Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 15:2 (1998) ► pp. 341348
References
Bomhard, Allan R.
1984Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 271.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1992 “The Nostratic Macrofamily (with special reference to Indo-European)”. Word 43:1.61–83.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R. & John Kerns
1994Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor
1988Afrasian Languages. Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
1992Proto-Afrasian and Old Akkadian: A study in historical phonetics. (= Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 4:1/2.) Princeton, N.J.: Institute of Semitic Studies.Google Scholar
Ehret, Christopher
1995Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian): Vowels, tone, consonants, and vocabulary. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Tomaz V. & Ivanov Vjaceslav Vs.
1972 “Lingvističeskaja tipo-logija i rekonstrukcija sistemy indoevropejskix smyčnyx”. Konferencija po sravniteV no-istorideskoj grammatike indoevropejskix jazykov ed. by S. B. Bernstejn et al., 15–18. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1984Indoevropejskij jazyk i indoevropejcy. 21 vols. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State Univ.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugene A.
1987 “A ‘New Approach’ to Nostratic Comparison: Review of Allan R. Bomhard, Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic [Bomhard 1984]”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 107:1.97–100.Google Scholar
Illich-Svitych, Vladislav M.
1965 “Materialy k sravnitel’ nomu slovarju nostratideskix jazykov (indoevropejskij, altajskij, ural’skij, dravidskij, kartvel’-skij, semitoxamitskij)”. Etimologija 1965.321–373.Google Scholar
1971Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskix jazykov (semito-xamitskij, kartvel’ skij, indoevropejskij, ural’ skij, dravidskij, altajskij). Slovar’ b-K. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1976Opyt sravnenija nostratideskix jazykov (semitoxamitskij, kartvel’ skij, indoevropejskij, ural’skij, dravidskij, altajskij). Sravnitelnyj slovar’ l-z. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1984Opyt sravnenija nostratideskix jazykov (semitoxamitskij, kartvel’skij, indoevropejskij, ural’skij, dravidskij, altajskij). Sravnitelnyj slovar’ p-q. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Manaster Ramer, Alexis
1994 “Clusters or Affricates in Kartvelian and Nostratic”. Diachronica 11:2.157–170.Google Scholar
Manaster Ramer, Alexis & Paul J. Sidwell
1997 “The Truth about Strahlenberg’s Classification of the Languages of Northeastern Eurasia”. Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne 871.139–160.Google Scholar
McAlpin, David
1981Proto-Elamo-Dravidian: The evidence and its implications. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Orël, Vladimir & Stolbova Olga
1995Hamito-Semitic Etymological Dictio-nary: Materials for a reconstruction. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1960Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen. Teil 1: Vergleichende Lautlehre . Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Pejros, Ilja & Shnirelman Viktor
1989 “Toward an Understanding of Proto-Dravidian Prehistory”. Reconstructing Languages and Cultures ed. by Vitaly Shevoroshkin, 70–71. Bochum: Norbert Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1997 “Des Ablauts gemeiner Gegner: Laryngale”. Dhum-badji! Journal for the History of Language 3:1.15–31.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul
1996Review of Bomhard & Kerns (1994). Word 47:3.456–464.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej A.
1989 “Nostratic and Sino-Caucasian”. Explorations in Language Macrofamilies ed. by Vitaly Shevoroshkin, 42–66. Bochum: Nor-bert Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
1991Altajskaja problema i proisxozdenie japonskogo jazyka. Mos-cow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Strahlenberg, Philipp Johann von
1730Das Nord- und Ostliche Theil von Europa und Asia. In so weit solches Das ganze Russische Reich mit Sibirien und das grossen Tatarey in sich begrijffet, In einer Historisch-Geographi-schen Beschreibung der alten und neuern Zeiten, und vielen andern unbe-kannten Nachrichten vorgestellet, Nebst einer noch niemals ans Licht ge-gebenen Tabula Polyglotta von zwey und dreyssigerley Arten Tatarischer Völcker Sprachen und einem Kalmuckischen Vocabulario. Sonder lich aber Einer grossen richtigen Land-Charte von den benannten Landern und von verschiedenen Kupfferstichen, so die Asiatische-Scythische Antiquitat betref-fen; Bey Gelegenheit der Schwedischen Kriegs-Gefangenschaft in Russland, aus eigener sorgfaltigen Erkundingung, auf denen verstatteten weitten Reisen zusammen gebracht und ausgefertiget. Stockholm: In Verlegung des Autoris. (Repr., with an introduction and bibliography by John R. Krueger, Szeged 1975, as No.81 of Studia Uralo-Altaica. [To be obtained through John Benja-mins Publ. Co. of Amsterdam & Philadelphia].)Google Scholar
Trask, Lawrence
1994/95 “Basque: The search for relatives”. Dhumbadji! Journal for the History of Language 2:1.3–54.Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
1994 “Long-Distance Relationships, Reconstruction Meth-odology, and the Origins of the Japanese”. Diachronica 11:1.95–114.Google Scholar