Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:1 (2018) ► pp. 107–143

Near done; awful stable; really changing

The suffixless adverb in dialects of the UK

| University of Toronto
This paper examines adverb formation with -ly, e.g., slow/slowly, and uses a large archive of synchronic dialects to uncover the current state and historical trajectory of this process. The results reveal that English adverbs are a variegated system. The intensifying adverb really is a frequent form while sentential adverbs appear to be a newer layer in the system. In contrast, manner adverbs are constrained by the semantic interpretation of the adverb as abstract or concrete. These results expose the complexity of the English adverb system and demonstrate that adverb formation is an ideal site for uncovering historical processes in synchronic data.
Keywords: morphological variation, British dialects, variation and change, -ly adverbs, adverb formation
Published online: 16 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16027.tag
References

References

[Boswell] Pottle, Fred
1762 Boswell’s London journal 1762–1763. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edwin Abbott
1879 A Shakespearian grammar. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alford, Henry
1864 A plea for the Queen’s English: Stray notes on speaking and spelling. London: Strahan.Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence
2009 ANT CONC 3.1.0. A freeware concordance program for Windows. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp​/software​.html (13 December 2017).
Anttila, Raimo
1989 Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald, Doug Davidson & Douglas Bates
2008 Mixed-effect modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carroll, Ruth
2008 Historical English phraseology and the extender tag. Selim 15. 7–37.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
1982 Variation in an English dialect: A sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö
2010 Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, Morton
1991 Adverb form in Middle English. English Studies 72. 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Draat, P. Fijn van
1910 Rhythm in English prose. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Emma, Ronald David
1964 Milton’s grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku
2008 Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In Bernd Kortmann & Clive Upston (eds.), Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles, 328–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1991 Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. In Manfred Görlach (ed.), Englishes: Studies in varieties of English 1984–1988, 90–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, William. & David Murison
(eds.) 1931–1976 The Scottish national dictionary. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Greenough, James Bradstreet & George Lyman Kittredge
1901 Words and their ways in English speech. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
[ p. 140 ]
Hedevind, Bertil
1967 The dialect of Dentdale in the West Riding of Yorkshire. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986 Principles of historical linguistics. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur & Peter Trudgill
1979 English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of British English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2003  Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32(2). 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto H.
1961 A modern English grammar on historical principles, part 6: Morphology. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1964 Essentials of English grammar. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1971 Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1). 97–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985 Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 43–70. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leeds, Winifred
1974 Herfordshire speech: The south-west midland dialect as spoken in Herefordshire and its environs. Upton Crews: M. Spurway.Google Scholar
Liddle, Roy
1999 A comparative study of the dual-form adverb lexemes quick and slow . Växjö, Sweden: Växjö University.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
1762/1775 A short introduction to English grammar. London: Printed by J. Hughs for A. Millar and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl
1882 Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Kassel: Wgand.: Kromayer, Johannes 1986 [1618].Google Scholar
Macafee, Caroline
2001 Lowland sources of Ulster Scots. In John Kirk & Donall Ó Baoill (eds.), Languages links: The languages of Scotland and Ireland, 121. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S.
1995 The adverbs of authority. English World-Wide 16(1). 37–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, William
1938 Cockney past and present: A short history of the dialect of London. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry Louis
1961 The American language: Supplement II. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
1962 The American language. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960 A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1991 But, only, just: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique.Google Scholar
1994a Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994b Diachronic issues in English adverb derivation. In Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds.), Creating and using English language corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language on Computerized Corpora, Zürich 1993, 139–147. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
[ p. 141 ]
1997 The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds.), Grammaticalization at work: Studies of long term developments in English, 145–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Opdahl, Lise
2000a LY or zero suffix? A study in variation of dual-form adverbs in present-day English, vol. 2. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2000b LY or zero suffix? A study in variation of dual-form adverbs in present-day English, vol. 1. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Partridge, Astly Cooper
1969 Tudor to Augustan English: A study in syntax and style from Caxton to Johnson. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans
1992 English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition: Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990, 529–545. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1994 Degree adverbs in early modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 269–288. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pounder, Amanda
2001 Adverb marking in German and English: System and standardization. Diachronica 18(3). 301–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Hapology in English adverb-formation. In Christian J. Kay, Carole A. Hough & Irené Wotherspoon (eds.), New perspectives in English Historical Linguistics, 193–211. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Norm consciousness and corpus constitution in the study of earlier Modern Germanic languages. In Stephan Elspass, Nils Langer, Wim Vandenbussche & Joachim Scharloth (eds.), Germanic language histories from below (1700–2000), 275–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Adverb-marking patterns in Earlier Modern English coordinate constructions. In Marina Dossena, Richard Drury & Maurizio Gott (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006, 183–201. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1926 A grammar of Late Modern English. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1972 A grammar of contemporary English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffry Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2007 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.R​-project​.org (13 December 2017.)
Ramisch, Heinrich
1989 The variation of English in Guernsey/Channel Islands. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rice, Wallace
1927 Go slow – Proceed slowly. American Speech September. 489–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti & Minna Palander-Collin
1993 Early English in the computer age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robertson, Stuart
1954 The development of Modern English. Revised by Frederic G. Cassidy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ross, Claudia N.
1984 Adverbial change: Implications for a theory of lexical change. In David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics, 243–249. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
[ p. 142 ]
Schibsbye, Knud
1965 A Modern English grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Walt Wolfram
1999 Alternative models of dialect death: Dissipation vs. contraction. Language 75(3). 486–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aigmer
2007 The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer
2000 Synchrony and diachrony in the evolution of English: Evidence from Scotland. York: University of York dissertation.Google Scholar
Storm, Johan
1892 Englische Philologie. Leipzig: Reisland.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, James D. Malley & Gerhard Tutz
2009 An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and Random Forests. Psychological Methods 14(4). 323–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Michael
1980 Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril
1988 The development of sentence adverbs in English. Studia Linguistica 42(1). 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Adverbialization and subject-modification in Old English. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 453–456. Berlin: Mouton du Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
1997 Obsolescence in the English Perfect? Evidence from Samaná English. American Speech 72(1). 33–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Historical change in synchronic perspective: The legacy of British dialects. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), Handbook of the history of English, 477–506. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008  So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics, Intensifiers, Belén Mendez-Naya (ed.) 12(2). 361–394.Google Scholar
2013 Roots of English: Exploring the history of dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., Mercedes Durham & Jennifer Smith
2014 Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future ‘be going to’ in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 75–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Rika Ito
2002 Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2). 236–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Jennifer Smith
(2018) Obviously undergoing change: Adverbs of evidentiality in the UK and Canada over 100 years. Fourth International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE 4), London, England, August 2018Google Scholar
Tidholm, Hans
1979 The dialect of Egton in North Yorkshire. Gothenburg: Bokmaskine.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J.
1990 The dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uhler, Karl
1926 Die bedeutungsgleichhheit der altenglischen adjektiva und adverbia mit und ohne -ic (lice). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich
1988 Syntax der englischen Adverbialen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 143 ]
Wolfram, Walt & Natalie Schilling-Estes
2006 American English. 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil
1927 A short history of English. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Zettersten, Arne
1969 The English of Tristan da Cunha. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar