Cover not available
Part of
Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 1–22

Chapter 1
Conspiracy theory discourses

Critical inquiries into the language of anti-science, post-trutherism, mis/disinformation and alternative media

ORCID logo | University of Turin
 | University of Bergamo
ORCID logo | University of Turin
Article outline
  • 1.The nature of conspiracy theories, old and new
  • 2.The need for a discourse approach to conspiracy theories (and to those who oppose them)
  • 3.Structure of the book
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.01dem
References (44)
References
Allam, Hannah. 2020. “Right-Wing Embrace of Conspiracy is ‘Mass Radicalization,’ Experts Warn” NPR, December 15, 2020. Available at [URL]. Accessed on 18 December 2020.
Barkun, Michael. 2013. A Culture of Conspiracy. Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bergmann, Eirikur. 2018. Conspiracy and Populism: The Politics of Misinformation. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1978. Fascists: A Social Psychology of the National Front. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Anti-Semitic Themes and the British Far Left: Some Social-Psychological Observations on Indirect Aspects of the Conspiracy Tradition.” In Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy, ed. by Graumann, C. F., Moscovici, S., 115–136. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2020. “Jan Blommaert on QAnon, conspiracy theories and why they’re persuasive.” [URL] (accessed 13 June 2021).
Butter, Michael. 2020. The Nature of Conspiracy Theories, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight. 2015. “Bridging the Great Divide: Conspiracy Theory Research for the 21st Century.” Diogenes 62: 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2020. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byford, Jovan. 2011. Conspiracy Theories. A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
conspiracytheories.eu COMPACT (Comparative Analysis of Conspiracy Theories in Europe)
Constantinou, Marios, Kagialis Antonios, and Maria Karekla. 2021. “COVID-19 Scientific Facts vs. Conspiracy Theories: Is Science Failing to Pass Its Message?” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18/6343. DOI logo. PMID: 34208154; PMCID: PMC8296162.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Deschrijver, Cedric. 2021. “On the Metapragmatics of ‘Conspiracy Theory’: Scepticism and Epistemological Debates in Online Conspiracy Comments.” Journal of Pragmatics, in press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Karen M., Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Advances in Political Psychology 40 (1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. ”Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies, Volume 2, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archeology of Knowledge. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
Gove, Michael. 2016. “‘Gove: Britons “Have Had Enough of Experts’.” SkyNews interview with Faisal Islam, June 3, 2016. [URL]
Harambam, Jaron. 2020. Contemporary Conspiracy Culture. Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harambam, Jaron, and Stef Aupers. 2015. “Contesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 24/4:466–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2013. “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2011: Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Tester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” Harper’s Magazine: 77–86. [URL] Retrieved on May 5, 2021.
Keeley, Brian L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2017. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS).” In Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1993. ”Power and Representation.” In Politics, Theory and Contemporary Culture, ed. by Mark Poster, 277–296. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Boston: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1987. “The Conspiracy Mentality.” In Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. Springer Series in Social Psychology, ed. by Carl F. Graumann, and Serge Moscovici. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, Russell, & Nancy L. Rosenblum. 2019. A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Prinnceton-Oxford: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve, and Thierry Herman. 2016. “Argumentation, Conspiracy and the Moon: a Rhetorical-pragmatic Analysis.” In Case Studies in Discourse Analysis, ed. by Marcel Danesi, and Sara Greco, 295–330. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Oxford Languages. 2016. “Word of the Year 2016.” [URL] Accessed on 6 May 2021
Popper, Karl R. 1972. “The Conspiracy Theory of Society.” In Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 4th ed., 165–168. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Procházka, Ondřej, and Jan Blommaert. 2021. “Ergoic Framing in New Right Online Groups: Q, the MAGA Kid, and the Deep State Theory.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 44 (1): 4–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prooijen, Jan-Willem, & Karen M. Douglas. 2018. “Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Basic Principles of an Emerging Research Domain”. European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (7): 897–908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shipman, Tim. 2017. All Out War: The Full Story of Brexit. Revised edition. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. and Vermeule, Adrian. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uscinski, Joseph E. 2019. “Down the rabbit hole we go!” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, ed. by Joseph E. Uscinski, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020. Conspiracy Theories. A Primer. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The Politics of Fear. The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. Second edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, & Michael Meyer (eds.). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Third edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Demata, Massimiliano
2024. Chapter 5. The legitimation of conspiracy theories through manipulation. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Saskia
2024. Political homophobia. Journal of Language and Politics 23:6 ► pp. 808 ff. DOI logo
Olson, Laura
2023. Internet Usage, YouTube, and Conspiracy-Mindedness in the United States. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 10:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.