Article published in:
Vol. 36:1 (2019) ► pp. 6699
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Ingo Plag
(eds.) 2015Special issue: Semantics of derivational morphology. Morphology 25(4). 349–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Rochelle Lieber
1991Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5). 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag
2013The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert
1995Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Coetsem, Frans van
1995Outlining a model of the transmission phenomenon in language contact. Leuvense Bijdragen 841. 63–85.Google Scholar
Dictionnaire du Moyen Français
Douglas, David
(ed.) 1975English historical documents, vol 31. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek
1970The semantics of English loanwords in Polish. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21. 41–49.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
Forthcoming. Morphology and contact-induced language change. In Anthony Grant ed. The Oxford handbook of language contact Oxford Oxford University Press
Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze
2015Borrowed morphology: An overview. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 1–23. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gramley, Stephan
2012The history of English: An introduction. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011Typological changes in the lexicon. Analytic tendencies in English noun formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2003Causes and consequences of word structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2018Medieval bilingualism in England: On the rarity of vernacular code-switching. In Päivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 319–337. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea & Ingo Plag
2015Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of -ment suffixation. In Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 289–319. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
2003Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 217–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
2004Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Semantics of derivational morphology. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, 2098–2119. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2007The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
2007Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://​www​.oed​.com (12 Dec 2013.)
Plag, Ingo
1999Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Productivity. In Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 537–556. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette
2007Types of loan: matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schröder, Anne
2011On the productivity of verbal prefixation in English: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Schulte, Marion
2015aThe semantics of derivational morphology: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the suffixes -age and -ery in English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2015bPolysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation – A case study of the English suffixes -age and -ery . Morphology 25(4). 371–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Language contact in the history of English. In Marcus Hartner & Marion Schulte (eds.), Migration in context: literature, culture and language, 21–36. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar
2017Investigating semantic change in derivational morphology. In Elise Louviot & Catherine Delesse (eds.), Studies in language variation and change 2: Shifts and turns in the history of English, 41–60. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2013AfBo: A world-wide survey of affix borrowing. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​afbo​.info (11 July 2018.)
2015Direct and indirect affix borrowing. Language 91(3). 511–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2008Language contact. Constraints and common paths of contact-induced language change. In Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages, 3–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola
2009Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. The development of -hood, dom, and -ship in the history of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uth, Melanie
2011Französische Ereignisnominalisierungen. Abstrakte Bedeutung und regelhafte Wortbildung. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka
(eds.) 2012Morphologies in contact. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald
2003An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan
2009A typology of verbal borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Laura
2018A multilingual approach to the history of Standard English. In Päivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 339–358. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar