Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 38:2 (2021) ► pp.151–188

The Tupí-Guaraní language family

A phylogenetic classification

ORCID logo | Universität Tübingen
| Universität Tübingen
Attempts to classify Tupí-Guaraní languages have so far been inconsistent with archaeological evidence and ignored information from historical sources. The case of Tupinambá is most illustrative in this regard. Using both Bayesian phylogenetic analysis and a stochastic algorithm that reconstructs phylogenetic trees by relying on maximum likelihood estimation, we suggest a new internal classification of the Tupí-Guaraní branch. The results of the analyses are in accordance with the most recent genetic research on Tupían populations and challenge previous classifications by suggesting, among others, that Tupinambá should not be considered a ‘Guaraní’ language.
Keywords: Tupí-Guaraní, Amazonian languages, phylogenetics, classification, South America, quantitative linguistics, language evolution, Tupinambá.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methods
    • 2.1Data and cognate assignment
    • 2.2NeighborNet network
    • 2.3Bayesian analyses
    • 2.4Maximum likelihood analysis
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Previous classifications
    • 4.1Sources of confusion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18032.fer
References (124)
References
Aguilar, Ana Maria Gouveia Cavalcanti. 2015. Contribuições para os estudos histórico-comparativos sobre a diversificação do sub-ramo vi da família linguística Tupí-Guaraní. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília dissertation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Fernando Ozorio de & Eduardo Góes Neves. 2015. Evidências arqueológicas para a origem dos Tupí-Guaraní no leste da Amazônia. Mana 21(3). 499–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Almeida Navarro, Eduardo. 2016. Método moderno de tupi antigo: A língua do Brasil dos primeiros séculos. Global 3rd edn.Google Scholar
de Anchieta, José. 1990. Arte de gramática da língua mais usada na costa do Brasil. Edições Loyola.Google Scholar
Balée, William L. 1994. Footprints of the forest: Ka’apor ethnobotany – the historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Graham. 2015. The evolution of life. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 2013. First migrants: Ancient migration in global perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Lauren Gawne, Susan Smythe Kung, Barbara F. Kelly, Tyler Heston, Gary Holton, Peter Pulsifer, David I. Beaver, Shobhana Chelliah, Stanley Dubinsky et al. 2018. Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics 56(1). 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Joseph Heled, Denise Kühnert, Tim Vaughan, Chieh-Hsi Wu, Dong Xie, Marc A. Suchard, Andrew Rambaut & Alexei J. Drummond. 2014. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS computational biology 10(4). e1003537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097). 957–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brochado, Jose Proenza. 1984. An ecological model of the spread of pottery and agriculture into Eastern South America. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign dissertation.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara. 1995. Contact-induced language change in the Western Amazon: The non-genetic origin of the Kokama language. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 3rd edn.Google Scholar
Cardim, Fernão. 1925. Tratado da terra e gente do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: J. Leite & Cia.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca. 2001. Genes, peoples, and languages. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, Paolo Menozzi & Alberto Piazza. 1994. The history and geography of human genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cruz, Daniel Gabriel da. 2008. Lar, doce lar? arqueologia Tupi na bacia do Ji-Paraná (RO): Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo MA thesis.Google Scholar
De Castro, Eduardo Viveiros. 2012. Araweté – os deuses canibais. Jorge Zahar.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf. 1990. More evidence for an internal classification of TupíGuaraní languages. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
. 2017. As línguas Tupí-Guaraní bolivianas e as de Rondônia: Novas hipóteses sobre as origens. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Drude, Sebastian. 2006. On the position of the Awetí language in the Tupí family. In Guarani y “Maweti-Tupí-Guaraní”. estudios historicos y descriptivos sobre una familia lingüistica de America del Sur, 11–45. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Drummond, Alexei J. & Remco R. Bouckaert. 2015. Bayesian evolutionary analysis with BEAST. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyen, Isidore. 1956. Language distribution and migration theory. Language 32(4). 611–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2009. Language classification, language contact, and Amazonian prehistory. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 581–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Love. 2011. Nature and culture in prehistoric Amazonia using GIS to reconstruct ancient ethnogenetic processes from archaeology, linguistics, geography, and ethnohistory, vol. 121. Lund University.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Love & Ana Vilacy Galucio. 2014. The Tupian expansion. In Loretta O’Connor & Pieter Muysken (eds.), The native languages of South America, 177–199. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ewens, Warren J. & Gregory R. Grant. 2006. Statistical methods in bioinformatics: An introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, Joseph. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39(4). 783–791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Ferraz Gerardi, Fabrício, Stanislav Reichert, Verena Blaschke, Eric DeMattos, Zhuge Gao, Mihai Manolescu & Nianheng Wu. 2020. TuLeD: Tupían Lexical Database. [URL]. Forthcoming.
Figueira, Luis & Julius Platzmann. 1687 (1878). Grammatica da lingua do Brasil. Leipzig: BG Teubner.Google Scholar
Forkel, Robert, Johann-Mattis List, Michael Cysouw, Christoph Rzymski, & Simon J Greenhill. 2018. cldf/cldf: CLDF 1.0.1 (Version v1.0.1). Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forline, Louis Carlos. 1997. The persistence and cultural transformation of the Guajá Indians: Foragers of Maranhao State, Brazil. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida dissertation. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Forster, Peter & Colin Renfrew. 2006. Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Gallois, Dominique Tilkin. 1980. Contribuição ao estudo do povoamento indígena da Guiana Brasileira: Um caso específico, os Waiãpi. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Gomes, Mércio Pereira. 1988. Os índios e o Brasil: Ensaio sobre um holocausto e sobre uma nova possibilidade de convivência. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
. 1991. O povo Guajá e as condições reais para sua sobrevivência. Centro Ecumenico de Documentacao e Informacao de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. 2015. Language phylogenies. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 208–229. Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. & Russell D. Gray. 2012. Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics: Issues of understanding and representation. Diachronica 29(4). 523–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(42). E8822–E8829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenand, Françoise. 1989. Dictionnaire wayãpi-français. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Guindon, Stéphane, Jean-François Dufayard, Vincent Lefort, Maria Anisi-mova, Wim Hordijk & Olivier Gascuel. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3). 307–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamming, Richard W. 1950. Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell Labs Technical Journal 29(2). 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harding, E. F. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Advances in Applied Probability 3(1). 44–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harmon, Luke. 2018. Phylogenetic comparative methods: Learning from trees. Privately published. [URL]
Holland, Barbara R., Katharina T. Huber, Andreas Dress & Vincent Moulton. 2002. δ plots: A tool for analyzing phylogenetic distance data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(12). 2051–2059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2). 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard. 2015. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(41). 12752–12757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard & Johann-Mattis List. 2016. Statistical and computational elaborations of the classical comparative method. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard & Søren Wichmann. 2016. Inferring the world tree of languages from word lists. In Seán Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluís Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th international conference (evolangx11).Google Scholar
Kolipakam, Vishnupriya, Fiona M. Jordan, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Remco Bouckaert, Russell D. Gray & Annemarie Verkerk. 2018. A Bayesian phylogenetic study of the Dravidian language family. Royal Society Open Science 5(3). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kracke, Waud H. 1978. Force and persuasion: Leadership in an Amazonian society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kracke, Waud H. & Mbahiranga Ivaga’nga. 2005. A posição histórica dos Parintintin na evolução das culturas Tupí-Guaraní. In Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara Cabral & A. D. Rodrigues (eds.), Trabalho apresentado no encontro internacional sobre as línguas e culturas dos povos Tupi. Laboratório de línguas indígenas, instituto linguistico, UNB. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Kruschke, John. 2015. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laraia, Roque de Barros. 1985. Uma etno-história Tupí. Revista de Antropologia 281. 25–32.Google Scholar
Lathrap, Donald Ward. 1970. The upper Amazon. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Lewis, M Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, vol. 161. Dallas, TX: SIL international. [URL]
Lewis, Paul O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic biology 50(6). 913–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis. 2016. Beyond cognacy: Historical relations between words and their implication for phylogenetic reconstruction. Journal of Language Evolution 1(2). 119–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Philippe Lopez & Eric Bapteste. 2016. Using sequence similarity networks to identify partial cognates in multilingual wordlists. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) 21. 599–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johann-Mattis List, Cormac Anderson, Tiago Tresoldi, Christoph Rzymski, Simon J Greenhill, & Robert Forkel. 2019. cldf/clts: Cross-Linguistic Transcription Systems (Version v1.2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann Mattis & Rzymski, Christoph & Greenhill, Simon & Schweikhard, Nathanael & Pianykh, Kristina & Tjuka, Annika & Wu, Mei-Shin & Hundt, Carolin & Tresoldi, Tiago & Forkel, Robert (eds.) 2020. Concepticon 2.4.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2020-11-16.)
Mallory, James P. 1997. The homelands of the Indo-Europeans. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language I: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 93–121. Routledge.Google Scholar
Marçoli, Osmar et al. 2018. Estudo comparativo dos dialetos da língua kawahib (Tupi-Guarani) tenharim, jiahui e amondawa. Campinas: Universidade de Campinas MA thesis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April & Robert McMahon. 2005. Language classification by numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Sebastian Drude. 2015. A summary reconstruction of Proto-Mawetí-Guaraní segmental phonology. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10(2). 275–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mello, Antônio A. S. & Andreas Kneip. 2006. Evidências linguísticas que apontam para a origem dos povos Tupi-Guarani no leste amazônico. In International congress of Americanists, vol. 521.Google Scholar
Mello, Antônio Augusto Souza. 2000. Estudo histórico da família linguística Tupí-Guaraní: Aspectos fonológicos e lexicais. Florianópolis: Universidade federal de Santa Catarina dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2002. Evidências fonológicas e lexicais para o sub-agrupamento interno Tupí-Guaraní. Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras. Fonologia, Gramática e História. Atas do I Encontro Internacional do GTLI da ANPOLL. Editora Universitária UFPA.Google Scholar
Mello, Antônio Augusto Souza & Andreas Kneip. 2017. Novas evidências linguísticas (e algumas arqueológicas) que apontam para a origem dos povos Tupí-Guaraní no leste amazônico. Literatura y lingüística 361. 299–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menendez, H. 1981. Uma contribuição para a etno-história da área Tapajós-Madeira. Revista do Museu Paulista Sao Paulo 281. 289–388.Google Scholar
Métraux, Alfred. 1927. Migrations historiques des Tupi-Guarani. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 19(1). 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michael, Lev David, Natalia Chousou-Polydouri, Keith Bartolomei, Erin Donnelly, Vivian Wauters, Sérgio Meira & Zachary O’hagan. 2015. A Bayesian phylogenetic classification of Tupí-Guaraní. LIAMES 15(2). 193–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migliazza, Ernest C. 1982. Linguistic prehistory and the refuge model in Amazonia. In G. T. Prance (ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics, 497–519. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Eurico Theofilo. 2009. A cultura cerâmica do tronco Tupí no alto Ji-Paraná, Rondônia, Brasil: Algumas reflexões teóricas, hipotéticas e conclusivas. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Antropológica 1(1). 35–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Lam-Tung, Heiko A. Schmidt, Arndt von Haeseler & Bui Quang Minh. 2014. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1). 268–274. DOI logo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Tandy Warnow. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 760–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nimuendajú, Curt. 1924. Os índios Parintintin do rio Madeira. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 161. 201–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nimuendaju, Curt. 1948a. The Cawahib, Parintintin and their neighbors. In Julian H. Steward (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 31, 283–297. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
. 1948b. The Guajá. In Julian H. Steward (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 31, 135–136. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Noelli, Francisco Silva. 1996. As hipóteses sobre o centro de origem e rotas de expansão dos Tupí. Revista de antropologia 39(2). 7–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The Tupí: Explaining origin and expansions in terms of archaeology and of historical linguistics. Antiquity 72(277). 648–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Martin A. 2006. Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life. Belknap. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Charles L. 2011. The comparative approach in evolutionary anthropology and biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Mark. 2000. Maximum-likelihood models for glottochronology and for reconstructing linguistic phylogenies. In Colin Renfrew, April McMahon & Lary Trask (eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, vol. 11, 189–207. Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Pagel, Mark, Quentin D. Atkinson, Andreea S. Calude & Andrew Meade. 2013. Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(21). 8471–8476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Mark, Quentin D. Atkinson & Andrew Meade. 2007. Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449(7163). 717–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramallo, Virginia, Rafael Bisso-Machado, Claudio Bravi, Michael D. Coble, Francisco M. Salzano, Tábita Hünemeier & Maria Cátira Bortolini. 2013. Demographic expansions in South America: Enlightening a complex scenario with genetic and linguistic data. American journal of physical anthropology 150(3). 453–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 2006. As línguas indígenas do Alto Madeira: Estatuto atual e bibliografia básica. Língua Viva 1(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri, Valdir Vegini & Maria Cristina Victorino de França. 2017. O Warázu do Guaporé (Tupi-Guaraní): Primeira descrição linguística. LIAMES 17(2). 411–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Darcy. 1996. Diários índios: Os Urubus-Kaapor. São Paulo: Editora Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Arion D. 1958. Classification of Tupí-Guaraní. International Journal of American Linguistics 24(3). 231–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. & Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara Cabral. 2002. Revendo a classificação interna da família Tupí-Guaraní. Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras. Fonologia, Gramática e História, Atas do I Encontro Internacional do GTLI da ANPOLL.Google Scholar
. 2012. Tupían. In Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The Indigenous Languages of South America, 495–574. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna. 1984. Relações internas na família lingüística Tupí-Guaraní. Revista de antropologia 27/281. 33–53.Google Scholar
. 1994. Línguas brasileiras: Para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas, vol. 111. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.Google Scholar
. 2000. Hipótese sobre as migrações dos três subconjuntos meridionais da família Tupi-Guarani. In Atas do ii congresso nacional da abralin, 1596–1605. Florianópolis: Associação Brasileira de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna & Wolf Dietrich. 1997. On the linguistic relationship between Mawé and Tupí-Guaraní. Diachronica 14(2). 265–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna, Arnaldo Hauptmann & Thekla Hartmann. 1964. A classificação do tronco lingüístico tupi. Revista de Antropologia 12(1/2). 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon DallIgna. 2007. Tupi languages in Rondônia and in Eastern Bolívia. In W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), Language endangerment and endangered languages: Linguistic and anthropological studies with special emphasis on the languages and cultures of the andean-amazonian border area. Indigenous Languages of Latin America series (ILLA), 355–363. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Rose, François. 2011. Grammaire del l’émérillon teko, une langue Tupí-Guaraní de Guyane Française. Peeters.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Noah A., Jonathan K. Pritchard, James L. Weber, Howard M. Cann, Kenneth K. Kidd, Lev A. Zhivotovsky & Marcus W. Feldman. 2002. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298(5602). 2381–2385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampaio, Wany Bernadete de Araujo. 1997. Estudo comparativo sincrônico entre o parintintin (tenharim) e o uru-eu-uau-uau (amondava): Contribuições para uma revisão na classificação das línguas tupí-kawahib. Campinas: Universidade de Campinas MA thesis.Google Scholar
Sampaio, WBA. 2001. As línguas tupí-kawahib: Um estudo sistemático e filogenético. Rondônia: Universidade de Rondônia dissertation.Google Scholar
Schleicher, Charles Owen. 1998. Comparative and internal reconstruction of the Tupi-Guarani language family. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan at Ann Arbor PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Corrêa-da Silva, Beatriz Carretta. 1997. Urubu-ka’apor–da gramática à história: A trajetória de um povo. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília MA thesis.Google Scholar
