Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:2 (2020) ► pp. 215263
References

References

AiG II,2 = Debrunner, Albert
1954Altindische Grammatik, vol. II,2: Die Nominalsuffixe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2013Where is non-active morphology? In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 244–262. CSLI publications.Google Scholar
2018able adjectives and the syntax of psych verbs. Glossa 3(1): 74, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
2008Structuring participles. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2015External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
2012The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou
2007Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia
2014The psych causative alternation. Lingua 148: 53–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J.
2003The middle voice in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003Participles and voice. In Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, David W. & Don Ringe
2015The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archaeological perspectives. Annual Review of Linguistics 2015(1): 199–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley
(eds.) 2007Deponency and morphological mismatches. Proceedings of the British Academy 145. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark & Nadya Vinokurova
2009On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85(3): 517–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert
1994Voice, aspect and Aktionsart: Middle and passive in Ancient Greek. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 23–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentein, Klaas
2012Perfect periphrases in Post-Classical and Early Byzantine Greek: An ecological-evolutionary account. Journal of Greek Linguistics 12: 205–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn
2011BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D.
2017Distributed morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2013By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16(1): 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1926Histoire du parfait grec. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
CHD = Güterbock, Hans G. and Harry A. Hoffner
1989The Hittite dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, vol. L-N. Chicago.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts
1993A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 299–345.Google Scholar
Cotticelli-Kurras, Paola & Velizar Sadovski
(eds.) 2017“In participle we predicate”: Con-tributions of the comparative and historical linguistics to grammar and semantics of participle. Wien: Holzhausen.Google Scholar
Cournane, Ailís
2017In defense of the child innovator. In Eric Mathieu & Robert Truswell (eds.), Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax, 10–24. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
Embick, David
1997aVoice and the interfaces of syntax. University of Pennsylvania dis-sertation.Google Scholar
1997bVoice systems and the syntax/morphology interface. In Heidi Harley (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, 41–72. MITWPL 32.Google Scholar
2000Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2): 185–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004aUnaccusative syntax and verbal alternations. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 137–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004bOn the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 355–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The morpheme. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
2007Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fellner, Hannes A.
2014Tocharian special agents: The nt-participle. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies 15: 53–67.Google Scholar
Fellner, Hannes A. & Laura Grestenberger
2018Die Reflexe der *-nt‑ und *-mh1no‑Partizipien im Hethitischen und Tocharischen. In Elisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 23. September 2015 in Marburg, 63–82. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Francez, Itamar & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2015Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language 91(3): 533–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frotscher, Michael
2013Das hethitische ‑ant-Partizip und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen: Semantik, Morphologie, Syntax. Università degli Studi di Verona dissertation.Google Scholar
Garcia Ramón, José Luis
2017Heterogenous correspondences and reconstruction: The ‘gerundive’ in ‑mi-na in Hieroglyphic Luvian. In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 85–103. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1996Wackernagel’s Law and unaccusativity in Hittite. In Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 85–134. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2008Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12: 195–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2009Cyclical change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2016aCyclical change continued. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bCyclical change continued: Introduction. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change continued, 3–17. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
George, Coulter H.
2005Expressions of agency in Ancient Greek. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura
2014Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
2016More span-conditioned allomorphy: Voice morphology in Classical Greek. In Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 46, vol. 2, 1–10. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
2017On the syntax of the participles of Indo-European deponent verbs. In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 105–117. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
2018Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language 94(3): 487–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Deponency in morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming a. The ín-group: Indo-Iranian in-stems and their Indo-European relatives. In a forthcoming Festschrift, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave.
. Forthcoming b. Two types of passive? Voice morphology and “low passives” in Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Akemi Matsuya & Eva-Maria Remberger eds. Passives cross-linguistically: Theoretical and experimental approaches, Leiden: Brill.
Hajnal, Ivo
1994Die lykischen a-stämme. Zum Werdegang einer Nominalklasse. In Jens Elmegård Rasmussen & Benedikte Nielsen (eds.), In honorem Holger Pedersen. Kol-loquium der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Kopenhagen 1993, 307–330. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark
2007Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2009The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Monika Rathert & Anastasia Giannadikou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
1999State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology. GLOT International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1994Passive participles across languages. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 151–177. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, Ryan
. Forthcoming. Disharmonic headedness in Homeric Greek and Tocharian and implications for Proto-Indo-European reconstruction. Proceedings of DiGS 20, University of York, June 18–21 2018.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. Jr. & H. Craig Melchert
2008A grammar of the Hittite language. Part I: Reference grammar. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Holton, David, Peter Mackridge & Irene Philippaki-Warburton
1997Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holton, David & Io Manolessou
2010Medieval and Early Modern Greek. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language, 539–563. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo
2018The Hittite middle voice. University of Bergamo dissertation.Google Scholar
Israel, Michael, Christopher Johnson & Patricia J. Brooks
2000From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 1003–1029.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton
2014The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, vol. I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald
1969Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H.
2003Hittite and the Indo-European verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The impact of Hittite and Tocharian: Rethinking Indo-European in the 20th Century and beyond. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Hand‑ book of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbucher zur Sprach‑ und Kommunikationswissenschaft 41(1)), 220–238. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2013(Non-)canonical passives and reflexives: Deponents and their like. In Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 337–358. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf & Hedde Zeijlstra
2014The Rich Agreement Hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4): 571–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2001Building statives. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on aspect (2000), 385–399. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2012Passive in the history of Greek: Evidence for the role of the passive suffix. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 87–121.Google Scholar
Le Feuvre, Claire, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault
(eds.) 2017Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu
1977Lateinische Laut‑ und Formenlehre. Lateinische Grammatik, vol. I. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
2006How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, John J.
2014Indo-European Caland adjectives in *-nt‑ and participles in Sanskrit. Historische Sprachforschung 127: 166–195.Google Scholar
2015Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit: The syntax and semantics of adjectival verb forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Transitive nouns and adjectives: Evidence from early Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2003On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manolessou, Io
2005From participles to gerunds. In Melitta Stavrou & Arhonto Terzi (eds.), Advances in Greek generative syntax: In honor of Dimitra Theophanopoulou-Kontou, 241–283. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4(2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig
1998The dialectal position of Anatolian within Indo-European. In Benjamin K. Bergen, Madelaine C. Plauché & Ashlee C. Bailey (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, special session on Indo-European subgrouping and internal relations, 24–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2014Anatolian nominal stems in *-(C)o-. In Norbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds.), Das Nomen im Indogermanischen. Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 14. bis 16. September 2011 in Erlangen, 205–214. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2017aThe source(s) of Indo-European participles in *-e/ont . In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 217–220.Google Scholar
2017b “Western affinities” of Anatolian. In Bjarne Simmelkjaer Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Annette Olsen (eds.), Etymology and the European lexikon. Akten der 14. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Kopenhagen, 17.-22. Sept., 2012, 297–305.Google Scholar
2018Hittite and Indo-European: Revolution and counter-revolution. In Elisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Arbeitstagung der lndogermanischen Gesellschaft, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 21. bis 23. September 2015, 289–294. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
. To appear. The position of Anatolian. In Andrew Garrett & Michael Weiss eds. Handbook of Indo-European studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, Gereon
2013Approaches to deponency. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(6): 351–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Maria
2017To what extent does the Greek participle participate in the passive voice system? In Paola Cotticelli-Kurras & Velizar Sadovski (eds.), “In participle we predicate”: Contributions of the comparative and historical linguistics to grammar and semantics of participle, 109–127. Wien: Holzhausen.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan J.
1976Caland’s “Law” and the Caland-System. Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
2017Agentive and other derivatives of ‘τóμος-type’ nouns. In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 233–266. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Oettinger, Norbert
1986“Indo-Hittite”-Hypothese und Wortbildung. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2001Neue Gedanken über das ‑nt-Suffix. In Onofrio Carruba & Wolfgang Meid (eds.), Anatolisch und Indogermanisch/Anatolico e Indoeuropeo. Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Pavia, 22.-25. September 1998, 301–315. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2017Der Ursprung des indogermanischen Caland-Systems und die nt‑Stämme. In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 267–275. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel
1999On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology MA thesis.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Karlos Arregi
2005Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 16(1): 43–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos, Vassilios Spyropoulos & Anthi Revithiadou
2017Little v as a categorizing verbal head: Evidence from Greek. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papangeli, Dimitra & Nikolaos Lavidas
2009Deponents and non-finite constructions in Greek. In Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman & David Hill (eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MIT. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57, 197–211.Google Scholar
Rau, Jeremy
2009Indo-European nominal morphology: The decads and the Caland system Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Rieken, Elisabeth
2009Der Archaismus des Hethitischen – eine Bestandsaufnahme. Incontri Linguistici 32: 37–52.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don
1988–1990[1991]Evidence for the position of Tocharian in the Indo-European family? Die Sprache 34: 59–123.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Joseph F. Eska
2013Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor
2002Indo-European and computational cladis-tics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(1): 59–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2007Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammat-icalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia
2009The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 129–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Klaus T.
1992Archaismen des Tocharischen und ihre Bedeutung für Fragen der Rekonstruktion und der Ausgliederung. In Robert Beekes, Alexander Lubotsky & Jos Weitenberg (eds.), Rekonstruktion und relative Chronologie. Akten der VIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Leiden, 31. Aug.-4. Sept. 1987, 101–112. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1939Griechische Grammatik, vol. I: Allgemeiner Teil, Lautlehre, Wort-bildung, Flexion . Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
1943Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechischen. Berlin: Abh. d. preuß. Akad. d. Wissensch., Jahrg 1942.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner
1950Griechische Grammatik, vol. II: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik . Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2016How are words related? In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 1–26. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann
1994The change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 6: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, David
2011Reconstructing last week’s weather: Syntactic reconstruction and Brythonic free relatives. Journal of Linguistics 47: 407–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Werner
1998Lexical archaisms in the Tocharian languages. In Victor H. Mair (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of Western Central Asia. Vol. I, Archeology, migration and nomadism, linguistics, 347–357. Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Wodtko, Dagmar S., Britta Irslinger & Carolin Schneider
(eds.) 2008Nomina im Indoger-manischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Zombolou, Katerina
2004Verbal alternations in Greek: A semantic analysis. University of Reading dissertation.Google Scholar
Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou
2014The canonical function of the deponent verbs in Modern Greek. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012, 331–344. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar