Chapter published in:
Variation in Political Metaphor
Edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps and Paul H. Thibodeau
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 85] 2019
► pp. 151176
References

References

Benoit, K. & Laver, M.
(2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bougher, L. D.
(2012) The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition. Political Psychology, 33 (1), 145–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I.
(1994) A new spatial theory of party competition: Uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science, 24 (4), 443–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I., Robertson, D. & Hearl, D.
(1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaban, N. & Kelly, S.
(2017) Tracing the Evolution of EU Images Using a Case-Study of Australia and New Zealand. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (4), 691–708. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaban, N., Stats, K. & Bain, J.
(2006) The European Union in Metaphors: Images of the EU in the Asia-Pacifica. 20th IPSA World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, 9–13 July.Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
(2013) Bringing Concepts from Cognitive Linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development, 16 (2), 294–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortazzi, M. & Jin, L.
(1999) Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In Low, G. & Cameron, L. (Eds), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 149–76), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drulák, P.
(2004) Metaphors Europe lives by: Language and institutional change of the european union. In EUI Working Paper SPS no. 2004/15. San Domenico: European University Institute.Google Scholar
(2005) Identifying and assessing metaphors: The discourse on European future. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Granada, 14–19 April 2005.Google Scholar
(2006) Motion, container and equilibrium: metaphors in the discourse about European integration. European Journal of International Relations, 12 (4), 499–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Of metaphors, concepts and reality: A reply to onuf. Perspectives – The Central European Review of International Affairs, 18 (1), 77–86.Google Scholar
Drulák, P. & Beneš, V.
(2015) Czech metaphors about Europe: Havel vs Klaus. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18 (4), 532–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drulák, P. & Konigová, L.
(2007) Figuring out Europe: EU metaphors in the minds of Czech civil servants. Perspectives – The Central European Review of International Affairs, 15 (1), 5–23.Google Scholar
Eder, N., Jenny, M. & Müller, W. C.
(2017) Manifesto functions: How party candidates view and use their party’s central policy document. Electoral Studies, 45, 75–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A. & Hix, S.
(2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (3), 533–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, M. J. & Hix, S.
(2002) Defining the EU political space: An empirical study of the European elections manifestos, 1979–1999. Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), 934–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(1972a) Introduction. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. H. (Eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 1–25), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1972b) The speech community. In Giglioli, P. (Ed), Language and Social Context (pp. 219–31), Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Havlík, V.
(2011) A breaking-up of a pro-European consensus: attitudes of Czech political parties towards the European integration (1998–2010). Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44 (2), 129–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellstrom, J.
(2008) Who leads, who follows? re-examining the party-electorate linkages on European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 15 (8), 1127–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. & Noury, A.
(2009) After enlargement: voting patterns in the sixth European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34 (2), 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulsse, R.
(2006) Imagine the EU: The metaphorical construction of a supra-nationalist identity. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9 (4), 396–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaal, B.
(2017) Worldview and Social Practice: A Discourse-Space Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2009a) The EU constitution in a stereoscopic view: Qualitative content analysis and metaphor analysis compared. In Bruell, C., Mokre, M. & Pausch, M. (Eds), Democracy Needs Dispute – the Debate on the European Constitution (pp. 119–162), Frankfurt/​Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
(2009b) Metaphors of the EU constitutional debate: ways of charting discourse coherence in a complex metaphor field. Metaphorik.de, 9 (2): 49–100.Google Scholar
(2012) Optimizing the analysis of metaphor in discourse: How to make the most of qualitative software and find a good research design. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10 (1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. & McDonald, M.
(2007) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and Oecd 1990–2003. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kovář, J.
(2015) Europeanisation of EP election manifestos: An application of a new approach on the case of slovak political parties. Czech Journal of Political Science, 22 (2), 105–126.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2016) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3rd ed. ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C. J.
(2010) The aggregating function of political parties in EU decision-making. Living Reviews in European Governance, 5 (3).Google Scholar
Luoma-aho, M.
(2004) ‘‘Arm’ versus “Pillar’: The politics of metaphors of the Western European Union at the 1990–91 intergovernmental conference on political union. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (1), 106–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004) The heart of the European body politic. British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25 (5–6), 437–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serfaty, S.
(Ed) (2003) The European Finality Debate and Its National Dimensions. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. & Szczerbiak, A.
(2002) Europeanisation, Euroscepticism and party systems: Party-based Euroscepticism in the candidate states of Central and Eastern Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3 (1), 23–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trechsel, A. H. & Mair, P.
(2011) When parties – also – position themselves: an introduction to the EU profiler. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8 (1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J.
(1988) The pen is a mighty sword: Quentin Skinner’s analysis of politics. In Tully, J. (Ed); Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics (pp. 7–25), Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
van Elfrinkhof, A., Maks, I. & Kaal, B.
(2014) From text to political positions: The convergence of political, discourse and linguistic analysis. In Kaal, B., Maks, I. & van Elfrinkhof, A. (Eds), From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis across Disciplines (pp. 297–324), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hloušek, Vít & Petr Kaniok
2021. Europe forever? Czech political parties on the orientation of Czech foreign policy. East European Politics 37:4  pp. 702 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.