. 2000. Hipóteses sobre a história lingüística kaapór. II Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística e XIV Instituto Lingüístico. ABRALIN.Google Scholar
. 2007. Mais fundamentos para a hipótese de rodrigues (1984/1985) de um Proto-Awetí-Tupí-Guaraní. In Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara Rodrigues, AD; Cabral (ed.), Línguas e culturas tupí, vol. 11, 219–240. Campinas, SP: Nimuendajú.Google Scholar
. 2011. Mawé/Awetí/Tupí-Guaraní: Relações linguísticas e implicações históricas. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília dissertation.Google Scholar
Silva, Marcos Araújo Castro, Kelly Nunes, Renan Barbosa Lemes, Àlex Mas-Sandoval, Carlos Eduardo Guerra Amorim, Jose Eduardo Krieger, José Geraldo Mill, Francisco Mauro Salzano, Maria Cátira Bortolini, Alexandre da Costa Pereira et al. 2020. Genomic insight into the origins and dispersal of the Brazilian coastal natives. PNAS 117(5). 2372–2377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Silveira, Maura Imazio, Maria Christina Leal Rodrigues, Elisangela Oliveira & Louis-Martin Losier. 2008. Seqüência cronológica de ocupação na area do Salobo (Pará). Revista de Arqueologia 21(1). 61–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sokal, Robert R. & Charles Michner. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. University of Kansas science bulletin 281. 1409–1438.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Gabriel Soares. 1971. Tratado descritivo do Brasil em 1587. São Paulo: Companhia editora nacional.Google Scholar
Treece, Dave. 1987. Bound in misery and iron: The impact of the Grande Carajás Program on the Indians of Brazil. London: Survival International.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1996. On the geographical origins and dispersion of Tupían languages. Revista de Antropologia 39(2). 61–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. A história da cultura Brasileira segundo as línguas nativas. In Manuela Cerneiro da Cunha (ed.), História dos índios no Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 87–102. Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Vieira, Antônio. 1997. Cartas. vol. 1. organização de j.l. azevedo. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Walker, Robert S., Søren Wichmann, Thomas Mailund & Curtis J. Atkisson. 2012. Cultural phylogenetics of the Tupí language family in lowland South America. PloS one 7(4). e35025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. 2020. How to distinguish languages and dialects. Computational Linguistics 45(4). 823–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Sören, André Müller & Viveka Velupillai. 2010. Homelands of the worlds language families: A quantitative approach. Diachronica 27(2). 247–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai et al. 2011. The ASJP Database (version 14). [URL]. The ASJP Database (version 14).
Yang, Ziheng. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimpel Neto, Carlos Augusto. 2009. Na direção das periferias extremas da Amazônia: arqueologia na bacia do Rio Jiparaná. Rondônia: Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Carvalho, Fernando
2023. Proto-Tupi-Guarani had no palatalized velar stop. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 18:1 DOI logo
Castro e Silva, Marcos Araújo & Tábita Hünemeier
2023. A multidisciplinary overview on the Tupi‐speaking people expansion. American Journal of Biological Anthropology DOI logo
Ferraz Gerardi, Fabrício, Tiago Tresoldi, Carolina Coelho Aragon, Stanislav Reichert, Jonas Gregorio de Souza, Francisco Silva Noelli & Søren Wichmann
2023. Lexical phylogenetics of the Tupí-Guaraní family: Language, archaeology, and the problem of chronology. PLOS ONE 18:6 ► pp. e0272226 ff. DOI logo
Gerardi, Fabrício Ferraz, Carolina Coelho Aragon & Stanislav Reichert
2022. KAHD: Katukinan-Arawan-Harakmbut Database (Pre-release). Journal of Open Humanities Data 8 DOI logo
Gerardi, Fabrício Ferraz, Stanislav Reichert & Carolina Coelho Aragon
2021. TuLeD (Tupían lexical database): introducing a database of a South American language family. Language Resources and Evaluation 55:4 ► pp. 997 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.