Cover not available
Short note published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:1 (2019) ► pp.100–120
Notes / Notizen — Discussion / Diskussion

Sampling error in lexicostatistical measurements

A Slavic case study

| Victoria University of Wellington
| Victoria University of Wellington
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Lexicostatistics and linguistic distances
  • 3.Measurement error and sampling error
  • 4.Quantifying sampling error with the McNemar test
  • 5.Case study: Is Upper Sorbian closer to Czech or to Polish?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18004.fel
References
Bakker, Dik, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai, Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Pamela Brown, Dmitry Egorov, Robert Mailhammer, Anthony Grant, & Eric W. Holman
2009 Adding typology to lexicostatistics: A combined approach to language classification. Linguistic Typology 13(1). 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, Paul
1976 Multidimensional scaling applied to linguistic relationships. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 31. 43–92.Google Scholar
Čejka, Mirek & Arnošt Lamprecht
1963 K otázce vzniku a diferenciace slovanských jazyků. Sborník prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské University, A, Řada jazykovědná 121, 5–20.Google Scholar
Čejka, Mirek
1972 Lexicostatistic dating and Slavonic languages. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské University, A, Řada jazykovědná 211. 39–52.Google Scholar
Dolgopol’sky, Aaron B.
1986 A probabilistic hypothesis concerning the oldest relationships among the language families of Northern Eurasia. In V. Shevoroshkin & T. L. Markey (eds.), Typology, relationship and time: A collection of papers on language change and relationship by Soviet linguists, 27–50. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael
2014 Language phylogenies. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 190–211. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore
1962 The lexicostatistical classification of the Malayopolynesian languages. Language, 38(1). 38–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyen, Isidore, Joseph B. Kruskal & Paul Black
1992 An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M.
1986 Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Fields, Edda L.
2004 Before “Baga”: Settlement chronologies of the coastal Rio Nunez region, earliest times to C.1000 CE. The International Journal of African Historical Studies 37(2). 229–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, István
1961 The validity of glottochronology on the basis of the Slavonic languages. Studia Slavica 7. 295–346. (Hungarianå version published as: A glottochronologia ervenyessege a szlav nyelvek anyaga alapjan. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 63(2). 308–344.)Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson
2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 4261. 435–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Charles E., & Barbara D. Grimes
1987 Languages of South Sulawesi. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australia National University.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, Sarah C.
1956 The ABC’S of lexicostatistics (Glottochronology). WORD, 12(2). 175–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggarty, Paul
2010 Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of “Word List” comparisons. Diachronica 27(2). 301–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller, & Dik Bakker
2008 Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica 42(3–4). 331–354.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett
2001 The significance of word lists. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett & Annukka Lehtonen
2006 Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. In Colin Renfew, Peter Forster (eds.), Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, 33–42. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L.
1958 Romance history and glottochronology. Language, 34(4). 454–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1953 The basis of glottochronology. Language, 29(2). 113–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levenshtein, Vladimir I.
1965 Dvoichnye kody s ispravleniem vypadenij, vstavok i zameshhenij simvolov. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 163(4), 845–848;Google Scholar
1966 Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10(8). 707–710.Google Scholar
Maguire, Warren & April McMahon, A.
2011 Quantifying relations between dialects. In Warren Maguire & April McMahon (eds.), Analysing variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mańczak, Witold
2009 The original homeland of the Slavs. Studia Mythologica Slavica 121. 135–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marris, Emma
2008 Language: The language barrier. Nature 453(7194). 446–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mchugh, Mary L.
2013 The Chi-square test of independence: Lessons in biostatistics. Biochemia Medica 23(2), 143–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April, & Robert McMahon
2005 Language classification by numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, David & Melanie Mead
1991 Survey of the Pamona dialects of Kecamatan Bungku Tengah. Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures 111. 121–142.Google Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe, & Tandy Warnow
2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81(2). 382–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, Geoff K., & Russell D. Gray
2006 Quantifying uncertainty in a stochastic model of vocabulary evolution. In Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of language, 161–171. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.Google Scholar
Novotná, Petra & Václav Blažek
2005 Glottochronologie a její aplikace pro slovanské jazyky. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské university, A, Řada jazykovědná 541. 51–80.Google Scholar
Olmsted, David
1957 Three tests of glottochronological theory. American Anthropologist 59(5). 839–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L.
1971 Towards the construction of a standard lexicostatistic list. Anthropological Linguistics 13(9). 421–434. Retrieved from [URL]
Pereltsvaig, Asya & Martin W. Lewis
2015 The Indo-European controversy: Facts and fallacies in historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serva, Maurizio & Filippo Petroni
2008 Indo-European languages tree by Levenshtein distance. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 81(6). 68005. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheskin, David J.
2003 Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall Crc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, Gary
1977 Tables of significance for lexicostatistics. In Richard Loving, Gary Simons (eds.), Language variation and survey techniques: Workpapers in Papua New Guinea languages 211. 75–106. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei A.
1992 Methodology of Long-Range Comparison. In Vitalii Shevoroshkin (ed.), Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind, 75–59. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2004 Data cited from Novotná and Blažek (2005), as described in the text on page 108.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1952 Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96(4). 452–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1955 Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistics dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21(2). 121–137. Retrieved from [URL]
Tadmor, Uri
2009 Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In Martin Haspelmath, Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, 55–75. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, Uri, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
2010 Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica 27(2). 226–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tischler, Johann
1973 Glottochronologie und Lexikostatistik. Innsbruck: Kowatch.Google Scholar
Yang, Zhao, Xuezheng Sun & James W. Hardin
2010 A note on the tests for clustered matched-pair binary data. Biometrical Journal 52(5). 638–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar