Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 17:1 (2000) ► pp. 165174
References
Dogil, Grzegorz & Hans Christian Luschützky
1990 “Notes on Sonority and Segmental Strength.” Rivista di Linguistica 21.3–54.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia Jane
1985On the Natural Phonology of Vowels.(= Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics .) New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Drachman, Gaberell
1977 “On the Notion ‘Phonological Hierarchy’.” Phonologica 1976. Akten der dritten Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung , Wien , 1.-4. September 1976 ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler & Oskar E. Pfeiffer, 85–102. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Band 191.
Griffen, Toby D.
1985Aspects of Dynamic Phonology. (= Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series 4, 371.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund
1978Explorations in Abstract Phonology. Lublin: Uniwersytet M. Curie-Skłodowskiej.Google Scholar
1980Studies in Abstract Phonology. (= Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 41.) Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, Byron
1955Zur Phonologie der Wiener Mundart. (= Beiträge zur Deutschen Philologie , 61). Gießen: W. Schmitz.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi
1975 “Gibt es eine universelle Nasalierungsregel?Phonologica 1972. Akten der zweiten Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung , Wien , 5.-8. September 1972 ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler & Frantiček V. Mareš, 209–218. München & Salzburg, Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Poerck, Guy de
1962 “Le a tonique devant nasale dans les parlers rhéto-romanes.” Vox Romanica 211.57–82.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy
1977 “Nasalization in Polish.” Journal of Phonetics 51.17–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1988 “Latin.” The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 26–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar