Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 36:3 (2019) ► pp. 337–383

Borrowing from an unrelated language in support of intragenetic tendencies

The case of the conditional clitic =sa in Udi

| Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences | HSE University, Russia
Udi is a Nakh-Daghestanian (Lezgic) language spoken in northern Azerbaijan, which has undergone many contact-induced changes due to the influence of unrelated languages of the eastern Caucasus (Indo-European, Turkic). A recent change is the borrowing of the conditional enclitic =sa from Azerbaijani (Turkic). In Udi, this marker can combine with finite indicative tenses, resulting in a series of derived ‘realis’ conditional mood forms. The clitic is also used to create an indefiniteness marker, which derives indefinite pronouns from interrogative ones. Prior to the borrowing of the Azerbaijani morpheme there was no comparable marker in Udi available to fulfil these functions, while other Lezgic languages employ their own native grammatical means for the same functions (conditional clitics or auxiliaries). The acquisition of the borrowed clitic has thus made Udi more and not less structurally isomorphic with respect to the other languages of the Lezgic branch. This paper develops a description of functions related to the domain of conditional mood on various stages of the history of Udi, and suggests a diachronic scenario for the borrowing of the Azerbaijani marker =sa.
Keywords: language contact, contact-induced change, clitic borrowing, matter borrowing, conditional mood, indefinite pronouns, Udi, Nakh-Daghestanian, Azerbaijani, Turkic
Published online: 17 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18019.mai
References

[ p. 377 ]References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002 Language contact in Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A crosslinguistic typology, 1–66. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alekseev, M. E.
1985 Voprosy sravnitel´no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov. Morfologija. Sintaksis [Problems of the comparative-historical reconstruction of the grammar of Lezgic languages: Morphology. Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Authier, Gilles
2009 Grammaire Kryz (Langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2010 Azeri morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian). Turkic Languages 14(1). 14–42.Google Scholar
Bağrıaçık, Metin, Angela Ralli & Dimitra Melissaropoulou
2015 Borrowing verbs from Oghuz Turkic: Two linguistic areas. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 109–136. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bežanov, S.
1902 Gospoda Našego Iisusa Xrista Svjatoe evangelie ot Matfeja, Marka, Luki i Ioanna na russkom i udinskom jazykax [The Holy Gospel according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John in Russian and Udi]. Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemen Kavkaza. XXX.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane
2006 Turkish elements in spoken Kurmanji. In Hendrik Boeschoten & Lars Johanson (eds.), Turkic languages in contact, 95–121. (Turcologica 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Clifton, John M., Deborah A. Clifton, Peter Kirk & Roar Ljøkjell
2005 The sociolinguistic situation of the Udi in Azerbaijan. In John M. Clifton (ed.), Studies in languages of Azerbaijan, vol. 1, 107–123. Baku: Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan & St. Petersburg, Russia: SIL International. Available online at https://​www​.sil​.org​/resources​/archives​/9063. Accessed 2019-08-12
Çejrani, Ţɵdɵr and Mixak Çejrani
1934 Samçi dəs. Suxum: Abgizen Ţərbi.Google Scholar
Dirr, A[dolf]. M.
1903 Grammatika udinskogo jazyka [Udi grammar]. Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemen Kavkaza. XXXIII.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf
1928 Udische Texte. Caucasica 5. 60–72.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, Nina
2017 Contact-induced usages of volitional moods in East Caucasian languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(5). 559–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorleijn, Margreet
2006 Turkish-Kurdish language contact. In Hendrik Boeschoten & Lars Johanson (eds.), Turkic languages in contact, 74–94. (Turcologica 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gajdarov, R. I., A. G. Gjul´magomedov, U. A. Mejlanova, & B. B. Talibov
2009 Sovremennyj lezginskij jazyk [Modern Lezgian]. Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Gandon, Ophélie
2015 Convergence areas in the Caucasus-Western Iran area with respect to relativization strategies. In Actes des 18èmes Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs de l’ED 268: Contact de langues: Situations, représentations, réalisations. Paris, France. Available online at https://​halshs​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/halshs​-01197191. Accessed 2019-08-12
[ p. 378 ]
2016 La relativisation dans une perspective aréale: L’aire Caucase – Anatolie de l’Est – Iran de l’Ouest. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris Sorbonne – Paris 3.Google Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry & Timur Maisak
2019 Nakh-Daghestanian languages: A family survey. In Maria Polinsky (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the languages of the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera
2012 What is ‘contact-induced grammaticalization’? Examples from Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages. In Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli & Björn Hansen (eds.), Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact, 381–426. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gippert, Jost
2011 Relative clauses in Vartashen Udi: Preliminary remarks. Iran and the Caucasus 15. 207–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Wolfgang Schulze, Zaza Aleksidze & Jean-Pierre Mahé
2008 The Caucasian Albanian palimpsests of Mount Sinai. Edition and interpretation. 2 vols. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake
2005 Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1990[1969] Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Jaan Puhvel (ed.), Substance and structure of language, 147–203. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Reprinted in Keith Denning, Suzanne Kemmer (eds.) 1990 On Language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 71–118. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.)Google Scholar
Gukasjan, V. L.
1973 Vzaimootnošenija azerbajdžanskogo i udinskogo jazykov [Relations between the Azerbaijani and Udi languages]. Avtoreferat diss. dokt. filol. nauk. Baku: Elm.Google Scholar
1974 Udinsko-azerbajdžansko-russkij slovarʹ [Udi-Azerbaijani-Russian dictionary]. Baku: Elm.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey
2001 Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: From top to bottom. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 195–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Turkish influence on Kurmanjî Kurdish: Evidence from the Tunceli dialect. In Lars Johanson & Christiane Bulut (eds.), Turkic-Iranian contact areas. Historical and linguistic aspects, 283–299. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C.
2000 Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76. 593–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Endoclitics and the origins of Udi morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2011 Indefinite pronouns. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 46. Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/46. Accessed 2019-08-12
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 379 ]
2005 Language contact and grammatical change. (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Contact and grammaticalization. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Handbook of language contact, 86–105. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1999 The dynamics of code-copying in language encounters. In Bernt Brendemoen, Elizabeth Lanza & Else Ryen (eds.), Language encounters across time and space: Studies in language contact, 37–62. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2002 Contact-induced linguistic change in a code-copying framework. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 285–313. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 On the roles of Turkic in the Caucasus area. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective, 160–181. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kassian, Alexei
2015 Towards a formal genealogical classification of the Lezgian languages (North Caucasus): Testing various phylogenetic methods on lexical data. PLoS ONE 10(2). Available online at http://​journals​.plos​.org​/plosone​/article​?id​=10​.1371​/journal​.pone​.0116950. Accessed 2019-08-12. Crossref
Kibrik, A. E.
1977 Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka. T. 2. Taksonomičeskaja grammatika [A structural description of the Archi language. V. 2. Taxonomic grammar]. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexandr E.
1998 Does intragenetic typology make sense? In Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl H. Wagner, & Wolfgang Wildgen (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit: In memoriam Johannes Bechert, Bd. 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, 61–68. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. E., S. V. Kodzasov, I. P. Olovjannikova & D. S. Samedov
1977 Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka. Teksty i slovari [A structural description of the Archi language. Texts and dictionaries]. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. E. & J. G. Testelec
(eds.) 1999 Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Aspects of the Tsakhur language from a typological perspective]. Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1997 Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kurbanov, K. K.
2001 Grammatičeskij očerk tabasaranskogo jazyka. In B. G.-K. Xanmagomedov & K. T. Šalbuzov. Tabasaransko-russkij slovar´ [Tabasaran-Russian dictionary], 395–476. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Lander, Ju. A.
2014 Pokazatel´ ki v udinskom jazyke: problema dlja lokusa markirovanija i sintaksičeskoj struktury [The marker ki in Udi: A problem for the locus of marking and syntactic structure]. In M. A. Danièl´, E. A. Ljutikova, V. A. Plungjan, S. G. Tatevosov & O. V. Fedorova (eds.). Jazyk. Konstanty. Peremennye. Pamjati Aleksandra Evgen´jeviča Kibrika [Language. Constants. Variables: In memory of A.E. Kibrik], 485–498. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L.
1967 Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 380 ]
Maisak [Majsak], Timur A.
2008 Varianty udinskoj orfografii i transkripcii (kratkij obzor) [Variants of Udi orthography and transcription: An overview]. In M. E. Alekseev, T. A. Majsak, D. S. Ganenkov & Yu. A. Lander (eds.), Udinskij sbornik: Grammatika, leksika, istorija jazyka [The Udi collection: Grammar, lexicon, language history], 443–460. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Maisak, Тimur
2011 The present and the future within the Lezgic tense and aspect systems. In Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds.), Tense, aspect, modality and finiteness in East Caucasian languages, 25–66. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Grammaticalization in Lezgic languages. In Andrej Malchukov & Walter Bisang eds. Comparative handbook of grammaticalization scenarios. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Menges, Karl H.
1995 The Turkic languages and peoples: An introduction to Turkic studies. 2nd, revised edn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Merdanova, S. R.
2004 Morfologija i grammatičeskaja semantika agul´skogo jazyka: Na materiale xpjukskogo govora [Morphology and grammatical semantics of Agul: Data from the Huppuq’ dialect]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel´.Google Scholar
Nikolayev, Sergei L. & Sergei A. Starostin
1994 A North Caucasian etymological dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk.Google Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2009 Intensive contact and the copying of paradigms – an Ėven dialect in contact with Sakha (Yakut). Journal of Language Contact, VARIA 2. 85–110.Google Scholar
2015 A comparison of copied morphemes in Sakha (Yakut) and Ėven. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 157–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pančviʒe [Panchvidze], V. N.
1974 Udiuri enis gramat’ik’uli analizi [Grammatical analysis of the Udi language]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Perepis′
1989 Vsesojuznaja perepisˊ naselenija 1989 g. Raspredelenie naselenija Azepbajdžanskoj SSR po naibolee mnogočislennym nacionalˊnostjam i jazyku [The 1989 Soviet census: Distribution of the Azerbaijan SSR population by the largest ethnicities and language]. Available online at http://​www​.demoscope​.ru​/weekly​/ssp​/sng​_nac​_lan​_89​_az​.php. Accessed 2019-08-12
Perepis′
2010 Vserossijskaja perepisˊ naselenija 2010 g. Nacionalˊnyj sostav naselenija Rossijskoj Federacii [The 2010 Russian census: Ethnic composition of the Russian Federation]. Available online at http://​www​.demoscope​.ru​/weekly​/ssp​/rus​_nac​_10​.php. Accessed 2019-08-12
Podlesskaya, Vera I.
2001 Conditional constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Vol 2, 998–1010. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette
2007 Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schiefner, Anton A.
1863 Versuch über die Sprache der Uden. (Aus den Mémoires de l’Acad. impériale des sciences de St. Pétersb., 7. Ser., tome VI, No 8.) St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
1982 Die Sprache der Uden in Nordazerbajdžan. Studien zur Synchronie und Diachronie einer süd-ostkaukasischen Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2001a The Udi Gospels: Annotated text, etymological index, lemmatized concordance. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
[ p. 381 ]
2001b The Udi Language: A grammatical description with sample text Available online at http://​wschulze​.userweb​.mwn​.de​/Udigen1​.htm. Accessed 2019-08-12
2002 The loan layers of Udi: Armenian. In Wolfram Bublitz, Manfred von Roncador & Heinz Vater (eds.), Philology, typology and language structure. Festschrift for Winfried Boeder on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 211–223. Frankfurt a.M: Lang.Google Scholar
2005 Towards a history of Udi. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics 1. 55–91.Google Scholar
2012 Vier neuere udische Texte, Teil 2. Georgica 34. 8–29.Google Scholar
2015a From Caucasian Albanian to Udi. Iran and the Caucasus 19. 149–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b Aspects of Udi-Iranian language contact. In Uwe Bläsing, Victoria Arakelova & Matthias Weinreich (eds.), Studies on Iran and the Caucasus. In honour of Garnik Asatrian, 373–401. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016a How much Udi is Udi? In Ramazan Korkmaz & Gürkan Doğan (eds.), Endangered languages of the Caucasus and beyond, 187–208. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b Udi. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, 3564–3578. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016c Textual Resources for Udi. In Reineck, Natia & Ute Rieger (eds.), Kaukasiologie heute – Festschrift für Heinz Fähnrich zum 70. Geburtstag, 361–381. Jena: Buchverlag König.Google Scholar
Schulze-Fürhoff, Wolfgang
1994 Udi. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus. Vol. 3. North East Caucasian languages. Part 2, 447–514. Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon
2011 Comparative constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 121. Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/121. Accessed 2019-08-12
Statistical Committee
2009 Distribution of population by native language and freely command of languages (based on 2009 population census). The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Population by ethnic groups, by native language and freely command of languages. Available online at https://​www​.stat​.gov​.az​/source​/demoqraphy​/en​/001​_11​-12en​.xls. Accessed 2019-08-12
Stilo, Donald L.
2008 Two sets of mobile verbal person agreement markers in the Northern Talyshi language. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Donald Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 363–390. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2015 An introduction to the Atlas of the Araxes-Iran Linguistic Area. In Bernard Comrie & Lucía Golluscio (eds.), Language contact and documentation. Contacto lingüístico y documentación, 343–355. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2018 Numeral classifier systems in the Araxes-Iran linguistic area. In William B. McGregor & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The diachrony of classification systems, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
2015 Adjective-noun agreement in language contact: Loss, realignment and innovation. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 269–301. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
[ p. 382 ]
Širaliev, M. Š. & E. V. Sevortjan
(eds.) 1971 Grammatika azerbajdžanskogo jazyka [A grammar of Azerbaijani]. Baku: Elm.Google Scholar
Talibov, B. B.
2007 Buduxskij jazyk [Budugh]. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Todd, Terry Lynn
2008 A grammar of Dimili also known as Zaza. 2nd ed. Electronic publication. Available online at http://​www​.zazaki​.de​/english​/T​.L​.Todd​-AGrammarofDimli​.pdf. Accessed 2019-08-12
van den Berg, Helma
2005 The East Caucasian language family. Lingua, 115. 147–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xanmagomedov, B. G.-K.
1970 Očerki po sintaksisu tabasaranskogo jazyka [Studies in Tabasaran syntax]. Makhachkala: Dagučpedgiz.Google Scholar
Ǯeiranišvili [Dzheiranishvili], E. F.
1971 Udiuri ena. Gramat’ik’a, krestomat’ia, leksik’oni [Udi: grammar, texts, lexicon]. Tbilisi: Tbilisi univ. gamomcemloba.Google Scholar

Published sources in Nizh Udi

Ant’onova, V.
2010 Nanay muz-2. Bəkü.Google Scholar
2012 Udi muz-3. Bəkü.Google Scholar
2015 Udi muz-4. Bakı.Google Scholar
Aydınov, Y. A. & J. A. Keçaari
1996a Əlifba (TIetıir). Bəkü.Google Scholar
1996b Udin muz (udi dili) 3. Bakı.Google Scholar
Dabakov, V.
2013 Nanaj muz (Rodnoj jazyk). Šaxty.Google Scholar
Dabakov, V. V.
2007 Udiğoy folklor: Nağılxo. Legendoox. Astrakhan.Google Scholar
Keçaari [Kečaari], Ž.
1996 Nana očal: Šeirxo, hekjətxo, drama. Baku.Google Scholar
Keçaari, Ҝ.
2001 Orayin. Bakı.Google Scholar
2003 Buruxmux. Gәncә.Google Scholar
Luke
2011 = Luk’an exlətbi Mŭq Xavar. Bakı.Google Scholar
Ruth-Iona
2009 = Rut’, İona. Chambersburg.Google Scholar
[ p. 383 ]