Cover not available
Part of
Hegemony, Discourse, and Political Strategy: Towards a post-Marxist understanding of contestation and politicization
Thomas Jacobs
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 97] 2022
► pp. 209–228

Bibliography

Acar, S. and Tekçe, M. 2008. “Multilateralism or Bilateralism: Trade Policy of the EU in the Age of Free Trade Agreements.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Economic Issues in a Globalizing World, ed. by Esen, O. and Ogus, A., 272–284. Izmir: Izmir University of Economics.Google Scholar
Alternative Trade Mandate. 2013. “Towards an Alternative Trade Mandate for the EU.” Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.
Althusser, L. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Amariglio, J. and Ruccio, D. 1994. “Postmodernism, Marxism, and the critique of modern economic thought.” Rethinking Marxism, 7(3): 7–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, N. 2003. Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., and Potter, J. 2003. “Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings.” Discourse Analysis Online, 1, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. 2004. AntConc: “A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit.” In Proceedings of the Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning, 7–13. University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
2005. “AntConc: design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom.” In Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference, 729–737. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniozzi, A. 2012. “Explanation of vote.” European Parliament. Accessed on 8th of April 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Arditi, B. 2007. “Post-hegemony: politics outside the usual post-Marxist paradigm. Contemporary Politics.” 13(3): 205–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Post-hegemony: Politics outside the usual post-Marxist paradigm. In Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today, ed. by Kioupkiolis, A. and Katsambekis, G., 27–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2022. "Populism Is Hegemony Is Politics? Ernesto Laclau’s Theory of Populism." In The Palgrave Handbook of Populism, ed. by Oswald, M., 49–68. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronowitz, S. 1986. “Theory and socialist strategy.” Social Text, 16: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avigur-Eshel, A. 2018. “Encouraging Action in the Private Sphere: Demand-Side Practices in the Depoliticization of Economic Policy in Israel.” Politics & Policy, 46(1): 84–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aydın-Düzgit, S. 2014. "Critical discourse analysis in analysing European Union foreign policy: Prospects and challenges." Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3): 354–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, C. and Goodwin, S. 2016. Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. and Bossuyt, F. 2013. “The European Union as a conveniently-conflicted counter-hegemon through trade.” Journal of Contemporary European Research. 9(4): 560–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. 2006. Glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., and Wodak, R. 2008. “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse & society, 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bal, P. M., and Dóci, E. 2018. "Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology." European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5): 536–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. 1997. “Barnes on Gibson-Graham: The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy.” Environment and Planning, 15(2): 247–248Google Scholar
Barnett, C. 2004. “Deconstructing radical democracy: articulation, representation, and being-with-others.” Political Geography, 23(5): 503–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barreira, J. 2010. “Early thinking and the emergence of entrepreneurship.” In Frontiers in entrepreneurship, ed. by Ubran, B., 1–32. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrow, C. 2018. “The Dismal Science of Post-Marxist Political Theory: Is There a Future in Postindustrial Socialism?” Teoria Polityki, 2: 207–236.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. 2016. “Manufacturing discontent: The rise to power of anti-TTIP groups.” ECIPE Occasional Paper, 2.Google Scholar
2019. “NGO lobbying on trade and investment.” Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies.Google Scholar
Beasley-Murray, J. 2010. Posthegemony: political theory and Latin America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Beetz, J. and Schwab, V. 2018. “Conditions and relations of (re) production in Marxism and Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies, 15(4): 338–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beetz, J., Herzog, B., and Maesse, J. 2018. “Introduction special issue Marx and discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies, 15(4): 321–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, S. 2011. "Do we really need a new constructivist institutionalism to explain institutional change?" British Journal of Political Science, 41: 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. "Where Are the Institutions? The Limits of Vivien Schmidt’s Constructivism." British Journal of Political Science, 42(3): 714–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, B. 1995. “New Reflections on the ‘Revolutionary’ Politics of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe.” boundary 2, 22(3): 81–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic governance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biegoń, D. 2017. Hegemonies of Legitimation: Discourse Dynamics in the European Commission. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Birch, K. 2017. A research agenda for neoliberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. and Muzaka, V. 2018. “Multilateralism.” In The Language of World Trade Politics: Unpacking the Terms of Trade, ed. by Dingwerth, K. and Weinhardt, C., 78–93. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. and Payne, A. 2019. “The left and the case for ‘progressive reglobalisation’.” Renewal: a Journal of Labour Politics, 27(3): 79–95.Google Scholar
Blanqui, A. 2007. Maintenant, il faut des armes. Paris: La fabrique éditions.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2016. Let op je woorden: politiek, taal en strijd. Antwerpen: Uitgeverij EPO.Google Scholar
Bollen, Y. 2018a. “EU trade policy.” In Handbook of European policies. Interpretive approaches to the EU, ed. by Heinelt, H. and Münch, S., 191–206. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b. “The domestic politics of EU trade policy: the political economy of CETA and anti-dumping in Belgium and the Netherlands.” Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University.
Borriello, A. and Jäger, A. 2021. “The antinomies of Ernesto Laclau: a reassessment.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(3): 298–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borriello, A., and Jäger, A. 2020. “Left-Populism on Trial: Laclauian Politics in Theory and Practice." Theory & Event, 23(3): 740–764.Google Scholar
Boucher, G. 2009. The charmed circle of ideology: a critique of Laclau and Mouffe, Butler and Zizek. Melbourne: re. press.Google Scholar
2010. “Author’s reply to reviews of the charmed circle of ideology.” Global discourse: a developmental journal of research in politics and international relations, 1(2): 1–8.Google Scholar
Brenner, H., Peck, J., and Theodore, N. 2010. “Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways.” Global networks, 10(2): 182–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., and Wattam, S. 2015. “Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2): 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., Timperley, M., and McEnery, A. 2018. #LancsBox v.4.x. Accessed on 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.
Brookes, G. and McEnery, T. 2019. “The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: A critical evaluation.” Discourse Studies, 21(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Žižek, S. 2000. Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cahill, D., and Konings, M. 2017. Neoliberalism. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cahill, D., Cooper, M., Konings, M., and Primrose, D. 2018. The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callinicos, A. 1985. “Postmodernism, Post-Structuralism, Post-Marxism?” Theory, Culture & Society, 2(3): 85–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. “The internationalist case against the European Union.” International Socialist, 148(5). Accessed on 8th of April 2022. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Camatte, J. 1988. Capital and community: the results of the immediate process of production and the economic work of Marx. London: Unpopular Books.Google Scholar
1995. This World We Must Leave: And Other Essays. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Carassai, S. 2007. “The noisy majority: an analysis of the argentine crisis of December 2001 from the theoretical approach of Hardt & Negri, Laclau and Žižek.” Travesia, 16(1): 45–62.Google Scholar
Carley, R. 2021. Cultural Studies Methodology and Political Strategy: Metaconjuncture. Berlin: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, N. and De Cleen, B. 2007. “Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2): 265–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, M. 2011. “Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change.” Political Studies, 59(3): 596–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cater, T. 2015. “The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy by JK Gibson-Graham.” The Canadian Geographer, 59(2): 43–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavooris, R. 2017. “Intellectuals and political strategy: hegemony, posthegemony, and post-Marxist theory in Latin America.” Contemporary Politics, 23(2): 231–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cederström, C. 2007. “The Lacanian Left Does Not Exist.” Ephemera 7(4): 609–614.Google Scholar
Chang, H. J. 2002. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Chaput, C. and Hanan, J. 2019. “Rhetorical Hegemony: Transactional Ontologies and the Reinvention of Material Infrastructures.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 52(4): 339–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. 2020. “The Construction of the Professional Identity of the TV News Presenter in Two Chinese News Programmes: A Discourse-Theoretical Study." Unpublished PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Uppsala University.
Chodor, T. 2014. “Not throwing the baby out with the bathwater: A Gramscian response to post-hegemony.” Contemporary Politics, 20(4): 489–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciccariello-Maher, G. 2020. "Populism, universalism, and democracy in Latin America." In The Oxford handbook of comparative political theory, ed. by Jenco, L. K., Idris, M., and Thomas, M., 504–524. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clarke, T. and Barlow, M. 1997. MAI: The multilateral agreement on investment and the threat to Canadian sovereignty. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar
Codrea-Rado, A. 2014. “European parliament has 24 official languages, but MEPs prefer English.” The Guardian. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Cowling, M. 2018. Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights: Controversy and Analysis. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crespy, A. 2014. “A dialogue of the deaf? Conflicting discourses over the EU and services liberalization in the WTO.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 16(1): 168–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Critchley, S. 2002. “Ethics, Politics and Radical Democracy: The History of a Disagreement.” Culture Machine, 4, 1–6.Google Scholar
2004. “Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony?” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Critchley S. and Marchart, O. 113–122. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. 2004. Laclau: A critical reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2011. The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
da Conceição-Heldt, E. 2013. “The EU’s paradigm shift from multilateralism to regionalism and bilateralism.” In Handbook of Global Economic Governance, ed. by Moschella, M. and Weaver, C., 57–69. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, L. 2014. “Capitalism as a Discursive System? Interrogating discourse theory’s contribution to critical political economy.” Critical Discourse Studies, 11(3): 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daly, G. 1991. “The discursive construction of economic space: Logics of organization and disorganization.” Economy and Society, 20(1): 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Radical(ly) political economy: Luhmann, postmarxism and globalization.” Review of International Political Economy, 11(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “The political economy of (im)possibility.” In International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics, ed. by De Goede, M., 177–194. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. 2014. "Neoliberalism: A bibliographic review." Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8): 309–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, B. and Stavrakakis, Y. 2017. “Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism.” Javnost-The Public, 24(4): 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, B., and Glynos, J. 2021. "Beyond populism studies." Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 178–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, B., Goyvaerts, J., Carpentier, N., Glynos, J., Stavrakakis, Y., and Trivundža, I. T. 2021a. “An introduction to the special issue on ‘Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice’.” Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, B., Goyvaerts, J., Carpentier, N., Glynos, J., and Stavrakakis, Y. 2021b. “Moving discourse theory forward: A five-track proposal for future research.” Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 22–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Goede, M. 2006. International political economy and poststructural politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Ville, F. and Orbie, J. 2014. "The European commission’s neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: Legitimizing continuity through subtle discursive change.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1): 149–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. 2015. TTIP: The truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
2018. "The role of ideas in legitimating EU trade policy: from the Single Market Programme to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” In The Handbook on the EU and International Trade, ed. by Khorana, S. and García, M., 243–262. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jodi. 2013. “Society Doesn’t Exist.” First Monday, 18(3).Google Scholar
Debord, G. 1992. The society of the spectacle. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
1988. Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Deere-Birkbeck, C., Monagle, C., Meléndez-Ortiz, R., Marchi, A. S., and Woods, N. 2009. Strengthening multilateralism: a mapping of proposals on WTO reform and global trade governance. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Delputte, S. and Orbie, J. 2018. “EU development policy.” In Handbook of European Policies, ed. by Heinelt, H. and Münch, S., 288–305. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Let’s abolish EU commissioner for development.” EUObserver. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
DeLuca, K. 1999. “Articulation theory: A discursive grounding for rhetorical practice.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 32(4): 334–348.Google Scholar
Demaria, F. and Kothari, A. 2017. “The Post-Development Dictionary agenda: paths to the pluriverse.” Third World Quarterly, 38(12): 2588–2599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, J. and Rowe, J. K. 2004. “Why poststructuralism is a live wire for the Left.” In Radical theory/critical praxis: Making a difference beyond the academy, ed. by Fuller, E. and Kitchin, R., 32–51. Vernon and Victoria: Praxis (e)Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1976. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
1981. Positions. London: Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
1988. “Signature Event Context.” In Limited Inc, ed by. Derrida, J., 1–24. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Devenney, M. 2004. “Ethics and politics in Discourse Theory.” In Laclau: A critical reader, ed. by Critchley, S. and Marchart, O., 123–139. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Devenney, M., Howarth, D., Norval, A. J., Stavrakakis, Y., Marchart, O., Biglieri, P., and Perelló, G. 2016. “Ernesto Laclau.” Contemporary Political Theory, 15(3): 304–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diez, T. 2014. "Setting the limits: Discourse and EU foreign policy.’ Cooperation and conflict, 49(3): 319–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingwerth, K. and Weinhardt, C. 2018. The Language of World Trade Politics: Unpacking the Terms of Trade. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyrberg, T. 2004. “The political and politics in discourse analysis.” In Laclau: A critical reader, ed. by Critchley, S. and Marchart, O., 241–255. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagleton T. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eberle, J. 2019. Discourse and Affect in Foreign Policy. Germany and the Iraq War. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgström, O. 2000. ‘Lomé and post-Lomé: asymmetric negotiations and the impact of norms.” European Foreign Affairs Review, 5: 175–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. G. 2013. “Post-hegemony and Gramsci: a bridge too far?” Contemporary Politics, 19(4): 427–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Errejón, Í., 2014. “Podemos as an Emerging Cultural Practice versus the Neoliberal Imaginary: Hegemony and Dissidence. Conversation with Íñigo Errejón Galván." IC Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación: 17–46Google Scholar
Errejón, Í., Mouffe, C., and Jones, O. 2016. Podemos: in the name of the people. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fanoulis, E., and Guerra, S. 2021. “Aporias in Greece and Spain’s Left-Wing Inclusionary Populism." New Political Science, 43(3): 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, A. 2004. “Political science, political ideas and rhetoric.” Economy and society, 33(4): 528–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “Rhetoric and the political theory of ideologies.” Political Studies, 60(4): 751–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Ideology and political rhetoric.” In The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, ed. by Freeden, M., Sargent, L., and Stears, M., 197–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, L. 2013. “EU trade governance and policy: a critical perspective.” Journal of Contemporary European Research. 9(4): 578–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1969/2013. Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1971. “Orders of discourse.” Social science information, 10(2): 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M. 2021. “Discourse, concepts, ideologies: Pausing for thought." Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 47–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1992/2006. The end of history and the last man. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Garo, I. 2019. Communisme et stratégie. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gauna, A. F. 2017. "Explaining populism beyond Laclau: A historical-comparative assessment of On Populist Reason." Thesis Eleven, 140(1): 38–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geist, M. 2010. “The trouble with the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement.” Review of International Affairs. 30(2): 137–147.Google Scholar
Geras, N. 1987. “Post-marxism?” New Left Review, 163(1): 40–82.Google Scholar
1988. "Post-marxism: A rejoinder." New Left Review, 169, 34–62.Google Scholar
Gheyle, N. 2016. “Adding fuel to the flames: How TTIP reinvigorated the politicization of trade.” Governance and Integration through Free Trade Agreements (GIFTA). Brussels.Google Scholar
2019. “Trade policy with the lights on. The origins, dynamics, and consequences of the politicization of TTIP.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ghent University.
Gheyle, N. and Jacobs, T. 2017a. “Inventing the Future.” Samenleving & Politiek, 25(5): 85–87.Google Scholar
2017b. “Content Analysis: a short overview.” Unpublished Working Paper, Ghent University.
Gibb, R. 2000. “Post-Lomé: the European Union and the South.” Third World Quarterly, 21(3): 457–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1997. “The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy.” Capital & Class, 21(2): 186–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
2010. “Forging post-development partnerships.” In The Handbook of local and regional development, ed. by Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Tomaney, J., 226–236. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. 2008. Anticapitalism and culture: Radical theory and popular politics. Oxford: Berg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giri, S. 2013. “Communism, occupy and the question of form.” Ephemera, 13(3): 577–601.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. 2021. "Critical fantasy studies." Journal of language and politics, 20(1): 95–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. “Structure, agency and power in political analysis: Beyond contextualised self-interpretations.” Political studies review, 6(2): 155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., and Speed, E. 2012. “Varieties of co-production in public services: time banks in a UK health policy context.” Critical Policy Studies, 6(4): 402–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Flitcroft, R., Love, C., Roussos, K., and Vazquez, J. 2021. "Logics, discourse theory and methods: Advances, challenges and ways forward." Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 62–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., Klimecki, R., and Willmott, H. 2015. "Logics in policy and practice: a critical nodal analysis of the UK banking reform process." Critical Policy Studies, 9(4): 393–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “Cooling out the marks: The ideology and politics of the financial crisis.” Journal of cultural economy, 5(3): 297–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., Speed, E., and West, K. 2015. “Logics of marginalisation in health and social care reform: Integration, choice, and provider-blind provision.” Critical Social Policy, 35(1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D. 2012. Debt: The first 5000 years. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Graham, J. 1988. “Post-modernism and Marxism.” Antipode, 20(1): 60–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griebel, T. 2016. “A Swig of Discourse against the ‘Dryness of the Tongue’. The Discursive Construction of Austerity in Germany.” Unpublished Working Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Prague.
Griggs, S. and Howarth, D. 2016. The politics of airport expansion in the United Kingdom: Hegemony, policy and the rhetoric of ‘sustainable aviation’. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griggs, S., and Howarth, D. 2019. Discourse, policy and the environment: hegemony, statements and the analysis of U.K. airport expansion. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5): 464–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guinam, J. and Hanna, T. 2017. “Lexit: The EU Is a Neoliberal Project, so Let’s Do Something Different When We Leave It.” New Statesman. Accessed on 29th of March 2020. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hak, G. 2017. Locating the Left in Difficult Times: Framing a Political Discourse for the Present. Berlin; Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. 2008a. “Laclauian discourse theory and the problems of institutions.” Unpublished Working Paper presented at the Second Global International Studies Conference, Ljubljana.
2008b. “The ontological primacy of the political? Some critical remarks.” Unpublished Working Paper presented at the World Conference in Ideology and Discourse Analysis, Roskilde.
2014. “Laclau and Mouffe and the ontology of radical negativity.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(3): 283–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. “Is Antagonism a Good Name for Radical Negativity? Review of Oliver Marchart’s ‘Thinking Antagonism’.” Ethics & Politics, 3, 533–542.Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, O. 2016. Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. 2014. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2018. A companion to Marx’s Capital: The complete edition. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2017. “The Interdependence of Intra-and Inter-Subjectivity in Constructivist Institutionalism.” Critical Review. 29(2): 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidenreich, T., Lind, F., Eberl, J. M., and Boomgaarden, H. 2019. “Media framing dynamics of the ‘European refugee crisis’: A comparative topic modelling approach.” Journal of Refugee Studies, 32(1): 172–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heron, T. and Murray-Evans, P. 2018. “The EU and Africa: trade, development and the politics of inter-regionalism.” In The Handbook on the EU and International Trade, ed. by Khorana S. and Garcia, M., 206–223. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heron, T. and Siles-Brügge, G. 2012. “Competitive liberalization and the ‘Global Europe’ services and investment agenda: Locating the commercial drivers of the EU–ACP economic partnership agreements.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2): 250–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschinger, E. 2012. “‘Hell is the other’: conceptualising hegemony and identity through discourse theory.” Millennium, 41(1): 65–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 1996. Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hoedemaekers, C. 2018. “Creative Work and Affect: Social, Political and Fantasmatic Dynamics in the Labour of Musicians.” Human Relations, 71(10): 1348–1370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holden, P. 2014. “Tensions in the discourse and practice of the European Union’s Aid for Trade.” Contemporary Politics, 20(1): 90–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. “Neo-liberalism by default? The European Union’s trade and development policy in an era of crisis.” Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(2): 381–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, M. 2002. The European Union and the Third World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse: Concepts in the Social Sciences. Maidenhead: Open University.Google Scholar
2004. “Hegemony, political subjectivity, and radical democracy.” In Laclau: a critical reader, ed. by Critchley, S. and Marchart, O., 256–276. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010. “Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies.” Critical policy studies, 3(3–4): 309–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Poststructuralism and after: Structure, subjectivity and power. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Ernesto Laclau: post-Marxism, populism and critique. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Marx, discourse theory and political analysis: negotiating an ambiguous legacy.” Critical Discourse Studies, 15(4): 377–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D. and Torfing, J. 2005. Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., Glynos, J. and Griggs, S. 2016. “Discourse, explanation and critique.” Critical Policy Studies. 10(1): 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howson, R. 2007. “From ethico-political hegemony to postmarxism.” Rethinking Marxism, 19(2): 234–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The Sociology of Postmarxism. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hudelson, R. 2003. “Book Review: Stuart Sim, Post-Marxism: An Intellectual History.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(1): 138–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, P. 2006. “The Concept of the Subject in Laclau.” Politikon 33(3): 299–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurt, S. 2003. “Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lomé Convention.” Third World Quarterly, 24(1): 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “The EU–SADC Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations: ‘locking in’the neoliberal development model in southern Africa?” Third World Quarterly, 33(3): 495–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutagalung, D. and Lubis, A. Y. 2018. “The political as the ontological primacy: On Ernesto Laclau’s thoughts.” In Cultural Dynamics in a Globalized World, ed. by Budianta, M., Budiman, M., Kusno, A., and Moriyama, M., 195–202. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. 2015. “The future of multilateralism: Governing the world in a post-hegemonic era.” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(3): 399–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, C. 2010. “Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices.” In European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. by Ilie, C., 57–78. London: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. 1996. Against the tide: An intellectual history of free trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ives, P. 2005. “Language, agency and hegemony: A Gramscian response to post-Marxism.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8(4): 455–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, T. 2016. “The language diplomats speak: a discourse-theoretical approach to the negotiations in the EURONEST parliamentary assembly.” EU Diplomacy Papers, 5, 1–36.Google Scholar
2018. "The dislocated universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An introduction to post-structuralist discourse theory." Critical Review, 30(3–4): 294–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a. "Poststructuralist discourse theory as an independent paradigm for studying institutions: Towards a new definition of ‘discursive construction’ in institutional analysis." Contemporary Political Theory, 18(3): 379–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b. “The strategic turn in post-Marxist discourse theory." Global Discourse. Accessed on 8th of April 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
2020. "Operationalizing heterogeneity in poststructuralist discourse theory: the heterogeneous logics of international trade politics." Critical Discourse Studies, 1–17.Google Scholar
2021. "Institutions and Political Strategy in Post-Marxist Discourse Theory: A Reply to Pedro Rey-Araújo." Rethinking Marxism, 33(1): 154–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, T. and Jacobs, G. 2021. “‘It is, perhaps more than ever before, a matter of participation’: ontological tension and boundary work in a free trade blog.” In Contesting the news: towards a postfoundational media linguistics, ed. by Declercq, J., Vandendaele, A., and Jacobs, G., 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jacobs, T. and Orbie, J. 2020. "Discourse theory as a novel approach for research on EU trade policy." In The Routledge Handbook of Critical European Studies, ed. by Bigo, D., Diez, T., Fanoulis, E., Rosamond, B., and Stivachtis, Y., 254–266. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, T. and Tschötschel, R. 2019. "Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach." International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(5): 469–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, T., Gheyle, N., De Ville, F., and Orbie, J. 2022. "The hegemonic politics of ‘strategic autonomy’ and ‘resilience’: COVID-19 and the dislocation of EU trade policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies, forthcoming. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, S. and Nanda, A. 2018. "Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility.” Applied Linguistics, 39(3): 373–399.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2013. "Putting neoliberalism in its time and place: A response to the debate." Social Anthropology, 21(1): 65–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. 2016. “Yanis Varoufakis’s fantasy politics.” Jacobin. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, K. 2006. “A Multilateralist Role for the EU?” In The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, ed. by Elgström, O. and Smith, M., 50–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015. "Discursively (de-) constructing European foreign policy: Theoretical and methodological challenges." Cooperation and conflict, 50(4): 492–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, M. W. and Phillips, L. J. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J. 2003. Hegemony: A realist analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. 2010. “The rhetoric of hegemony: Laclau, radical democracy, and the rule of tropes.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 43(3): 253–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karakatsanis, L. 2014. Turkish-Greek relations: Rapprochement, civil society and the politics of friendship. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsambekis, G. 2017. “The populist surge in post-democratic times: Theoretical and political challenges.” The Political Quarterly, 88(2): 202–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. 2022. “Between Autonomy and Representation: Toward a Post-Foundational Discourse Analytic Framework for the Study of Horizontality and Verticality.” Critical Discourse Studies, forthcoming. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitus, A. 2019. “The theory of hegemony: Laclau’s path not taken.” Philosophy & Social Criticism. 1–19.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. and Presner, T. S. 2002. The practice of conceptual history: timing history, spacing concepts. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., and Acosta, A. 2019. Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. 2016. “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society, 27(3): 308–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laatikainen, K. and Smith, K. 2006. The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralisms. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E, and Mouffe, C. 1981. “Socialist Strategy: Where Next?” Marxism Today, 25(1): 17–22.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. 1983. “The Impossibility of Society.” CTheory, 7(1–2): 21–24.Google Scholar
1989. “Politics and the Limits of Modernity.” Social Text, 21, 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. New Reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1991. “Intellectual Strategies. Memorandum to PhD Students in the IDA Programme.” Colchester: Essex University Press.Google Scholar
1996a. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
1996b. “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.” In Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. by Mouffe, C., 49–70. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1999. “Hegemony and the future of democracy: Ernesto Laclau’s political philosophy (interview).” In Race, Rhetoric, and the Postcolonial, ed. by Worsham L. and Olson, G., 129–164. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2001. “Can immanence explain social struggles?” Diacritics, 31(4): 2–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Glimpsing the future.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Critchley S. and Marchart, O., 279–328. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005a. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005b. “Heterogeneity and post-modernity.” Revista brasileira de literatura comparada, 7(7): 39–50.Google Scholar
2005c. “Populism: What’s in a Name.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. by Panizza, F., 32–49. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2014. The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Bhaskar, R. 1998. “Discourse theory vs critical realism.” Alethia, 1(2): 9–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 1987. “Post-Marxism without apologies.” New Left Review, 166(11–12): 79–106.Google Scholar
2014. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lamy, P. 2002. “Stepping stones or stumbling blocks? The EU’s approach towards the problem of multilateralism vs regionalism in trade policy.” World Economy, 25(10): 1399–1413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. 2011. World trade law after neoliberalism: Reimagining the global economic order. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. 2019. The left case against the EU. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
2018. “A Socialist Strategy for Europe.” Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Strategy, 1(3).Google Scholar
Larner, W. and Le Heron, R. 2002. “The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: a situated exploration of method.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20(6): 753–774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, H. 2018. "Discourse analysis in the study of European foreign policy." In Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, ed. by Kirchner, E., (62–80). Manchester University Press: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, O. 2015. “Using post-structuralism to explore the full impact of ideas on politics.” Critical Review, 27(2): 174–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Advancing Post-Structural Institutionalism: Discourses, Subjects, Power Asymmetries, and Institutional Change.” Critical Review, 30(3–4): 334–337.Google Scholar
Le Heron, E., Le Heron, R., and Lewis, N. 2011. “Performing research capability building in New Zealand’s social sciences: Capacity–capability insights from exploring the work of BRCSS’s ‘sustainability’ theme, 2004–09.” Environment and Planning, 43(6): 1400–1420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Heron, R. 2007. “Globalisation, governance and post-structural political economy: Perspectives from Australasia.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(1): 26–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Emerging neo-liberalising processes in New Zealand’s land-based sector: A post structural political economy framing using emergence diagrams.” Applied geography, 45, 392–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leal-Arcas, R. 2009. “The European Union and the BRIC Countries: Unilateralism, Bilateralism, and Multilateralism.” In The EU in the Global Political Economy, ed. by Laursen, F., 91–111. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Levi, M. and Murphy, G. H. 2006. “Coalitions of contention: The case of the WTO protests in Seattle.” Political Studies, 54(4): 651–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. and Bell, D. 2015. “(Why We Can’t) Let the Machines Do It: A Response to Inventing the Future.” The Disorder of Things. Accessed on the 24th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. and Nerghes, A. 2017. “Co-word maps and topic modeling: A comparison using small and medium-sized corpora (N< 1,000).” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4): 1024–1035. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macartney, H. Variegated neoliberalism: EU varieties of capitalism and international political economy. London: Routledge, 2010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, F. 2016. “Fissures in the Discourse-Scape: Critique, Rationality and Validity in Post-Foundational Approaches to CDS.” Discourse and Society, 27(3): 262–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maesse, J., and Nicoletta, G. C. 2021. "Translating Austerity. The Formation and Transformation of EU Economic Constitution as Discourse." Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 7(1): 61–94.Google Scholar
Maesse, J., Pühringer, S., Rossier, T., and Benz, P. 2022. Power and influence of economists: Contributions to the social studies of economics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Magnusson, L. 1994/2002. Mercantilism: the shaping of an economic language. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. 1994. “The rise of the regulatory state in Europe.” West European Politics, 17(3): 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marazzi, C. 2008. Capital and language: From the new economy to the war economy. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Marchart, O. 2004. “Politics and the ontological difference: on the ‘strictly philosophical’ in Laclau’s work.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Critchley S. and Marchart, O., 54–72. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2011. “Democracy and minimal politics: The political difference and its consequences.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 110(4): 965–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Institution and dislocation: Philosophical roots of Laclau’s discourse theory of space and antagonism.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(3): 271–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Thinking antagonism: Political ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Thinking "Thinking Antagonism". A Response. Ethics & Politics, 3, 607–621.Google Scholar
Marlière, P. 2019. "Jean-Luc Mélenchon and France Insoumise: The manufacturing of populism." In The populist radical left in Europe, ed. by Katsambekis, G. and Kioupkiolis, A., 93–112. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marques, M. 2010. “The public and private sphere in parliamentary debate.” In European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. by Ilie, C. 79–108. London: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. 2013. Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marttila, T. 2010. “Constrained constructivism in post-structural discourse analysis.” Sociologia Internationalis, 48(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Post-foundational discourse analysis: From political difference to empirical research. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
2019. Discourse, Culture and Organization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logo
Maslov, G. 2017. “A Methodological Program for Discourse Theory: Bridging the Gap between Explanation and Critique?” Unpublished Working Paper, University of Zadar.
Mathieu, J. F. and Weinblum, S. 2013. “The battle against unfair trade in the EU trade policy: A discourse analysis of trade protection.” Perspectives on European politics and society, 14(2): 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzolini, S. 2020. “Populism Is not Hegemony: Towards a Re-Gramscianization of Ernesto Laclau.” Theory & Event, 23(3): 765–786.Google Scholar
McGee, D. 1997. “Post-Marxism: The opiate of the intellectuals.” Modern Language Quarterly, 58(2): 201–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKean, B. 2016. “Toward an inclusive populism? On the role of race and difference in Laclau’s politics." Political Theory, 44(6): 797–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLennan, G. 1996. “Post-Marxism and the ‘four sins’ of modernist theorizing.” New Left Review, 218(2): 53–74.Google Scholar
McNay, L. 2013. “The Unbearable Lightness of Theory: Political Ontology and Social Weightlessness in Mouffe’s Radical Democracy.” In Gender, Agency, and Coercion, ed. by Madhok, S., Phillips, A., Wilson, K., & Hemmings, C., 64–83. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The misguided search for the political. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mesing, D. 2021. “Elements for a Theory of Strategy: History, Politics, and the Black Panther Party.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Villanova University.
Meunier, S. 2007. “Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiations.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4): 905–926. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, G. 2009. “Post-Marxism as Compromise Formation.” Cultural Logic: A Journal of Marxist Theory & Practice, 16, 1–74.Google Scholar
Miklitsch, R. 1995. “The Rhetoric of Post-Marxism: Discourse and Institutionality in Laclau and Mouffe, Resnick, and Wolff.” Social Text, 45, 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P. 2004. The effortless economy of science?. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. 2015. The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, with a new preface. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montessori, N. 2011. “The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies, 8(3): 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, D. 2013. “Tissue on the Bones’: Towards the Development of a Post-Structuralist Institutionalism.” Politics, 33(2): 112–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. 2018. For a left populism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. 1988. “Marxism or post-Marxism?” New Left Review, 167(1): 107–123.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. T. 2000. “The rise and fall of the multilateral agreement on investment: where now.” The International Lawyer, 34(3): 1033–1053.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4): 541–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda.” Comparative Political Studies, 51(13): 1667–1693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munyi, E. 2016. “Beyond asymmetry: Substantive beliefs in preference formation and efficiency of asymmetrical negotiations.” New Political Economy, 21(1): 49–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. 2004. “The Seattle WTO Protests: Building a Global Movement.” In Creating a better world: Interpreting global civil society, ed. by Taylor, R., 27–42. Sterling: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. and Pfaff, S. 2005. “Thinking locally, acting globally? What the Seattle WTO protests tell us about the global justice movement.” Political Power and Social Theory, 17, 151–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P., Jianwen L., and Welsch, H. 2006. “A conceptual history of entrepreneurial thought.” Journal of management history, 12(1): 12–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray-Evans, P. 2018. Power in North-South trade negotiations: making the European Union’s economic partnership agreements. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nabers, D. 2015. A poststructuralist discourse theory of global politics. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nee, V., and Swedberg, R. 2021. The Economic Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Negri, T. 2002. "Pour une définition ontologique de la multitude." Multitudes, 9, 36–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerghes, A. 2016. “Words in Crisis: A relational perspective of emergent meanings and roles in text.” Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
Newman, S. 2001. “Derrida’s deconstruction of authority.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(3): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Occupy and autonomous political life.” In Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today, ed. by Kioupkiolis, A. and Katsambekis, G., 103–120. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nonhoff, M. 2005. “Social Market Economy as a Hegemonic Project. An Exercise in Functionalist Discourse Analysis.” Unpublished Working Paper presented at Université Paris XII, Créteil, 1–21.
2006. Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie: Das Projekt ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
2007. “Hegemonic Analysis: on The Recent Development of Political Discourse Analysis in the Political Sciences.” Langage et société, 2, 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Hegemony analysis: Theory, methodology and research practice.” In Discourse, Culture and Organization, ed. by Marttila T., 63–104. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, A. 2002. “Against Antagonism: On Ernesto Laclau’s Political Thought.” Constellations, 9(4): 554–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Ernesto Laclau and the logic of ‘the political’.” Philosophy & social criticism, 32(1): 111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. 2004. “Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2): 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, R. 2021. Neither Vertical nor Horizontal: A Theory of Political Organization. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Orbie J. 2008. “The European Union’s Role in World Trade: Harnessing Globalization?” In Europe’s Global Role: External Policies of the European Union, ed. by Orbie, J., 35–66. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Orbie, J. 2007. “The development of EBA.” In European Union Trade Politics and Development, ed. by Faber, G. and Orbie, J., 36–58. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orbie, J. and De Ville, F. 2014. "‘A Boost to Our Economies that Doesn’t Cost a Cent’: EU Trade Policy Discourse Since the Crisis.” In EU foreign policy through the lens of discourse analysis: Making sense of diversity, ed. by Carta, C. and Morin, J. F., 95–110. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orbie, J. and Kerremans, B. 2013. “Theorizing European union trade politics: Contending or complementary paradigms?” Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9(4): 493–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orbie, J., Martens, D., Oehri, M., and Van den Putte, L. 2016. “Promoting sustainable development or legitimising free trade? Civil society mechanisms in EU trade agreements.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(4): 526–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, P. 1991. “Radicalism without limit? Discourse, democracy and the politics of identity.” In Socialism and the Limits of Liberalism, ed. by Osborn, P., 201–225. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ostermann, F. 2018. Security, defense discourse and identity in NATO and Europe: How France changed foreign policy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, R. 1991. A New View of Society: And, Report to the County of Lanark. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Palestrino, M. 2021. “Neglected times: Laclau, affect, and temporality.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 1–20.Google Scholar
Palmer, B. 1990. Descent into discourse: The reification of language and the writing of social history. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Palonen, E. 2018. “Performing the nation: the Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3): 308–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. “Democracy vs. demography: Rethinking politics and the people as debate.” Thesis Eleven, 1–16.Google Scholar
Panizza, F. and Miorelli, R. 2013. “Taking discourse seriously: Discursive institutionalism and post-structuralist discourse theory.” Political Studies, 61(2): 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. 2020. "Thinking Antagonism (by Way of Appropriation).” Ethics & Politics, 3, 555–580.Google Scholar
Phelan, S. 2007a. “The discourses of neoliberal hegemony: The case of the Irish Republic.” Critical Discourse Studies, 4(1): 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. “Messy grand narrative or analytical blind spot? When speaking of neoliberalism." Comparative European Politics, 5(3): 328–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Neoliberalism, media and the political. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phelan, S. and Dahlberg, L. 2011. Discourse theory and critical media politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prentoulis, M. and Thomassen, L. 2016. “Autonomy and Hegemony in the Squares: The 2011 Protests in Greece and Spain.” In Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today, ed. by Kioupkiolis, A. and Katsambekis, G., 213–234. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proksch, S., and Slapin, J. B. 2015. The politics of parliamentary debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purdue, D. 1995. “Hegemonic trips: world trade, intellectual property and biodiversity.” Environmental Politics, 4(1): 88–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games." International Organization, 42, 427–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remling, E. 2018. "Logics, assumptions and genre chains: a framework for poststructuralist policy analysis." Critical Discourse Studies, 15(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renard, T. 2016. “Partnerships for effective multilateralism? Assessing the compatibility between EU bilateralism, (inter-)regionalism and multilateralism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(1): 18–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resnick, S. and Wolff, R. 1989. Knowledge and class: A Marxian critique of political economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rey-Araújo, P. 2020. Capitalism, Institutions and Social Orders: The Case of Contemporary Spain. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. "Capitalism and Political Strategy in Post-Marxist Discourse Theory. Reply to Jacobs." Rethinking Marxism, 33(1): 162–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. 2009. “From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union’s ‘Grand Strategy’ through the Articulation of Discourse Theory.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4): 831–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rollo, J. 2006. “Global Europe: old mercantilist wine in new bottles?” The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations, 61(4): 403–414.Google Scholar
Rooksby, E. 2015. “Corbyn and the Left.” Jacobin. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P. and Valverde, M. 2006. ”Governmentality.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruccio, D. 1991. “Postmodernism and economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(4): 495–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. 1992. “Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution.” International organization, 46(3): 561–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rustin, M. 1988. “Absolute voluntarism: Critique of a post-Marxist concept of hegemony.” New German Critique, 43, 146–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs, W. 1992. The Development Reader. A Guide to Knowledge and Power, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sakalis, A. and Kaldor, M. 2016. “If the EU didn’t exist, we would have to invent it.” Open Democracy. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Salter, L. 2016. “Populism as a Fantasmatic Rupture in the Post-Political Order: Integrating Laclau with Glynos and Stavrakakis.” Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2): 116–132.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. 2008. “Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse.” Annual Review of Political. Science, 11, 303–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’.” European political science review, 2(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Speaking to the markets or to the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of the EU’s sovereign debt crisis.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1): 188–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “EU Leaders’ ideas and discourse in the eurozone crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis.” In EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity, ed. by Carta, C. and Morin, J. F., 245–264. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2017. “Theorizing ideas and discourse in political science: intersubjectivity, neo-institutionalisms, and the power of ideas.” Critical Review, 29(2): 248–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. 2017. "Europeanisation, stateness, and professions: What role do economic expertise and economic experts play in European political integration?" European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4(4): 430–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholz, R. 2018. Quantifying approaches to discourse for social scientists. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Selg, P. and Ventsel, A. 2008. “Towards a semiotic theory of hegemony: Naming as hegemonic operation in Lotman and Laclau.” Sign Systems Studies, 36(1): 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “An outline for a semiotic theory of hegemony.” Amsterdam: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Introducing relational political analysis: political semiotics as a theory and method. Berlin: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymour, R. 2015. “How Jeremy Corbyn Can Win.” Jacobin. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
2018. “The Brexit Debacle.” Jacobin. Accessed on the 29th of March 2022. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. 1993. Reading Adam Smith: Desire, History, and Value. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2006. “Adam Smith: Desire, History and Value.” In International political economy and poststructural politics, ed. by De Goede, M., 43–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, S. 2014. “Potentiality and impotentiality in JK Gibson-Graham.” Rethinking Marxism, 26(1): 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, E. 2005. “Constructing free trade: from Manchester boosterism to global management.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(2): 151–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siles-Brügge, G. 2011. “Resisting protectionism after the crisis: Strategic economic discourse and the EU–Korea free trade agreement.” New Political Economy, 16(5): 627–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “The power of economic ideas: A constructivist political economy of EU trade policy.” Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9(4): 597–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “EU trade and development policy beyond the ACP: subordinating developmental to commercial imperatives in the reform of GSP.” Contemporary Politics, 20(1): 49–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sim, S. 1998. Post-Marxism: A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2000/2013. Post-Marxism: An Intellectual History. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. M. 1998/2012. Laclau and Mouffe: The radical democratic imaginary. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2001. “Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smucker, J. 2017. Hegemony how-to: A roadmap for radicals. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
2014. "Can prefigurative politics replace political strategy?" Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 58, 74–82.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2007. “Theoretical approaches to governance network failure.” In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, ed. by Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., 95–110. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Springer, S. 2012. “Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism.” Critical discourse studies, 9(2): 133–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srnicek, N. and Williams, A. 2015. Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Stahl, R. M. 2019. “Ruling the interregnum: Politics and ideology in nonhegemonic times.” Politics & Society, 47(3): 333–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. 2002. Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Lacanian Left. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2021. “The (discursive) limits of (left) populism.” Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 162–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. and Katsambekis, G. 2014. “Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA.” Journal of political ideologies, 19(2): 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengel, F. A. and Nabers, D. 2019. “Symposium: The Contribution of Laclau’s Discourse Theory to International Relations and International Political Economy Introduction.” New Political Science, 41(2): 248–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, M. 2013. Writing global trade governance: Discourse and the WTO. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. 2016. How will capitalism end? Essays on a failing system. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Šumič, J. 2004. “Anachronism of Emancipation or Fidelity to Politics.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Critchley, S. and Marchart, O., 182–198. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sundell, T. 2021. “Toward a Post-Foundational Political Economy: Economism and Private Property as Capitalism’s Contingent Foundations.” New Political Science, 43(1): 6–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. 2017. Social movements and democracy in the 21st century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Invisible Committee 2009. The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
2014. To Our Friends. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Thelen, K. 2012. "Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity." Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 137–159.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. 2018. From Marxism to Post-Marxism? London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Thomassen, L. 2005a. “Antagonism, hegemony and ideology after heterogeneity.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(3): 289–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b. “Reading radical democracy: A commentary on Clive Barnett.” Political Geography, 24(5): 631–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Hegemony, populism and democracy: Laclau and Mouffe today.” Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 40, 161–176.Google Scholar
2019a. Discourse and Heterogeneity. In Discourse, Culture and Organization, ed. by Marttila, T., 43–61. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b. “Representing the people: Laclau as a theorist of representation.” New Political Science, 41(2): 329–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. “Introduction: New Reflections on Ernesto Laclau’s Theory of Populism.” Theory & Event, 23(3): 734–739.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. 2005. “Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges.” In Discourse theory in European politics, ed. by Howarth, D. and Torfing, J., 1–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tormey, S. and Townshend, J. 2006. Key thinkers from critical theory to post-Marxism. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Törnberg, A. and Törnberg, P. 2016a. “Combining CDA and topic modeling: Analyzing discursive connections between Islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum.” Discourse & Society, 27(4): 401–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. “Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis.” Discourse, Context & Media, 13, 132–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Townshend, J. 2003. “Discourse theory and political analysis: a new paradigm from the Essex School?” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(1): 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Laclau and Mouffe’s Hegemonic Project: The Story So Far.” Political Studies, 52(2): 269–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunderman, S. 2020. “Post-Marxist reflections on the value of our time. Value theory and the (in) compatibility of discourse theory and the critique of political economy.” Critical Discourse Studies, 18(6): 655–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. “Equivalence and Antagonism in Marx’s Theory of Value.” Rethinking Marxism, 33(1): 134–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Underwood, T. 2012. “Topic modeling made just simple enough.” The Stone and the Shell, 7.Google Scholar
Valdivielso, J. 2017. “The Outraged People: Laclau, Mouffe and the Podemos Hypothesis.” Constellations, 24(3): 296–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Apeldoorn, B. 2001. “The struggle over European order: Transnational class agency in the making of ‘embedded neo-liberalism’.” In Social forces in the Making of the New Europe, ed. by Bieler, A., 70–89. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Putte, L. and Orbie, J. 2015. “EU bilateral trade agreements and the surprising rise of labour provisions.” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 31(3): 263–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatter, M. 2012. “The quarrel between populism and republicanism: Machiavelli and the antinomies of plebeian politics.” Contemporary Political Theory, 11(3): 242–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venugopal, R. 2015. “Neoliberalism as concept.” Economy and Society, 44(2): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verbruggen, C. 2007. “Literary Strategy during Flanders’ Golden Decades (1880–1914): Combining Social Network Analysis and Prosopography.” In Prosopography Approaches and Applications: A Handbook, ed. by Keats-Rohan, K., 579–602. Oxford: Occasional Publications of the Unit for Prosopographical Research.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1977/2015. The role of providence in the social order: an essay in intellectual history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Viola, L., and Verheul, J. 2020. “Mining ethnicity: Discourse-driven topic modelling of immigrant discourses in the USA, 1898–1920.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35(4): 921–943. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vukasović, M., Birkholz, J., and Brankovic, J. 2019. “Is the Europe of Knowledge the talk of the town? Exploring how members of the European Parliament refer to higher education.” European Journal of Education, 54(1): 103–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. and Hay, C. 2003. “The discourse of globalisation and the logic of no alternative: rendering the contingent necessary in the political economy of New Labour.” Policy & Politics, 31(3): 289–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenman, M. 2003. “Laclau or Mouffe? Splitting the difference.” Philosophy & social criticism, 29(5): 581–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, K. 2011. “Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis." Critical Policy Studies, 5(4): 414–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. 2020. Political Hegemony and Social Complexity: Mechanisms of Power After Gramsci. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojczewski, T. 2018. India’s foreign policy discourse and its conceptions of world order: the quest for power and identity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. 1983. “Marxism Without Class Struggle?” Socialist Register, 20: 239–271.Google Scholar
1998. The Retreat from Class: A New “True” Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2007. Democracy against capitalism; Renewing historical materialism. Delhi: Aakar Books.Google Scholar
Worth, O. 2017. “Whither Lexit?” Capital & Class, 41(2): 351–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziai, A. 2007. Exploring post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zicman de Barros, T. 2021. Desire and Collective Identities: Decomposing Ernesto Laclau’s notion of demand. Constellations, 28(4): 511–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowksi, J. and Breeze, R. 2019. Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist Discourses Across the Political Spectrum. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, J. 2017. Articulations of self and politics in activist discourse. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Politics and the political in critical discourse studies: state of the art and a call for an intensified focus on the metapolitical dimension of discursive practice.” Critical Discourse Studies, 16(2): 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, J. and De Cleen, B. 2017. “De-legitimizing labour unions: On the metapolitical fantasies that inform discourse on striking terrorists, blackmailing the government and taking hard-working citizens hostage.” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 176: 1–30.Google Scholar
Zienkowski, J., and De Cleen, B. 2020. “The polyphonic critique of trade unions: unpacking the logics of union critical discourse." Critical Discourse Studies, 18(5): 519–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar