Chapter 11
The Volk (‘people’) and its modes of representation by Alternative für Deutschland-AfD (‘Alternative for Germany’)
The concept of the German ‘people’ is central in the discourses of the new political party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which emerged on the political scene in 2013. Characterised as a right-wing populist Eurosceptic party, AfD presents itself as giving voice to the German ‘people’, its concerns and fears, in counterposition to other political groupings which it describes as etabliert (established) or Altparteien (old parties). These parties, it asserts, have betrayed the German people both economically and culturally, and this has been exacerbated by their responses to recent migratory movements. In this context, it is pertinent to ask what the term ‘(German) people’ actually means for this political movement: what are its representatives referring to when they speak of the ‘(German) people’? Who are the ‘people’ whose legitimate representative AfD claims to be? What words are used to describe them, and how are they represented in their relationships to other players, such as the government, the established parties, the EU, or migrants and refugees? The present study will focus on the following sources: the bulletin AfD-Kompakt, the election manifestos, and the Twitter accounts of the party and its leader Frauke Petry. First, I analyse the lexemes used to refer to the people, taking into account their connotations in the historical context of German nationalism. Secondly, I conduct a qualitative analysis of key excerpts from these sources in which the ‘people’ are represented in their relationship with their various adversaries. Finally, I bring these ideas together to consider the AfD’s characteristic mode of representation, that is, the way in which it legitimises its claims to speak for the German people.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Aim and methodology
- Data overview
- Lexemes for referring to the ‘people’
-
Volk (people)
-
Bevölkerung (population)
-
Bürger (citizen)
-
Mensch (human being)
- Are the contexts of use the same?
- Characteristics of the ‘people’, according to the AfD
- 4. Delegitimation of those who govern
- Modes of representation: AfD and ‘the people’
- Conclusions
-
Notes
-
Bibliography
References (29)
Bibliography
Textual sources:
Für unser Land und unsere Kinder. Unser Programm zur Landtagswahl am 4.9.2016. February 16. [URL]
Grundsatzprogramm für Deutschland. Der Grundsatzprogramm der Alternative für Deutschland. 2016. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Twitter Alternative für Deutschland. [URL]
Twitter Frauke Petry. [URL]
Secondary bibliography:
Busse, Dietrich. 1994. “Hailig Reich, Teutsch Nacion, Tutsche Lande: Zur Geschichte kollektiver Selbstbezeichnungen in frühneunochdeutschen Urkundentexten.” In Begriffsgeschichte und Diskursgeschichte, ed. by Dietrich Busse, Fritz Hermanns, and Wolfgang Teubert: 268–298. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Cleen, Benjamin. 2019. “The Populist Political Logic and the Discursive Construction of ‘the People’.” This volume.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deschouwer, Kris, and Sam Depauw (eds). 2014. Representing the People. A Survey among Members of Statewide and Sub-state Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elliker, Florian. 2015. “Populismus als radikalisierter konservativer Diskurs.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 41 (1): 79–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardt, Andreas. 2000. “Nation und Sprache in der Zeit der Aufklärung.” In Nation und Sprache. Zur Diskussion ihres Verhältnisses in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ed. by Andreas Gardt: 169–198. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermanns, Fritz. 2003. “‘Volk‘ und ‘Nation‘: Zur Semantik zweier geschichtsmächtiger Begriffe.” Der Deutschunterricht 2: 26–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Lutz. 1991. “Das‚Volk. Zur Ideologischen Struktur eines unvermeidbaren Begriffs.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20 (3): 191–208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kara, Stefanie, and Claudia Wüstenhagen. 2012. “Die Macht der Worte.” Zeit Online. October 9. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey, and Michael N. Short. 2007. Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. 2ª ed. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lötzsch, Ronald. 1999. “Was ist ein Volk und was eine Nation?” UTOPIE kreativ 103
/
104: 15–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Goverment and Opposition 50 (2): 189–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Neill, John. 2001. “Representing people, representing nature, representing the world.” Government and Policy 19: 483–500. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Önnerfors, Andreas. 2019. “Performing ‘the People’ The Populist Style of Politics in the German PEGIDA-Movement.” This volume.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelinka, Anton. 2013. “Right-Wing Populism: Concept and Typology.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral: 3–22. London: Bloomsbury. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Retterath, Jörn. 2016. Was ist das Volk? Volks- und Gemeinschaftskonzepte der politischen Mitte in Deutschland 1917–1924. Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saward, Michael. 2008. “Making representations: modes and strategies of political parties.” European Review 16: 271–286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schellenberg, Britta. 2013. “Developments within the Radical Right in Germany: Discourses, Attitudes and Actors.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral: 149–162. London: Bloomsbury. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truan, Naomi. 2019. “The Discursive Construction of the ‘People’ in European Political Discourse. A Corpus-Based Contrastive Discourse Analysis of German, French and British Parliamentary Debates.” This volume.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1992. “Discourse and the denial of racism.” Discourse and Society 3 (1): 87–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wildt, Michael. 2017. Volk, Volksgemeinschaft, AfD. Hamburg: Verlag des Hamburger Instituts für Sozialforschung.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. “‘Normalisierung nach rechts’: Politischer Diskurs im Spannungsfeld von Neoliberalismus, Populismus und kritischer Öffentlichkeit.” Linguistik Online 73 (4): 27–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.