Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:1 (2020) ► pp. 83126
References

References

Anderson, Curt
2013Inherent and coerced gradability across categories: Manipulating pragmatic halos with sorta. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference 23, 81–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto
2010Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics 48(4). 919–950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Valgerður Bjarnadóttir, Serena Danesi, Tonya Kim Dewey, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Chiara Fedriani & Thomas Smitherman
2013The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of European Studies 41(3). 321–377.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
1997On the semantics of the comparative conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy. 20(3). 229–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice Julie
2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2008Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6. 113–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walden
2015On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 363–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G.
1983Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. In Doris Schönefeld (ed.), Constructions all over: Case studies and theoretical implications, special issue of Constructions. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change. Harlow, Essex: Longman, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
2005Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014Does innovation need reanalysis? In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 23–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28(1). 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel van Goethem
2018The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2). 197–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions SV1-9.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova
2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2008Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann and Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–33. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
2016Constructional change vs. grammaticalization: From compounding to derivation. Studies in Language 40(1). 137–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2008Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 133–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In Evie Coussé, Joel Olofsson & Peter Andersson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 22–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2014Comparing English comparative correlatives. Postdoctoral dissertation, Osnabrück University.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
(eds.) 2013The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij
2014From compounding to derivation: The rise of derivational affixes through constructionalization. In Ferdinand von Mengden & Horst Simon (eds.), Refining grammaticalization. Special issue of Folia Linguistica 48(2). 579–604.Google Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Li, Xiao & Carlos A. Fasola
2010The semantics of yue…yue in Mandarin Chinese. In Lauren Eby Clemens & Chi-Ming Louis Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL 20), 36–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang
2007On the semantics of comparative correlatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Semantics 24(2). 169–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Shizhen & Yunxia Ji
2007A tentative analysis of the origin of Middle Chinese grammar and its historical position. Macrolinguistics 1. 141–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, Guofu
2013 [Yuelaiyue…] goushi de yufahua [The grammaticalization of the [yuelaiyue …] construction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 1. 25–33.Google Scholar
, Shuxiang
1980 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [The eight hundred words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
1985 Jindai Hanyu zhidaici [Demonstratives and pronouns in Early Mandarin]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1988The comparative conditional construction in English, German and Chinese. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 176–187. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2001Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 47–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2015Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2014Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019The dynamic of assemblies and constructions. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept, 155–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain
1996Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. J. Huang & Audrey Li Yen Hui (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
1988Variation and historical linguistics. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 89(2). 136–154.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A.
2010English filler-gap constructions. Language 86(3). 486–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1983 [1916]Course in general linguistics. Translated by Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court (first published in French in 1916).Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
2015Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profile. Anglia 133(4). 583–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, Alex
2015New Old Chinese. Diachronica 32(4). 571–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2015Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stassen, Leon
1985Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen
1996Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Torrent, Tiago Timponi
2015On the relation between inheritance and change: The Constructional convergence and construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1(1). 3–21. Slightly modified reprint in Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization – Theory and data, 87–105. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2013On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 473–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Cui
2016 “Hongtao yue lingluan” gai ruhe lijie? [How to interpret “hongtao yue linglun”?], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of Chinese Language] 5. 615–616.Google Scholar
Wold, Dag
1991A few properties of the…the… comparative constructions, In Matt Alexander & Monica Dressler (eds), Second Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistic Society of Midamerica (FLSM2) 272–281. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva
2018Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialization and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics 22(1). 149–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong
2017The constructionalization of a set of Chinese connectives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 46(1). 104–144.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019The development of the shì copula construction: A constructional perspective. Functions of Language 26(2). 139–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo & Yirong Chen
2003The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present, http://​ccl​.pku​.edu​.cn:8080​/ccl​_corpus
Zhang, Jiahe
2010 Chengdu fuci yue, yuefa de yufahua ji xiangguan wenti [The grammaticalization of the degree adverbs yue and yuefa ], Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Learning] 5. 69–75.Google Scholar
Zhu, Qizhi
2010 Suizhe A he yuelaiyue A de tongxian yanjiu jiqi lishi kaocha [A diachronic study on the co-occurrence of suizhe A and yuelaiyue A], Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Global Chinese Teaching] 1. 66–72.Google Scholar