Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:1 (2019) ► pp. 136
References
Ahern, Christopher & Robin Clark
2017Conflict, cheap talk, and Jespersen’s cycle. Semantics and Pragmatics 101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der
2002More thoughts on degrammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 19–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balles, Irene
2008Principles of syntactic reconstruction and “morphology as paleosyntax”: The case of some Indo-European secondary verbal formations. In Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302), 161–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2013Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 169–240. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent
2011Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001Phonology and language use. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris
2002Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing “Myths and the prehistory of grammars.” Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 599–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Matthew
2016The Ngkolmpu language, with special reference to distributed exponence. Canberra: Australian National University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette
1991Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization II. (Typological Studies in Language 19), vol. II1: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers, 455–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2001Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Joan Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. (Typological Studies in Language 45), 471–480. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Don
2015A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
2016Magɨ: An undocumented language of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 55(1). 199–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aGants is a Sogeram language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 351. 82–93.Google Scholar
2017bA method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language 41(3). 577–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Papuan Languages Collection. Archival collection, 960 items. Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures (PARADISEC). http://​catalog​.paradisec​.org​.au​/collections​/DD1
Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth
Forthcoming. Subgrouping the Sogeram languages: A critical appraisal of historical glottometry. Journal of Historical Linguistics.
Daniels, Don & Joseph D. Brooks
Forthcoming. The history of *=a: Contact and reconstruction in northeast New Guinea. Journal of Language Contact.
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
2009The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C.
2008Reconstruction in syntax: Reconstruction of patterns. In Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302), 73–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Kyle
n.d. Nend texts. Electronic files, Pioneer Bible Translators.
1990Nend grammar essentials. In John R. Roberts (ed.), Two grammatical studies (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 37), 73–156. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 371. 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003aOn degrammaticalization. In Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001, 163–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003bGrammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Frederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song
2011On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 587–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, Robert
1976Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38(2). 89–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2013Construction Grammar: Introduction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language 19), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2014What counts as (an instance of) grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica 48(2). 361–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Harold
1996Reconstruction in morphology. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 218–263. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don
1992Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W.
2002Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 113–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Bernard Comrie & Peter Sells
(eds.) 2017Noun-modifying clause constructions in languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries. (Typological Studies in Language 116.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mengden, Ferdinand von
2008Reconstructing complex structures: A typological perspective. In Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302), 97–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
(eds.) 2011The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevis, Joel A.
1986Decliticization and deaffixation in Saame: Abessive taga . In Brian D. Joseph (ed.), Studies on language change. (The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 34), 1–9.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Degrammaticalization: Three common controversies. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 123–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Degrammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 475–487. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew
1995C. L. Voorhoeve and the Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis. In Connie Baak, Mary Bakker & Dick van der Meij (eds.), Tales from a concave world: Liber amicorum Bert Voorhoeve, 83–123. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar
1998The Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis: A reassessment. In Jelle Miedema, Cecilia Odé & Rien A. C. Dam (eds.), Perspectives on the Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia: Proceedings of the conference, Leiden, 13–17 October 1997, 655–690. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2005The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis: Recent research and its implications. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 67–107. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2012How reconstructible is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. In Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages. (Special issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia), 88–164.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström
2017The Trans New Guinea family. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin
2011A Phula comparative lexicon: Phola, Phuza, Muji, Phowa, Azha. SIL International.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2017Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis? Language 93(2). 381–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
2000A preliminary subgrouping of the Madang languages based on pronouns. Unpublished ms, Australian National University.Google Scholar
2005Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2015The argument indexing of Early Austronesian verbs: A reconstructional myth? In Dag T. T. Haug (ed.), Historical linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Oslo, 5–9 August 2013, 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweeney, Mike
n.d. Mum texts. Electronic files, Pioneer Bible Translators.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2015On degrammaticalization: Controversial points and possible explanations. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 381–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Martha
1989A survey of the grammatical structures and semantic functions of the Apalɨ (Emerum) language. Ms, Pioneer Bible Translators.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2013The correspondence problem in syntactic reconstruction. Diachronica 30(1). 95–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
1996Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 264–304. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, David
2010Degrammaticalization and obsolescent morphology: Evidence from Slavonic. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2016Degrammaticalization in North Saami: Development of adpositions, adverbs and a free lexical noun from inflectional and derivational suffixes. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 401. 113–173.Google Scholar
Z’graggen, John A.
1971Classificatory and typological studies in languages of the Madang District (Pacific Linguistics C 19). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1975aThe Madang-Adelbert Range subphylum. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene. (Pacific Linguistics C 38), 569–612. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1975bThe languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea. (Pacific Linguistics B 41.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1980A comparative word list of the Southern Adelbert Range languages, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. (Pacific Linguistics D 33.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Daniels, Don
2020. The history of tense and aspect in the Sogeram family. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.