The principle of directionality is an important part of the comparative method: in order to arrive at a
reconstruction, historical linguists need a robust theory that informs them in what direction linguistic change is likely to
proceed. But any such theory will have exceptions. How are these to be spotted? I examine one case in which a counter-directional
change, degrammaticalization, can be reconstructed by invoking the phonotactics of the proto-language. The degrammaticalized form
is the Sirva 3sg pronoun be, and the proto-language is Proto-Sogeram. After making this reconstruction,
I also demonstrate that it can be used to enhance our understanding of degrammaticalization. Be spawned a small
family of related forms, which shows us that degrammaticalized forms can become polygrammaticalized in the same way as other
2013Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 169–240. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent
2011Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2001Phonology and language use. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris
2002Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing “Myths and the prehistory of grammars.” Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 599–618.
2016The Ngkolmpu language, with special reference to distributed exponence. Canberra: Australian National University Ph.D. dissertation.
2003aOn degrammaticalization. In Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001, 163–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2003bGrammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song
2011On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 587–630.
1976Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38(2). 89–108.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2013Construction Grammar: Introduction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language 19), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, Brian D.
2014What counts as (an instance of) grammaticalization?Folia Linguistica 48(2). 361–383.
1996Reconstruction in morphology. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 218–263. New York: Oxford University Press.
1992Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2002Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
Lightfoot, David W.
2002Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 113–136.
2011Degrammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 475–487. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1995C. L. Voorhoeve and the Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis. In Connie Baak, Mary Bakker & Dick van der Meij (eds.), Tales from a concave world: Liber amicorum Bert Voorhoeve, 83–123. Leiden: Leiden University.
1998The Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis: A reassessment. In Jelle Miedema, Cecilia Odé & Rien A. C. Dam (eds.), Perspectives on the Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia: Proceedings of the conference, Leiden, 13–17 October 1997, 655–690. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2005The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis: Recent research and its implications. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 67–107. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2012How reconstructible is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. In Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages. (Special issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia), 88–164.
Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström
2017The Trans New Guinea family. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2017Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis?Language 93(2). 381–413.
2000A preliminary subgrouping of the Madang languages based on pronouns. Unpublished ms, Australian National University.
2005Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
2015The argument indexing of Early Austronesian verbs: A reconstructional myth? In Dag T. T. Haug (ed.),
Historical linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics
, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013, 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1996Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 264–304. New York: Oxford University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.