Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 10:1 (1993) ► pp.131134
References
Ambrosini, Ricardo
1986Review of Hock (1986). Linguistica e letteratura 111.213–219.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1972An Introduction to Comparative and Historical Linguis-tics. New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed., Comparative and Historical Linguis-tics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred
1986Review of Hock (1986). Zeitschrift für verglei-chende Sprachforschung 991.318.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry
1987An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. (= Linguis-tics series , 11.) Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: Univ. of Papua New Guinea Press; Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies, Univ. of the South Pacific. (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press 1993.)Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila
1986Review of Hock (1986). Diachronica 31.203–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin-New York-Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
1989Review of Hock (1986). Language 651.162–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. & Angela Delia Volpe
1988Review of Hock (1986). Studies in Language 121.457–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1962Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (2nd ed., ibid. 1973; 3rd ed., London & New York: Routledge 1993.)Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim
1989 “One Thousand and One Principles of Historical Linguistics”. English Studies 701.441–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

MAKINO, Kenji
2016. A Study on the Therapeutic Effect of <i>Jumihaidokuto</i> in Patients with Acne Vulgaris with Inflammatory Lesions. Nishi Nihon Hifuka 78:3  pp. 270 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.