Cover not available
Part of
Science Communication in Times of Crisis
Edited by Pascal Hohaus
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 96] 2022
► pp. 15–40

Chapter 2
Which facts to trust in the debate on climate change?

On knowledge and plausibility in times of crisis

| University of Kassel
| University of Kassel
The assumption that the truth of facts is at the centre of knowledge crises would seem to suggest fact-checking or providing additional facts as methods of resolution. In this paper, this is reflected on by utilizing two complementary perspectives: an epistemological approach guided by theoretical positions from Philosophy of Science and a pragmalinguistic approach using methods of Applied Discourse Analysis. We argue that although facts are necessary in science communication, they are not sufficient. Instead, we suggest focusing on this question: To what extent do we consider a statement plausible? By dissecting a historical and a present case (geocentrism, climate change) and applying the complementary approaches described above, the relevance of their respective epistemic systems (Goldman 2010) and what we call ‘settings of comprehension’ can be revealed. In this process, it can be demonstrated why what some people consider absurd, others consider plausible, and vice versa. On this basis, science communication can operate from a more deliberate level.
Keywords: plausibility judgements, global warming, knowledge crisis, fact-checking, people-knowledge and thing-knowledge, epistemic systems, settings of comprehension
Article outline
  • Introduction: The state of facts in knowledge crises
  • Questioning knowledge
  • Questioning facts
  • Asking a different question
  • Plausibility as a pattern of thinking and reasoning
  • Dissecting two knowledge crises
    • The dispute between Galileo and Bellarmine
    • Harald Lesch’s “Clarifying misconceptions about climate change”
    • James Inhofe’s senate speech on climate change
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.96.02boh
References
Andriessen, Daniel
2010 “The Aptness of Knowledge Related Metaphors. A Research Agenda.” In The Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital, ed. by Susana Rodrigues, 59–66. Reading: Academic Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert
1997 “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Justification and Knowledge.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (4): 405–422.Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J.
1956 The Problem of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barrera, Oscar, Sergei Guriev, Emeric Henry, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya
2020 “Facts, Alternative Facts, and Fact Checking in Times of Post-Truth Politics.” Journal of Public Economics 182 (2): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittlingmayer, Uwe H.
2001 “ ‘Spätkapitalismus’ oder ‘Wissensgesellschaft’?” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B36: 15–22.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J.
1991 Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhnert, Martin
2020 Methodologische Signaturen. Ein philosophischer Versuch zur Systematisierung der empirischen Erforschung des Geistes von Tieren. Paderborn: Mentis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhnert, Martin, and Paul Reszke
2015 “Linguistisch-philosophische Untersuchungen zu Plausibilität. Über kommunikative Grundmuster bei der Entstehung von wissenschaftlichen Tatsachen.” In Auf der Suche nach den Tatsachen: Proceedings der 1. Tagung des Nachwuchsnetzwerks ‘INSIST’, 22.–23. Oktober 2014, Berlin, ed. by Julia Engelschalt, and Arne Maibaum, 40–67. Köln: SSOAR. [URL]
Boghossian, Paul
2011 “Epistemic Relativism Defended.” In Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, ed. by Alvin I. Goldman, and Dennis Whitcomb, 38–53. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coyne, George V.
2011 “Galileo and Bellarmine.” The Inspiration of Astronomical Phenomena VI ASP Conference Series 441: 3–11.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine
1994 “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice and Persuasion Across the Disciplines, ed. by James Chandler, Arnold I. Davidson, and Harry D. Harootunian, 243–274. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison
1992 “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
DeRose, Keith
2002 “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context.” Philosophical Review 111 (2): 167–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., and Aaron M. McCright
2011 “Organized Climate Change Denial.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. by John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, and David Schlosberg, 144–160. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutant, Julien
2015 “The Legend of the Justified True Belief Analysis.” Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 95–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Paul
2000 “The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 97 (11): 581–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “On Dreaming and Being Lied To.” Episteme 2 (3): 149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice A.
ed. 1989 The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik
1979 Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frandsen, Finn, and Winni Johansen
