Review published In:
DiachronicaVol. 18:1 (2001) ► pp.171–180
Book review
. Lexical phonology and the history of English April McMahon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 309 pp.
Reviewed by
References (13)
Agutter, Alex
1988a “The dangers of dialect parochialism: The Scottish Vowel Length Rule”. Historical Dialectology ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1988b “The not-so-Scottish Vowel Length Rule”. Edinburgh Studies in the English Language ed. by John M. Anderson & Norman Macleod, 120–132. Edinburgh: John Donald.
Anderson, Stephen A.
1992 Amorphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Booij, Geert & Rubach Jerzy
1987 “Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology”. Linguistic Inquiry 181.1–44.
Chomsky, Noam & Halle Morris
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Halle, Morris & Mohanan K. P.
1985 “Segmental phonology of modern English”. Linguistic Inquiry 161.57–116.
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons Joseph C.
1995 “Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic”. Phonology 121.369–396.
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “How abstract is phonology?”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory ed. by O. Fujimura, 1–136. Tokyo: Taikusha.
1982 “Lexical phonology and morphology”. Linguistics in the Morning Calm ed. by I.-S. Yang, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Ladefoged, Peter
1990 “On dividing phonetics and phonology”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech ed. by J. Kingston & Mary Beckman, 398–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1993 A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lass, Roger & Anderson John M.
1975 Old English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steriade, Donca
1995 “Underspecification and markedness”. The Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. by John Goldsmith, 114–174. Oxford: Blackwell.