Argumentation, manipulation, persuasion: 227–247. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 2000. Analyser les textes de communication. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Mange, Jessica and Pascal Marchand. 2007. “ Oui ou non à la Constitution européenne. L’éloquence du forum.” Mots (83). 121–137. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Moirand, Sophie. 2004. “L’impossible clôture des corpus médiatiques. La mise au jour des observables entre catégorisation et contextualisation.” Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique (40). 71–92.Google Scholar
Retterath, Jörn. 2016. ,Was ist das Volk?‘. Volks- und Gemeinschaftskonzepte der politischen Mitte in Deutschland 1917–1924. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André. 2002. L’illusion populiste. De l’archaïque au médiatique. Paris: Berg International.Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang, and Anna Cermáková. 2004. “Directions in corpus linguistics.” In Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction, ed. by Michel A. K. Halliday, Anna Cermáková, Wolfgang Teubert, and Colin Yallop: 113–166. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain, Paul Thibaud, Benjamin Stora, Jean Stengers, Odile Rudelle, Alain Besancon, Alain Bergounioux, Bertrand Badie, and Maurice Agulhon. 1997. “Le populisme ?Vingtième Siècle 56 (1): 224–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truan, Naomi. 2016a. Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
. 2016b. Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
. 2016c. Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus]. ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL].Google Scholar
. 2017. “Zwischenrufe zwischen parlamentarischer Routine und Kreativität. Bundestagsdebatten über Europa aus dem Blickwinkel von unautorisierten Unterbrechungen.” Cahiers d’Etudes Germaniques (73): 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Generisch, unpersönlich, indefinit? Die Pronomina man, on, one und generisches you im politischen Diskurs.” In Hélène Vinckel-Roisin, Laurent Gautier and Pierre-Yves Modicom (eds.), Diskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich: 347–363. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2008. “Well-known and influential corpora.” In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö: 383–457. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Salamurović, Aleksandra
2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi
2019. Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67:3  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.