Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:3 (2019) ► pp.384–416

The role of atypical constellations in the grammaticalization of German and English passives

| Université de Neuchâtel
| Western Sydney University
| Université de Neuchâtel
In this paper we propose an alternative scenario for the grammaticalization of passive constructions in German and English. According to the received view, the development starts with the frequent combinations of copula verbs with past participles, which then increasingly gain in frequency during the grammaticalization process. In contrast to the received view, we argue that marginal – i.e., atypical and infrequent – constellations of constructions play an important role in the grammaticalization process. These constellations are ambiguous in their interpretation, and consequently have an inherent potential to trigger semantic reinterpretation and syntactic reanalysis. The alternative scenario is more consistent with theoretical considerations and the patterns in corpus data of German and English between 1050 and 1350. Our paper supports the hypothesis that the grammaticalization of the passive in German started from constellations of the become copula with past participles of atelic verbs, i.e., activities and semelfactives. By contrast, no such change can be observed in the corresponding construction in English. We discuss the implications of our findings for constructional change and grammaticalization in general.
Keywords: passive, copula verbs, aspect, aktionsart, grammaticalization, German, English, Middle High German, Old English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The grammaticalization of passive constructions in English and German
  • 3.Grammaticalization of German and English passives: An alternative view
    • 3.1Background
    • 3.2Source constructions
    • 3.3Resolution of mismatch: Hypotheses
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16033.smi
References
Agresti, Alan
2007 An introduction to categorical data analysis. 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas
2011 A web of words: Lexical meaning in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
2006 The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology, 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ayala
1980 On the graphical display of the significant components in two-way contingency tables. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 9(10). 1025–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2012 The course of actualization. Language 881. 601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana
2012 Lexical aspect. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 721–751. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flach, Susanne
Forthcoming. From movement into action to manner of causation: Changes in argument mapping in the into-causative. Linguistics.
Gaeta, Livio
2018 Im Passiv sprechen in den Alpen. In Elena Smirnova & Robert Mailhammer (eds.), Aktuelle Ansichten zur Synchronie und Diachronie von Passivkonstruktionen. Special Issue of Sprachwissenschaft 43(2). 221–250.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2015 Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(3). 897–938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Passive participles across languages. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Joachim Buscha
2001 Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd, revised edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1997 The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard
2009 Aktionsart in the Old High German passive with special reference to the Tatian and Isidor translations. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Klein, Thomas, Klaus-Dieter Wegera, Stefanie Dipper, & Claudia Wich-Reif
2016 Referenz-korpus Mittelhochdeutsch (1050–1350), Version 1.0, [URL]. ISLRN 332-536-136-099-5.
Kotin, Michail L.
2003 Die werden-Perspektive und die werden-Periphrasen im Deutschen. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lauwers, Peter & Dominique Willems
2011 Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics 49(6). 1219–1235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Rule classes and syntactic change. Linguistic Inquiry 101. 83–108.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2007 Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkung – Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 351. 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert & Elena Smirnova
2013 Incipient grammaticalization: Sources of passive constructions in English and German. In Gabriele Diewald, Ilse Wischer & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), Comparative studies in early Germanic languages: With a focus on verbal categories, 41–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David, Achim Zeileis & Kurt Hornik
2003 Visualizing independence using extended association plots. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing, 1–8. [URL]
2016 vcd: Visualizing categorical data. R package version 1.4-3.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2004 Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 151. 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In Jan-Ola Oestman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 45–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman
1988 Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2). 15–28.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2000 Prinzipien der Irregularisierung: Eine kontrastive Untersuchung von zehn Verben in zehn germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara & Mats Roth
1983 Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity in meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter & Hubert Cuyckens
2009 Constructional change in Old and Middle English copular constructions and its impact on the lexicon. Folia Linguistica Historica 301. 311–366.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter
2014 Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Rapp, Irene
1996 Zustand? Passiv? – Überlegungen zum sogenannten „Zustandspassiv“. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15(2). 231–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, Victor
1962 Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1997 The parameter of aspect. 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonnenhauser, Barbara
2006 Yet there’s method in it: Semantics, pragmatics and the interpretation of the Russian imperfective aspect. Munich: Sager.Google Scholar
Toyota, Junichi
2008 Diachronic change in the English passive. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2011 The grammaticalization of passives. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 535–546. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
2007 A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics 39(5). 990–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Flach, Susanne
2021. From movement into action to manner of causation: changes in argument mapping in the into-causative. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.