2017 Organizational Crisis Communication: A Multivocal Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gardt, Andreas
2018 “Wissenskonstitution im Text.” In Handbuch Text und Gespräch, ed. by Karin Birkner, and Nina Janich, 52–79. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I.
2010 “System-Oriented Social Epistemology.” Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3: 189–214.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian
1975 The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornuff, Daniel
2017 “Wissenschaft im postfaktischen Zeitalter. Sieben Thesen.” ZiF-Mitteilungen 22 (3): 68.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan J., and Matthias Steup
2017 “The Analysis of Knowledge.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. [URL] (accessed 17 July 2021).
infratest dimap
2015 Glaubwürdigkeit der Medien. Published October 31st by infratest dimap. [URL]
Inhofe, James
2015 Senate Speech on Climate Change. Filmed February 25th at the United States Capitol, Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. Video, 1:30:28–1:53:31. [URL]
Kaplan, Mark
1985 “It’s Not What You Know that Counts.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (7): 350–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin
1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Koch, Lutz
2002 “Versuch über Plausibilität.” In Rhetorik Argumentation Geltung, ed. by Andreas Dörpinghaus, and Karl Helmer, 193–204. Würzburg: Könighausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Konerding, Klaus-Peter
2015 “Sprache und Wissen.” In Handbuch Sprache und Wissen, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, and Andreas Gardt, 57–80. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart
1982 “Krise.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, ed. By Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck, 617–650. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer
1999 “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197): 471–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre
1978 “History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction.” In The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, vol 1, ed. by John Worrall, and Gregory Currie, 102–138. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1999 Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lesch, Harald
2019 Missverständnisse zum Klimawandel aufgeklärt. Published July 31st by Terra X Lesch & Co. Video, 20:55. [URL]
Longino, Helen, and Ruth Doell
1983 “Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science.” Signs 9 (2): 206–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luengo, María, and David García-Marín
2020 “The Performance of Truth: Politicians, Fact-Checking Journalism, and the Struggle to Tackle COVID-19 Misinformation.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8 (3): 405–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1980 “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition.” In Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, ed. by. Niklas Luhmann, 9–71, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lüthje, Corinna
2017 “Field-Specific Mediatization: Testing the Combination of Social Theory and Mediatization Theory Using the Example of Scientific Communication.” Mediatization Studies 1 (1): 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, Sakari, and Valtteri Sankari
2021 “Checking PolitiFact’s Fact-Checks” Journalism Studies 22 (3): 358–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online
2021 Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL] (accessed July 17, 2021).
Owens, David
2006 “Testimony and Assertion.” Philosophical Studies 130 (1): 105–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Tomothy S., Ian Milden, Mallory T. Wagner
2020 “Research Note: Does the Public Support Fact-Checking Social Media? It Depends Whom and How You Ask.” Misinformation Review 1 (8): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rödder, Simone
2018 “Differenzierungstheorie. Ein soziologischer Faktencheck der Diagnose eines ‘postfaktischen Zeitalters’.” In 10 Minuten Soziologie. Fakten, ed. by. Gianna Behrendt, and Anna Henkel, 17–34. Bielefeld: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard
1979 Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1971 Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven
1994 A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Jieun, and Kjerstin Thorson
2017 “Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Fact Checking Messages on Social Media.” Journal of Communication 67 (2): 233–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tereick, Jana
2016 Klimawandel im Diskurs. Multimediale Diskursanalyse Crossmedialer Korpora. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy
2000 Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winko, Simone
2015 “Zur Plausibilität als Beurteilungskriterium literaturwissenschaftlicher Interpretationen.” In Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens, ed. by Andrea Albrecht, Lutz Dannenberg, Olav Krämer, and Carlos Spoerhase, 483–512. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1969 On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1953 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Worsnip, Alex
2017 “Contextualism and Knowledge Norms.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, ed. by Jonathan J. Ichikawa, 177–190. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar