Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:2 (2018) ► pp.238–276
Articles / Aufsätze

When grammaticalization does not occur

Prosody-syntax mismatches in Indo-Aryan

| Universität zu Köln | ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian National University
| Universität zu Köln
Recent decades have seen a surge of interest in grammaticalization. In this paper, however, we are not concerned with reaching a better understanding of the nature of grammaticalization phenomena or their triggering factors, but we ask under what circumstances grammaticalization does not take place, even if it would have seemed likely to – a topic that has scarcely been addressed in the literature. Based on a comparative investigation of the historical development of a class of Indo-European spatial adverbs, we argue that mismatches between layers of linguistic structure present one type of situation in which grammaticalization may be blocked. For grammaticalization to occur, the outer semantic-syntactic boundaries of the potentially grammaticalizing construction must be matched by prosodic boundaries. If prosodic chunking is shifted in relation to semantic-syntactic chunking, grammaticalization may be prevented.
Keywords: grammaticalization, prosodic phrasing, Indo-Aryan, Indo-European, local particles, adverbs, adpositions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The importance of being a single processing unit
  • 3.Local particles in Indo-Aryan
    • 3.1Local particles and adpositions
    • 3.2The history of the local particles in Indo-Aryan
      • 3.2.1Rigveda
      • 3.2.2Vedic prose
      • 3.2.3Classical Sanskrit and Pali
      • 3.2.4New Indo-Aryan
    • 3.3Local particles in other Indo-European branches
  • 4.Prosody and the non-grammaticalization of the local particles
    • 4.1Vedic Sanskrit prosody
    • 4.2Prosody-syntax mismatches
    • 4.3The non-grammaticalization of the Old Indo-Aryan local particles
  • 5.How prosodic chunking may prevent (further) grammaticalization
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations in glosses
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17013.rei
References (59)
References
Amano, Kyoko. 2009. Maitrāyaṇī Saṃhitā I–II. Übersetzung der Prosapartien mit Kommentar zur Lexik und Syntax der älteren vedischen Prosa. Berlin: Hempen.Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip. 1979. Typology and the Indo-European prepositions. Indogermanische Forschungen 841. 49–61.Google Scholar
Bichlmeier, Harald. 2011. Ablativ, Lokativ und Instrumental im Jungavestischen. Ein Beitrag zur altiranischen Kasussyntax. Hamburg: Baar-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2011. Grammaticalization and linguistic typology. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization, 105–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline. 1989. The sentence particles and the place words in Old and Middle Hittite. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Bortone, Pietro. 2010. Greek prepositions from antiquity to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brosch, Cyril. 2014. Untersuchungen zur hethitischen Raumgrammatik. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casaretto, Antje. 2011. Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des Ṛgveda. IX1: ánu. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 651. 7–64.Google Scholar
. 2012 [2011]. Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des Ṛgveda. XII1: ví. Historische Sprachforschung 1241. 134–177. Citations refer to the 2011 edition.Google Scholar
. 2012. Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des Ṛgveda. XXI1: purás, purástāt und purā́. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 661. 11–53.Google Scholar
. 2017. Encoding non-spatial relations: Vedic local particles and the conceptual transfer from space to time. In Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Adam Hyllested, Anders Richardt Jørgensen, Guus Kroonen, Jenny Helena Larsson, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Tobias Mosbæk Søborg (eds.), Usque ad Radices: Indo-European studies in honour of Brigit Anette Olsen, 87–98. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Casaretto, Antje & Carolin Schneider. 2015. Vedic local particles at the syntax-semantics interface. In Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, 223–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2017. The relationship between etymology and semantics of local particles in the Rigveda. In Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds.), Etymology and the European lexicon Proceedings of the 14th Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17–22 September 2012, Copenhagen. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 105–118.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Silvia Luraghi. 2014. The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cuny, Albert. 1907. Les préverbes dans le Çatapathabrāhmaṇa. Paris: University of Paris dissertation.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Bertold. 1878. Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem Çatapathabrāhmaṇa. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George E. 1992. Die Grammatik der Partikeln. In Robert Beekes, Alexander Lubotsky & Jos Weitenberg (eds.), Rekonstruktion und relative Chronologie. Akten der VIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Leiden, 31. August – 4. September 1987. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 153–177.Google Scholar
2014. Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Band 11: Einleitung, Terminologie, Lautgesetze, Adverbialendungen, Nominalsuffixe, Anhänge und Indices. Band 21: Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahs, Achim. 1989. Grammatik des Pali. Leipzig: VEB Verlag.Google Scholar
Fritz, Matthias A. 2005. Die trikasuellen Lokalpartikeln bei Homer: Syntax und Semantik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The gradual coalescence into ‘words’ in grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 342–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich. 1988. Untersuchungen zur Hypotaxe im Vedischen. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. I1: ádhi. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 521. 27–76.Google Scholar
. 2002. Das Projekt einer Kasussyntax des Ṛgveda: Der Instrumental. In Heinrich Hettrich & Jeong-Soo Kim (eds.), Indogermanische Syntax – Fragen und Perspektiven, 43–63. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
. 2007. Materialien zu einer Kasussyntax des R̥gveda. Würzburg: Universität zu Würzburg, Institut für Altertumswissenschaften. [URL] (10 January, 2018.)
. 2014. Some remarks on the adverbal genitive. In Jared S. Klein & Elizabeth Tucker (eds.), Vedic and Sanskrit historical linguistics, 129–152. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich, Antje Casaretto & Carolin Schneider. 2010 [2004]. Syntax und Wortarten der Lokalpartikeln des R̥gveda. IV1: Allgemeines (H. Hettrich); II1. úpa (A. Casaretto); III1. áva (C. Schneider). Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 641, 17–130. Citations refer to the 2004 edition.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik (eds.). 2006. From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2005. Gram, construction, and class formation. In Clemens Knobloch & Burkhard Schaeder (eds.), Wortarten und Grammatikalisierung: Perspektiven in System und Erwerb, 79–93. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4). 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Beatrice Primus. 2015. Prominence beyond prosody: A first approximation. In Amedeo De Domenicis (ed.) pS-prominenceS: Prominences in Linguistics. Proceedings of the International Conference, 38–58. Viterbo: Discuom Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 1981. Space and time in Homer: Prepositional and adverbial particles in the Greek epic. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton. 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India. Translated by Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1953. Old Persian: Grammar, texts, lexicon. 2nd edn. New Haven, CO: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared S. 1992. On verbal accentuation in the Rigveda. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Probert, Philomen. 2006. Ancient Greek accentuation: Synchronic patterns, frequency effects, and prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichelt, Hans. 1978. Awestisches Elementarbuch. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta. 2016a. Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In preparation. Continuous and discontinuous nominal expressions in “free word order” languages: Patterns and correlates.
Schiering, René. 2006. Cliticization and the evolution of morphology: A cross-linguistic study on phonology in grammaticalization. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz dissertation.Google Scholar
Starke, Frank. 1977. Die Funktionen der dimensionalen Kasus und Adverbien im Althethitischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Tjerkstra, Françoise A. 1999. Principles of the relation between local adverb, verb and sentence particle in Hittite. Groningen: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1877. Der griechische Verbalaccent. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 231. 457–470.Google Scholar
West, Martin L. 2010. The hymns of Zoroaster: A new translation of the most ancient texts of Iran. New York: Tauris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1869–1870. On the nature and designation of the accent in Sanskrit. Transactions of the American Philological Association 11. 20–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983 [1879]. Sanskrit grammar. 5th edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2011. Grammaticalization and prosody. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 332–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Biagetti, Erica
2024. Early Vedic compounds. Studies in Language 48:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Reinöhl, Uta & T. Mark Ellison
2024. Metaphor forces argument overtness. Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo
Nikitina, Tatiana, Ekaterina Aplonova & Leonardo Contreras Roa
2023. Chapter 4. The use of interjections as a discourse phenomenon. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2022. Prosodic phrasing and the emergence of phrase structure. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 715 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.