Chapter published in:
Variation in Political Metaphor
Edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps and Paul H. Thibodeau
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 85] 2019
► pp. 131150
References

References

Bach-y-rita, P., Collins, C. C., Sauders, F., White, B. & Scadden, L.
(1969) Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221, 963–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds), Embodied grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches (pp. 9–42), New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beer, R.
(2003) The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11, 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, W. A. & Cobb, M. D.
(2006) Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty framing and public perceptions of success and failure in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 831–854. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bougher, L. D.
(2012) The case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition. Political Psychology, 33, 145–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. A.
(1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bustos, E.
(2000) La metáfora ensayos transdisciplinares. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.Google Scholar
Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. & Haggard, P.
(2006) Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol., 16, 1905–1910. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Lupyan, G.
(2015) All concepts are Ad Hoc Concepts. In Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (Eds), The Conceptual Mind: New directions in the Study of Concepts (pp. 543–566), Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2011) Politics and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (2nded.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Erasmus
(1974) Zoonomia, New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., and Gallgher, S.
(2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 441–447. Crossref.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Ezequiel
2009Extended Life. Topoi, 28, 9–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, D. V. & Stromback, J.
(2005) Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 67 (5), 399–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M.
(1971) Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago, IL: Marham.Google Scholar
Engel, A. K., Fries, P. & Singer, W.
(2001) Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 704–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M.
(2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Froese, T. & Ziemke, T.
(2009) Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence, 173 (3–4), 466–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V.
(2010) Embodied simulation and its role in intersubjectivity. In Fuchs, T., Sattel, H. C. & Henningsen, P. (eds.), The Embodied Self: Dimensions, Coherence and Disorders (pp. 78–92), Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3/4), 455–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghiglione, R.
(1974) Attitudes psycholinguistiques et perception des mots. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 170–180.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2005) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2008) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A.
(2012) A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 (1): 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. & de Vignemont, F.
(2009) Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (4): 154–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Long, D. & Mio, J. S.
(1989) What are the cognitive and conceptual components of humorous texts? Poetics, 18, 143–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, S. T.
(2009) Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1156, 97–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, M., Anderson, C., Khan, A., Avants, B., Elman, L. & McCluskey, L.
(2008) Impaired action knowledge in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 71 (18), 1396–1401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. M.
(2007) The sophisticated public: The effect of competing frames on public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 377–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, I. P. H., Cliff, D., Thompson, A. & Jakobi, N.
(1997) Evolutionary robotics: the Sussex approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20, 207–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haser, V.
(2005) Metaphor, Metonymy and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Mouton: Berlin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O. & Pulvermüller, F.
(2004) Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto central cortex. Hum Brain Mapp, 21 (3), 191–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M.
(1962) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howe, N.
(1988) Metaphor in contemporary American political discourse. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 3, 87–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. D. & Menon, A.
(1995) Metaphors and competitive advantage: Evaluating the use of metaphors in theories of competitive strategy. Journal of Business Research, 33, 81–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, L., Landau, M. J., Rothschild, Z. & Sullivan, D.
(2011) Exploring metaphor’s epistemic function: Uncertainty moderates metaphor-consistent priming effects on social perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 657–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
2001Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, J. T.
(1960) The Effects of Mass Communication. New York, N.Y.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Klemperer, V.
(1947) LTI, la langue du troisième Reich, trad. Élisabeth Guillot, Paris, Albin Michel, Pocket 2003.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. & Roberts, R. M.
(1993) The empirical study of figurative language in literature. Poetics, 22, 151–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Roberts, R. M., Johnson, B. K. & Bertus, E. L.
(1996) Figurative language occurrence and co-occurrence in contemporary literature. In Kreuz, R. J. & MacNealy, M. S. (Eds). Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics (pp. 83–97), New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Crenshaw, M., Post, J. M. & Victoroff, J.
(2007) What should this fight be called? Metaphors of counterterrorism and their implications. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 97–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. The Communication and Public Opinion.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P. & Keefer, L. A.
(2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D. & Meier, B. P.
(2013) The Power of Metaphor: Examining its Influence on Social Life. Washington, D. C.: APA Press.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D. & Greenberg, J.
(2009) Evidence that self-relevant motivations and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social issues. Psychological Science, 20, 1421–1427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maturana H. & Varela F. J.
(1987) The Tree of Knowledge. Shambhala, Boston.Google Scholar
McGlone, M.
(2007) What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27, 109–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D.
(2005) Gesture and Thought. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1963) The Structure of Behavior, trans. A. Fisher. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Mio, J. S. & Katz, A. N.
(Eds.) (1996) Metaphor: Implications and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mio, J. S. & Lovrich, N. P.
(1998) Men of zeal: Memory for metaphors in the Iran-Contra hearings. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 49–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mio, J. S., Riggio, R. E., Levin, S. & Reese, R.
(2005) Presidential leadership and charisma: The effects of metaphor. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 287–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2016) Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Noë, A.
(2004) Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nolfi, S. & Floreano, D.
(2000) Evolutionary Robotics. The Biology, Intelligence and Technology of Self–Organizing Machines. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Núñez, R.
(2010) Enacting infinity: Bringing transfinite cardinals into being, in Stewart, J., Gappene, O. & Di Paolo, E. (Eds), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm in Cognitive Science (pp. 307–333), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Regan, K. J. & Noë, A.
(2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5), 883–917.Google Scholar
Ottati, V. C. & Renstrom, R. A.
(2010) Metaphor and persuasive communication: A multi-functional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4/9, 783–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S.
(2000) The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution (Second edition). Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A.
(1979) Psychological Processes in the Comprehension of Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (Ed), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 150–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G.
(2011) Grounding Procedural and Declarative Knowledge in Sensomotor Anticipation. Mind & Language, 26 (1), 78–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1967) Biologie et Connaissance. Paris: Pléiade.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(2007) The Stuff of Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H.
(1907) La Science et l’Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G.
(2008) Empathie und Spiegelneurone: Die Biologische Basis des Mitgefühls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rossler, P. & Schenk, M.
(2000) Cognitive bonding and the German reunification: Agenda-setting and persuasion effects of mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12 (1), 29–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., Bless, H.
(2007) Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. In Stapel, D. A. & Suls, J. (Eds), Assimilation and Contrast in Social Psychology (pp. 119–141), Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M.
(2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50 (2), 93–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L.
(2011) Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soroka, S. N.
(2003) Media, public opinion, and foreign policy. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 8 (1), 27–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, W.
(2008) A deflationary account of metaphor. In: Gibbs, R. W. (Ed). Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 84–108. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M.
(2007) The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, D. A.
(1988) Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Stroebel, L.
(2010) Die Entstehung Einer Neuen Kategorie – Leerverben als Paralleler Kopulastrang. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011) Invisible, visible, grammaticalization. In Callies, M., Lohöfer, A. & Keller, W. (Eds), Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, Challenges and Limitations, 211–234. New York/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Grenzen und Spielräume der Wahrnehmung – eine typologische Analyse von Bewegungs-, Kontakt- und Lokationsverben. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik (Beiheft „Perzeptive Linguistik“), 157, 169–186.Google Scholar
(2014b) Sprache & Gedanken: Mit Sherlock Holmes auf Spurensuche. In: Melchior, L. et al.. (eds.), Spuren.Suche (in) der Romania, 59–72. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014c) Sensomotorische strategien & sprachwandel. In: Elissa Pustka & Stefanie Goldschmitt (eds.), Emotionen, Expressivität, Emphase, 139–154. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
(2015) Linguistic realizations of the concept of FEAR, In Gamerschlag, T., Gerland, D., Osswald, R. & Petersen, W. Meaning, Frames and Conceptual Representation. Studies in Language and Cognition 2 (pp.219–236), Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2016) Sensory-Motor Concepts – at the Crossroads between Language & Cognition. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
(2017a) The linguistic influence of perceptual and conceptual parameters. In Wallington, A., Foltz, A. & Ryan, J. (Eds), Selected Papers from the 6th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Online Proceedings of UK-CLA Meetings, http://​uk​-cla​.org​.uk​/proceedings Vol 4: 169–186.Google Scholar
(2017b) How submorphological relics of perceptual parameters still influence synchronic use and may have had an impact on recent presidential elections. Signifiances (Signifying), 1 (3), 151–169.Google Scholar
(2018a) Can Macromania be explained linguistically? Beneath the morphological boundary: A sketch of subconscious manipulation strategies in Emmanuel Macron’s political discourses. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 5 (1), 65–84.Google Scholar
(2018b) Sensomotorische Konzepte – Simulationsstrategien im französischen Wahlkampf. In Dombert, S. & Wieders-Lohéac, A. (Eds), Wahlkampf ist Wortkampf – Präsidentschaftswahlkampagnen aus Sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht, Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H. & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6 (2), e16782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. & Cosmelli, D.
(2011) Brain in a vat or body in a world? Brain bound versus enactive views of experience. Philosophical Topics, 39, 163–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. & Varela, F.
(2001) Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 418–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E.
(1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Westen, D.
(2007) The Political Brain, The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. Public Affairs: New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.
(2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 9 (4), 625–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. & Foglia, L.
(2011) Embodied Cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), Zalta, N. (Ed), http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/fall2011​/entries​/embodied​-cognition/.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. & Flores, F.
(1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S. & Srull, T. K.
(1989) Memory and Cognition in its Social Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar