Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 34:4 (2017) ► pp. 437469
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
2012The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48.1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Huyim
1986 ‘-ci’wa phitong [ -ci and passive ] (Kwukehak Sinyenkwu 1 [New Studies on Korean 1]). Seoul: Thap Press.Google Scholar
1988Kwukephitongyenkwu [Studies on the Korean passive]. Seoul: Kolyetay Mincok Mwunhwa Yenkwuso.Google Scholar
Barber, Elizabeth J. W.
1975Voice – Beyond the passive. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1. 16–24.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
1979Form and function: Passives, middles, and impersonals in Modern Hebrew. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society 5. 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languagees of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea S.
2004Reflexive-middle and reciprocal middle continua in Romanian. In Ilana Mushin (ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Chen, Weirong & Foong Ha Yap
Forthcoming. Pathways to adversity and speaker-affectedness: On the emergence of unaccusative ‘give’ constructions in Chinese. Linguistics.
[ p. 465 ]
Davidse, Kristin & Liesbet Heyvaert
2007On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1). 37–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1991A new approach to English grammar on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard
1977Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
1985On the middle construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas
2006The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2: Types of grammatical markers, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Farrell Ackerman
2001The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4). 798–814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990Grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2000Polysemy involving reflexive and reciprocal markers in African languages. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Tracy S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions (Typological Studies in Language 40), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilders, John H. & Jeremy C. D. Lawrance
1956An introduction to the Ateso language. Kampala: Eagle Press.Google Scholar
Hŏ, Ung
1975Uri yet malbon: 15-segi kugŏ hyŏngt’aeron [The basis of Old Korean: 15th century Korean morphology]. Seoul: Saem Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Hong, Jongseon
1998Kuntaykwukeuy ihay [Understanding of Early Modern Korean]. Seoul: Pagijong Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003[1993]Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Eon-hak
2002Study on the grammaticalization of the ‘-go isda’ construction. The Chin-tan Hakpo [The Chin-tan Scholarly Journal] 94. 167–203.Google Scholar
2006Sangilonkwa pocoyongenuy yeksacek yenkwu [Historical studies on aspect and auxiliary verbs]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 466 ]
Keenan, Edward L. & Leonard M. Faltz
1985Boolean semantics for natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J. & Thomas Roeper
1984On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 381–416.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha Gyun
1980The meaning of causatives and passives in Korean. Hangeul 168. 3–47.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae Min
2014A typological study of anticausative, middle and medio-passive constructions. Studies in Modern Grammar 81. 65–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knott, Judith
1995The causative-passive correlation. In David C. Bennett, Theodora Bynon & George B. Hewitt (eds.), Subject, voice, and ergativity: Selected essays, 53–59. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Ko, Yŏng-jin
1997Hankwukeuymwunpephwakwaceng: Phwulissiuykyengwu [Grammaticalization of Korean: In the case of predicates]. Seoul: Kookhak.Google Scholar
Köhler, Oswin
1981Les langues Khoisan, section 1: Passive corre’ensemble. In Jean Perrot (ed.), Les langues dans le mon e ancien et o erne, pre issive correlation. In David’afrique su saharienne, 455–482. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Claire Moyse-Faurie
2010Towards a typology of reflexivity. Lecture notes at the DGfS-CNRS Summer School on Linguistic Typology (4), Leipzig 15 August – 3 September.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2010aThe progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 72). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bGrammaticalization, subjectification and objectification. In Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (Studies in Language Companion Series 119), 101–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Iksoo
2012Viewpoints in the Korean verbal complex: Evidence, perception, assessment, and time. Berkeley: University of California doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo-Sang
1991Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Los Angeles: University of California doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Tag
2001On the historical development of -ti-. Journal of Korean Linguistics 38. 117–134.Google Scholar
Lin, Huei-Ling
2011Pure unaccusatives with HOOI in Taiwan Southern Min. Lingua 121. 2035–2047. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marelj, Marijana
2004Middles and argument structure across languages. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, Huiling Xu & Virginia Yip
2005Passive and unaccusative in the Jieyang dialect of Chaozhou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(4). 267–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Su-Kyong
2011An essay on the meanings of ‘-eojida’: A typological perspective. The Society for Korean Language and Literary Research 151. 175–202.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2012Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek van de Velde (eds.), Intersections of intersubjectivity (Special issue of English Text Construction 5(1)), 29–52.Google Scholar
[ p. 467 ]
Nedjalkov, Igor
1993Causative-passive polysemy of the Manchu-Tungusic -bu/-v(u) . Linguistica Antverpiensa 27. 193–202.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej J. Jaxontov
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In, Vladimir P. Nedjakov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 4–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
1979Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1983Semantic explanations for the syntax of the English modals. In Frank Henry & Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistics categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. 2: The scope, order and distribution of English auxiliary verbs, 205–217. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Seong Jong
1984(A) study on Korean passive. Seoul: Seoul National University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Park, Jae-Yeon
2007On the modal meanings of auxiliary construction ‘-eoji-’. Kwukehak 50 [Korean Linguistics 50]. 269–293.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2014Grammaticalization of causatives and passives and their recent development into stance markers in Korean. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(3). 309–337.Google Scholar
Seng, Kwangswu
1976Kwuke kancepphitongey tayhaye [About indirect passive in Korean]. Mwunpepyenkwu 3 [Studies on Grammar 3]. 159–182.Google Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Roger Andersen
1995The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71. 743–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim & Benjamin Lyngfelt
2006Perspectives on demotion: Introduction to the volume. In Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds.), Demoting the agent: Passive, middle and other voice phenomena (Linguistik Aktuell 96 [Linguistics Today 96]), 1–20 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Son, Se-Mo-Dol
1995‘Tita’wa ‘cita’uy uymikochal [Considerations on the meanings of ‘tita’ and ‘cita’]. Hanyangemwun Yenkwu 13 [Hanyang Language and Culture Studies 13]. 997–1018.Google Scholar
1996(A) study of the Korean auxiliary verbs. Seoul: Hankookmunwhasa.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996Causatives and causation: A universal typological perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65. 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002From etymology to historical pragmatics. In Donka Minkova & Robert Stockwell (eds.), Studying the history of the English language: Millennial perspectives, 19–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 468 ]
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristine Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König
1991The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Washio, Ryuichi
1993When causatives mean passive: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2. 45–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woo, Inhyey
1997Wulimalphitongyenkwu [Studies on Korean Passives]. Seoul: Hankwukmwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
2017Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle, and passive uses of suffix -i . Manuscript: School of Humanities and Social Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Shoichi Iwasaki
2003From causative to passive: A passage in some East and Southeast Asian languages. In Eugene Casad & Gary Palmer (eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (Cognitive Linguistics Research 18), 419–446. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeon, Jae-Hoon
1994Grammatical relation changing constructions in Korean: A functional- typological study. London: University of London doctoral dissertation.[ p. 469 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2021. On the relationship between middles and passives. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:2  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Dom, Sebastian, Leonid Kulikov & Koen Bostoen
2018. Valency-decreasing derivations and quasi-middles in Bantu: A typological perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 36:3  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Halm, Tamás
2020. Grammaticalization without Feature Economy. Diachronica 37:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Shinzato, Rumiko
2020. Passives as unmarked voice: a case of “warning” Passives in Okinawan. Language Sciences 80  pp. 101276 ff. Crossref logo
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
2019. Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle and passive uses of suffix -i. Lingua 219  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.