Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 17:2 (2000) ► pp.451458
References
Joseph, Brian D.
1979 “Lachmann’s Law once again”. Linguistic Inquiry 101.363–365.Google Scholar
1980 “Watkins’ Law and the Modern Greek Preterite”. Die Sprache 261.179–184.Google Scholar
1986 “On the Value of Inverted Reconstruction in the Classical Languages – the Latin Contribution to the órkhis Question”, paper presented at Panel on Classical Linguistics, 82nd Annual Meeting of the Classical Association of the Middle West and South (CAMWS), Tampa, FL (4/1786).
Joseph, Brian D. & Pappas Panayiotis
2000 “The Modern Greek Future: An Exercise in Forward Reconstruction”, paper presented at 8th Spring Workshop on Linguistic Reconstruction, University of Pittsburgh (4/1/00).
Sihler, Andrew
Watkins, Calvert W.
1962Indo-European Origins of the Celtic Verb I. The sigmatic aorist. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
1968 “A Further Remark on Lachmann’s Law”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 741.55–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1969Indogermanische Grammatik,herausgegeben von Jerzy Kuryłowicz. Band III: Formenlehre. Erster Teil: Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
1970 “Studies in Indo-European legal language, institutions, and mythology”. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans ed. by George Cardona, Henry Hoenigswald & Alfred Senn, 321–354. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976 “La famille indo-européenne de grec οO ρχιV: linguistique, poétique, et mythologie. Bulletin de la Société linguistique de Paris 70.1.11–26.Google Scholar
1995How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European poetics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar