Right wing populism has always been exclusionary in nature and relies on classic positive in-group/negative out-group constructions (van Dijk 1998). This chapter investigates how the UK Independence Party (UKIP) discursively constructed ‘the people’ during the 2016 ‘Brexit’ referendum campaign. It will be argued that ‘the people’ were defined in opposition to two key groups: Elite mainstream political actors and migrants. The consequence of this strategy has been the legitimisation of race hate crimes and a further conceptual separation of ‘the people’ from the political classes. Data is taken from the UKIP twitter account and I qualitatively analyse this by paying particular attention to topoi and to the discursive construction of ‘the people’ as a social actor.
2014 “Love Britain? Vote UKIP! The Pragmatics of Electoral Tweets during the European Elections 2014.” In Tweets from the Campaign Trail: Researching Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the European Parliamentary Elections, ed. by Alex Frame, Arnaud Mercier, Gilles Brachotte, and Caja Thimm. Vienna: Peter Lang.
Adi, Ana, Kristofer Erickson, and Darren Lilleker
2014 “Elite Tweets: Analyzing the Twitter Communication Patterns of Labour Party Peers in the House of Lords.” Policy and Internet 6 (2014), (1): 1–27.
2015 “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective.” Political Studies 64: 1–17.
2006“UKIP demands apology from Cameron.” BBC News, 4 April, 2006. Accessed 30 March: 2017. [URL].
2016 “New ‘Crises’, Old Habits: Online Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in UK Migration Policy Discourses.” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies: 1–21.
2018aConstructions of Migrant Integration in British Public Discourse: Becoming British. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
2018b “Present tense, future (im)perfect: ‘Brexit’ as a crisis issue in UK political discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 15.
1990The Social Construction of Pedagogic Discourse: Vol. IV, Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge.
1995Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
2016 “The seeds of post-Brexit racial violence lie in government policy.” Open Democracy, 2 December 2016. Accessed 3 April, 2017. [URL]
2013 “In Search of Ordinary People: The Problematic Politics of Popular Participation.” Communication, Culture and Critique 6 (2): 208–226.
Deacon, David, and Dominic Wring
2016 “The UK Independence Party, populism and the British News Media: Competition, Collaboration or Containment?” European Journal of Communication 31 (2): 169–184.
Dennison, James, and Matthew Goodwin
2015 “Immigration, Issue Ownership and the Rise of UKIP.” Parliamentary Affairs 8 (1): 168–187.
2017 “Ukip politicians condemn leadership candidate’s ‘£9,000 to leave UK’ idea.” Guardian, 18 August 2017. Accessed 21 August, 2017. [URL].
2016 “Nigel Farage, celebrity everyman.” In UK Election Analysis 2015: Media, Voters and the Campaign, Early Reactions from Leading UK Academics, ed. by Daniel Jackson, and Einar Thorsen: 99–100. Bournemouth: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.
1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Ford, Robert, and Matthew Goodwin
2014 “Understanding UKIP: Identity, Social Change and the Left Behind.” The Political Quarterly 85 (3): 277–284.
1972Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. Alan Sheridan Smith, London: Routledge.
2016 “In this Brexit vote, the poor turned on an elite who ignored them.” Guardian, 25 June 2016. Accessed 30 March, 2017. [URL].
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave
2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345.
2011 “Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism.” Sociological Theory 29 (2): 75–96.
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips
2002Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
2015 “Hero Mythology and Right-Wing Populism: A Discourse-Mythological Case Study of Nigel Farage in the Mail Online.” Journalism Studies. Accessed 2 February, 2017.
2010 “Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72.
2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Third Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer: 205–233. London: Sage.
2002The Practice of Conceptual History. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
2016 “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse and Society 27 (3): 308–321.
1990New Reflections on the Revolutions of Our Time. London: Verso.
2005 “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. by Francisco Panizza: 32–49. London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
2022. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
2020. Performative and ideological populism: The case of charismatic leaders on Twitter. Discourse & Society 31:3 ► pp. 268 ff.
2021. The Case of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP). In The Populist Radical Right and Health, ► pp. 139 ff.
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff.
Tanner, Samuel & Aurélie Campana
2022. “We Are the News Now”: The Role of Networked Conspiracy and the Quebec “Tweetosphere” in Shaping the Narrative Around the Anti-COVID-19 Restrictions. In Right-Wing Extremism in Canada and the United States [Palgrave Hate Studies, ], ► pp. 155 ff.
Tanner, Samuel & Aurélie Campana
2022. « Je ne suis pas anti-vaccin, mais cette affaire de COVID-19 pue la merde ». Criminologie 55:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.