Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 11:2 (1994) ► pp.272–278
Book review

S[ergej] A. Starostin. Altajskaja problema i proiskhozhdenie japonskogo jazyka [The Altaic problem and the origin of the Japanese language].
Moskva: Izd. “Nauka”, 1991. 296 pp.

Reviewed by
| MRM Language Research Center
Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.11.2.11kri
References
Azerbaev, E. G.
1982 Voprosy japonsko-tjurkskix jazykovyx svjazej. Avto-ref. cand. filol. nauk. Moskva.Google Scholar
1986 “O leksike japonskogo i tjurkskix jazykov, svjazannoj s terminami rodstva”. Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 61.59–68.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955 Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer verglei-chenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Choy, Hakkun
1977 Hankwuk pangen sacen [Korean dialect dictionary]. Seoul: Myeng munsa.Google Scholar
Cincius, V[era] I.
ed. 1972 Ocerki sravniteV noj leksikologii altajskix jazy-kov. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Clark, Larry V.
1977 “Mongol Elements in Old Turkic?”. Journal de la Soci-ete Finno-Ougrienne 751.110–168.Google Scholar
Clauson, Sir Gerard
1972 An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard
1975 “Proto-Turkic: Reconstruction problems”. Turk Dili Arastirmalari Yilligi Belletin.Google Scholar
1978 “Urtungusiseh *ö”. Tungusica ed. by Michael Weiers, vol.11, 66–116. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1985 Mongolo-Tungusica. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kang, Kil Wun
1988 Hankwuk-e Kye Thong Non [Issues on the origin of the Korean language]. Seoul: Yeng Sel Chwulphansa.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, Joseph Etienne
1844–49 Dictionnaire mongol-russe-franqais. 31 vols. Kazan: Kazan Univ.Google Scholar
Krippes, Karl A.
1989 Review of Kang (1988). Diachronica 61.141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 “The Mongol-Tungusic Relationship: A historiography”. Gen-eral Linguistics 30:3.165–187.Google Scholar
1991 “A Linguistic Enigma: The Altaic numerals”. General Linguis-tics. 31:3/4.141–152.Google Scholar
1992 The Reconstruction of Proto-Mongolian *p-. Ph.D. disser-tation, Dept. of Uralic & Altaic Studies, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Krueger, John R.
1958 Review of Ramstedt (1957b). Central Asiatic Journal 41.220–222.Google Scholar
Lessing, Ferdinand D.
, et al. 1960 Mongolian-English Dictionary. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. (Repr., Bloomington, Ind.: Mongolia Society 1973.)Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew
1971 Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. Chi-cago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Musaev, K. M.
1987 “Altajskaja gipoteza v svete kontaktov tjurkskix jazykov s jazykami mira”. Sovetskaja Tjurkologija 41.52–59.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1954 “Remarks on Some Roots and Stems in Mongolian”. Silver Jubilee Volume of the Zinbun Kagaku Kenkyusyo, 294–300. Kyoto: Univ. of Kyoto.Google Scholar
1960 Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen. Teil 1: Vergleichende Lautlehre . Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rasanen, Martti
1969 Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türk-sprachen. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Ramsey, S. Robert
1978a Accent and Morphology in Korean Dialects. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar
1978b “S-Clusters and Reinforced Consonants”. Papers in Korean Linguistics ed. by Chin-Wu Kim, 59–66. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1991 “Proto-Korean and the Origin of Korean Accent”. Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages ed. by William G. Boltz & Michael C. Shapiro, 215–238. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramstedt, G[ustaf] J[ohn]
1935a Kalmuckisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1935b Studies in Korean Etymology. (= Memoires de la Societe Finno-Ougrienne , 951.) Ibid. [Vol.111, ed. by Pentti Aalto, ibid 1953.]Google Scholar
1957b Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft. Band I: Lautlehre. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Pentti Aalto. (= Memoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne , 104:1.) Ibid.Google Scholar
1957b Vvedenie v altajskoe jazykoznanie: Morfologija. [Translated from the German by L. S. Slon.]. Moskva: Izd. Inostrannoj Literatury.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, Andras
1974 “Obscee nasledie ili zaimstvovanija? (K probleme rodstva altajskix jazykov)”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 21:2.31–45.Google Scholar
1978 “Julius Nemeth: Life and work”. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 321.261–284.Google Scholar
1981 “The Character of Hungarian-Bulgaro-Turkic Relations”. Studia Turcologica ed. by Gy. Kaldy-Nagy, 5th ed., 119–128. Budapest: Aka-demiai Kiado.Google Scholar
ed. 1982 Chuvash Studies. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rozycki, William Vincent
1983 Mongol Elements in Manchu. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Uralic & Altaic Studies, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind..Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul
1993 “Letter to the Editor”. Mother Tongue: Newsletter of the Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory, No. 19 (Spring 1993), 29–31.Google Scholar
Sčerbak, A. M.
1970 Sravnitel’ naja fonetika tjurkskix jazykov. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Yu, Changton
1964 Ico sacen [Yi dynasty dictionary]. Seoul: Yensei Univ. Press.Google Scholar