Variability of persuasive message effects
Meta-analytic evidence and implications
This paper reports new information concerning the variability of the persuasive effects of variables across messages. Evidence from meta-analytic reviews of persuasive effects research indicates that such variability is common and substantial, even under well-specified experimental conditions. The implications of this evidence for the design, analysis, and interpretation of research on persuasive message effects are discussed.
Keywords: Persuasion, Message Effects, Variability of message effects
Published online: 04 July 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.1.2.02oke
https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.1.2.02oke
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Guerini, Marco, Oliviero Stock, Massimo Zancanaro, Daniel J. O’Keefe, Irene Mazzotta, Fiorella de Rosis†, Isabella Poggi, Meiyii Y. Lim & Ruth Aylett
2011.
In Emotion-Oriented Systems [Cognitive Technologies, ],
► pp. 559 ff. 
Hoeken, Hans & Daniel J O’Keefe
2022. The reconstructability of persuasive message variables affects the variability of experimental effect sizes: evidence and implications.
Human Communication Research 48:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Jackson, Sally & Jodi Schneider
2018. Cochrane Review as a “Warranting Device” for Reasoning About Health.
Argumentation 32:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
O'Keefe, Daniel J. & Scott L. Hale
2001. An odds‐ratio‐based meta‐analysis of research on the door‐in‐the‐face influence strategy.
Communication Reports 14:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Reichert, Tom, Susan E. Heckler & Sally Jackson
2001. The Effects of Sexual Social Marketing Appeals on Cognitive Processing and Persuasion.
Journal of Advertising 30:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Slater, D. Michael, Jochen Peter & Patti M. Valkenburg
2015. Message Variability and Heterogeneity: A Core Challenge for Communication Research.
Annals of the International Communication Association 39:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Turner, Monique Mitchell, Shuo Yao, Ryanne Baker, Jodi Goodman & Stephanie A. Materese
2010. Do Lay People Prepare Both Sides of an Argument? The Effects of Confidence, Forewarning, and Expected Interaction on Seeking Out Counter-Attitudinal Information.
Argumentation and Advocacy 46:4 ► pp. 226 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.