Cover not available
Part of
The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses
Edited by Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 87] 2020
► pp. 1–20

Introduction

Constructing and communicating crisis discourse from cognitive, discursive and sociocultural perspectives

Article outline
  • 1.Aims and contributions of the volume
  • 2.An overview of crisis and crisis management studies
  • 3.To study the language of crisis with a discourse and cognitive-based approach
    • 3.1Analysing the discursive aspects within crisis-related discourse
    • 3.2Exploring conceptual metaphors and frames with a discourse and cognitive-based approach
  • 4.The volume’s contributions to the studies of metaphors and frames in crisis discourse
  • 5.Overview of individual chapters’ original research and findings
  • 6.Scope and interest of the volume
  • References
Published online: 16 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.87.00hua
References
Bailey, David J., Mònica Clua-Losada, Nikolai Huke, Olatz Ribera-Almandoz, and Kelly Rogers
2016 “Challenging the Age of Austerity: Disruptive Agency after the Global Economic Crisis.” Comparative European Politics 20 (5):725–751.Google Scholar
Baxter, Judith
2010 “Discourse-Analytic Approaches to Text and Talk.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, edited by Lia Litosseliti, 117–137. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bendle, Mervyn F.
2002 “The Crisis of ‘Identity’ in High Modernity.” The British Journal of Sociology 53 (1):1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann
1967 The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K., John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones
2008 Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Olga
2014 Corporate Identity and Crisis Response Strategies. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boin, Arjen, Magnus Ekengren, and Mark Rhinard
2010 “The Study of Crisis Management.” In The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, edited by Cavelty Myriam Dunn and Victor Mauer, 452–462. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, and Alice Deignan
2006 “The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse.” Applied Linguistics 27:671–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalozin-Dovrat, Lin
2013 “ ‘Crisis’ in Modernity: A Sign of the Times between Decisive Change and Potential Irreversibility.” In Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives, edited by Antoon De Rycker and Zuraidah Mohd Don, 67–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comfort, Louise K.
2007 “Crisis management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control.” Public Administration Review 67 (1):189–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy, and Sherry J. Holladay
2010 The Handbook of Crisis Communication. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak
(eds.) 2015 Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, Jose Sanders, and Lieven Vandelanotte
2012 Textual Choices in Discourse: A View from Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Mohd Don
(eds.) 2013 Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, Claes, H.
2005 “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information and Design Journal 13 (1):51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1978 Writing and Difference. Translated by A Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1:17-27.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus, and Christoph Sauer
2003 Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M.
1993 “Framing: Toward a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 41:6–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, Guiseppina Cortese, and Patrizia Ardizzone
2007 Discourse and Contemporary Social Change. Oxford: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975 “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
(ed.) 2014 Discourse in Context. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens
eds. 2007 The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cognitive linguistics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffmann, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica
2007 Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallahan, Kirk
1999 “Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (3):205–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Peter
2010 Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher
(ed.) 2011 Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hearit, Keith, and Jeffrey Courtright
2003 “A Social Constructionist Approach to Crisis Management: Allegations of Sudden Acceleration in the Audi 5000.” Communication Studies 54 (1):79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Robert L., and H. Dan O’Hair
(eds.) 2009 Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte
2015 “ ‘Why Am I to Blame When the Law is on My Side?’: A Study of Crises, Public Opinion and Frames.” On the Horizon 23 (4):363–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theodorus, Albertus Johannes Maria, and Gisela Redeker
1999 Cognitive Linguistics, Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2015 Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Ill.; London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebert, Wolf-Andreas, Gisela Redeker, and Linda R. Waugh
(eds.) 1997 Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1979 “The Society Theory of Thinking.” In Artificial Intelligence, an MIT Perspective, edited by Patrick Henry Winston and Richard H. Brown, 421–450. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2004 Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmilan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21:23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian, and Ken Hyland
2011 Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1996 Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Uriel, Arjen Boin, and Louise K. Comfort
eds. 2001 Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Uriel, Michael T. Charles, Paul Hart, T., Alexander Kouzmin, and Alan Jarman
1989 “From Case Studies to Theory and Recommendations: A Concluding Analysis.” In Coping with Crisis, edited by Uriel Rosenthal, Michael Charles and Paul Hart, 436–472. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, and Jane Demmen
2016 “An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer.” Applied Linguistics:1–22.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Andrew Hardie, and Paul Rayson
2017 “The Online Use of Violence and Journey Metaphors by Patients with Cancer, as Compared with Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study.” BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 7:60–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shank, J.
2008 “Crisis: A Useful Category of Post-Social Scientific Historical Analysis?” The American Historical Review 113 (4):1090–1099. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2016 “The Persuasive (and Manipulative) Power of Metaphor in ‘Austerity’ Discourse: A Corpus-based Analysis of Embodied and Moral Metaphors of Austerity in the Portuguese Press.” In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Socio-Cognitive Interaction: A Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Approach edited by Manuela Romano and Maria Dolores Porto, 79–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Karen
2013 Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1993 Framing in Discourse. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, Yiyoung Kim, and Mari Takada
2008 Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Rongpei, Shunde Men, Tailin Wang, Jiang Liu, Jianhua Song, and Xueqing Zheng
(eds.) 2015 Xinhua Dictionary (Chinese-English Edition). 3rd ed. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wrenn, Mary, V.
2014 “Agency, Identity, and the Great Crisis: A Veblenian Perspective.” Journal of Economic Issues 46 (2):403–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak
2003 Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Paul A. Chilton
2005 A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar