Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Studies in Public Communication
Edited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 92] 2021
► pp. 297–320

Chapter 13
Compensatory discourse strategies in the bilingual university classroom

ORCID logo | Universidad de MálagaSpain
Contrastive Discourse Analysis operates in a boundary area where linguistics and psychology overlap. Systematic analysis of classroom and academic discourse can enhance approaches to public discourse, including those dealing with the communicative content rather than the form of texts. Such is the context of the bilingual discourse in the university classroom. This study takes a sequenced and multi-methodological approach to analyse, first, the errors in spoken performance in the bilingual classroom; second, the impact of these errors on overall intelligibility. The sample is taken from academic discourse and is comprised of 34 hours of spoken interaction with eight different Spanish speakers teaching through English. The findings show that compensatory discourse strategies, including listener comprehension, impacted communication much more than the errors detracted from it.
Keywords: academic discourse, intelligibility, multicompetence, contrastive discourse analysis, compensation strategies, bilingualism, English as a lingua franca
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Method and sample
  • 4.Analysis and findings
    • 4.1Stage one
      • 4.1.1Phonological mis-performances
      • 4.1.2Interrogation and listener accommodation
    • 4.2Stage two
      • 4.2.1Phonological intelligibility and negative structures
      • 4.2.2Combined errors and interrogative function
      • 4.2.3Complex constructs: Verbal patterns and adjunctive syntax
      • 4.2.4Complex constructs: Causation
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.92.13gri
References (41)
References
Bokor, Michael. 2011. “Connecting with the ‘Other’ in Technical Communication: World Englishes and Ethos Transformation of U.S. Native English-Speaking Students.” Technical Communication Quarterly 20 (2): 208–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia, and Vera Kempe. 2018. “Linking Adult Second Language Learning and Diachronic Change: A Cautionary Note.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2006. Language and Mind (3rd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clement, Karen A. 2011. “The World Englishes Paradigm and its Implications for International Students’ Acquisition of Standard American English for University-Level Studies in the United States.” Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects. Paper 272.Google Scholar
Cohen, Louis, and Lawrence Manion. 1989. Research Methods in Education (3rd ed). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian, and Li Wei (eds). 2016. The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multicompetence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, Emma, and Ute Smit. 2019. ROAD-MAPPING English Medium Education in the Internationalised University. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan L. 2007. “Grice Cooperative Principle: Meaning and Rationality.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2308–2331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Tracey, and Murrey Munro. 2005. “Second Language Accent and Pronunciation Teaching: A Research-based Approach.” TESOL Quarterly 39 (3): 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 2006. “Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics – Introduction to the Special Issue.” Applied Linguistics 27 (4): 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2002. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fortanet-Gomez, Inmaculada. 2012. “Academics’ Beliefs about Language Use and Proficiency in Spanish Multilingual Higher Education.” AILA Review 25: 48–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Mary. 2015. “Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education: Professor Support Network.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Málaga. [URL]
. 2017. “Tapping into the Intellectual Capital at the University.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 5 (12A): 134–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “In-service Training for Bilingual Implementation at the University.” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies 14 (1): 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ke. 2007. “Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse.” Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 266–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, Niina. 2012. “ICL at the Micro Level: L2 Speakers Taking on the Role of Language Experts.” AILA Review 25: 13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2007. English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo, and Martin Dewey. 2011. “Review of Developments into Research into English as a Lingua Franca.” Language Teaching 44 (3): 281–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jocuns, Andrew. 2012. “Classroom Discourse.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle, 620–625. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2018 (2007). Discourse Analysis (3rd ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter, and Praful Mangalath. 2011. “The Construction of Meaning.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2): 346–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Judith, and Gretchen Sunderman. 2003. “Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learners and Bilinguals: The Development of Lexical and Conceptual Representations.” In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Catherine Doughty, and Michael H. Long, 104–129. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Loebell, Helga, and Kathyrn Bock. 2003. “Structural Priming across Languages.” Linguistics 41 (5): 791–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, Francisco A. 2008. “Instructional Discourse in Bilingual Settings. An Empirical Study of Linguistic Adjustments in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” Language Learning Journal 36 (1): 21–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Murrey J. 2008. “Foreign Accent and Speech Intelligibility.” In Phonology and Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Jette Hanson Edwards, and Mary Zampini, 193–218. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Luna, Rosa, and Lidia Taillefer. 2014. “A Mathematical Model for Academic Genre Awareness: Writer’s Metalinguistic Knowledge in English L2 Writing.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 27 (2): 469–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Cecil L. 2008. “Intelligibility since 1969.” World Englishes 27: 297–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio Alcalá, Fernando, and Manuel Hermosin Mojeda. 2010. “Implantación de un programa de plurilingüismo en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: análisis de contexto y detección de necesidades [Implementation of a plurilingual program in the European Higher Education Area: Context analysis and needs assessment].” XXI Revista de Educación 12: 107–128.Google Scholar
Rymes, Betsy. 2008. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool for Critical Reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2004. “Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 209–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sert, Olcay. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, Peter. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Larry E., and Cecil L. Nelson. 1985. “International Intelligibility of English: Directions and Resources.” World Englishes 4 (3): 333–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. Language, Speech, and Communication. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kimberly D. 2012. “Promoting Student Metacognition.” CBE – Life Sciences Education 11: 113–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, Elaine, Martha Bigelow, and Kit Hansen. 2013. Literacy and Second Language Oracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Scott. 2008. “Language, Communication and the Public Sphere.” In The Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yazan, Bedrettin. 2015. “Intelligibility.” ELT Journal (69) 2: 202–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Griffith, Mary
2023. Transdisciplinary engaged learning. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 12:Monográfico ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.