Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:1 (2020) ► pp. 1–42

Grammaticalization without Feature Economy

Evidence from the Voice Cycle in Hungarian

| Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
The present paper is a corpus-based study of the Voice Cycle in Hungarian. Based on data from the Old Hungarian Corpus and the Hungarian Historical Corpus, I will argue that while in Old Hungarian, middle voice was encoded through a separate inflectional paradigm (contextual allomorphy in the subject agreement suffix conditional on the feature content of a silent Voice head), in Modern Hungarian, middle voice is encoded through dedicated middle voice suffixes (i.e., the Voice head is spelled out overtly). I will claim that the underlying grammaticalization process involved the reanalysis of frequentative suffixes (v heads) as middle voice suffixes (Voice heads). I will show that this reinterpretation was not based on shared abstract features, but rather, on a principled correlation between middle voice and frequentative aspect: since some types of middles (antipassives and dispositional middles) were more likely to be associated with a frequentative or habitual reading than actives, frequentative suffixes were susceptible to reanalysis as middle suffixes in the course of language acquisition. I will thus claim that in addition to Feature Economy (van Gelderen 2011), reinterpretation based on correlation between featurally independent grammatical markers should also be regarded as a mechanism of grammaticalization.
Keywords: grammaticalization, cycles, voice, middles, syntax, morphology, Hungarian
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 07 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19008.hal

Full-text

Grammaticalization without Feature Economy
References

References

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica 34(4). 437–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2014 Roots in transitivity alternations: afto/auto reflexives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
2012 The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48. 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2015 External arguments in alternations: A layering approach. Vol. 55. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
2012 Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter
1981 A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 373–415.Google Scholar
1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bárány, András
2017 Person, case, and agreement: The morphosyntax of inverse agreement and global case splits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartos, Huba
1999 Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció. A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere. [Morphosyntax and interpretation. The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena in Hungarian.] PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd
1967 A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. [A Historical-Etymological Dictionary of Hungarian.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath
2008 The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology & Department of Linguistics of the University of Leipzig. Retrieved January, 28, 2010.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2000 The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.), University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol. 10. 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2012 Universals in comparative morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Heidi Harley
2017 Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. In Heather Newell, Maire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.), The structure of words at the interfaces, 141–159. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke
1991 Case and agreement in Inuit. Berlin and New York: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budenz, József
1884 Az ugor nyelvek összehasonlító alaktana. [The comparative morphology of Uralic Languages.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (18)2. 161–319.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist program. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts
1993 A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 299–345.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1979 Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 219–240. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Anne
1988 The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D. Bartha, Katalin
1991 Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana – A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei. [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and before.], 60–103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
1992 Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 55–119. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Deme, László & Samu Imre
1968–77 A magyar nyelvjárások atlasza I-VI. [Dialect atlas of Hungarian I-VI.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva
2011 A profile of the Hungarian DP. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane
2000 Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 253–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
1999 On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4. 137–178.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972 The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dömötör, Adrienne
2013 Az ó- és középmagyar kori magánéleti nyelvhasználat morfológiailag elemzett adatbázisa. [A morphologically annotated database of vernacular language use in Old and Middle Hungarian.] In Fazakas, Emese, Dezső Juhász, Csilla T. Szabó, Erika Terbe & Borbála Zsemlyei (eds.), Tér, idő és kultúra metszéspontjai a magyar nyelvben. [The intersection of space, time and culture in Hungarian], 11–12. Budapest-Cluj. Nemzetközi Magyarságtudományi Társaság – ELTE Magyar Nyelvtörténeti, Szociolingvisztikai és Dialektológiai Tanszék.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2010 Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
E. Abaffy, Erzsébet
1978 A mediális igékről. [On middle verbs.] Magyar Nyelv 74, 280–293.Google Scholar
1992 Az igei személyragozás. [Verbal conjugation.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 184–238.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002 The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2008 A mentalist interpretation of grammaticalization theory. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D.
1984 West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1990 Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van
2004 For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12:2, 135–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2004 Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E.
2005 Multiple antipassives in Halkomelem Salish. In Kratzer, A., Conathan, L. J., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A., & Alan, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26. 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B., & Hukari, Thomas E.
2006 The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics, 44–81.Google Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura
2014 Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
2018 Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language 94(3). 487–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1990 An approach to morphology. In Juli Carter, Rose-Marie Déchaine, Bill Philip & Tim Sherer (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 150–184. Amherst (MA): Graduate Linguistic Student Association of the University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subjects, events, and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
2000 Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon/encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M. H.
1991 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András
2000 A műveltetés [Causativization]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 3: Morphology], 215–292. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Vladimir Nedjalkov & Maria Polinskaja
1988 Antipassive in Chukchee. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1990 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
1995 Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Márkus, Andrea
2015 Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. Undiagnosed species and a complete derivation of the morphosyntactic patterns. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2015 How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 273–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James L.
1982 Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
2007 Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38 4. 671–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newson, Mark
2010 Syntax first, words after: A possible consequence of doing Alignment Syntax without a lexicon. In Varga, László (ed.), The even yearbook 9. School of English and American studies working papers in linguistics, 1–46. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha & Robert C. Berwick
1997 Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 697–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novák, Attila, György Orosz & Nóra Wenszky
2013 Morphological annotation of Old and Middle Hungarian corpora. In Piroska Lendvai and Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences and Humanities, 43–48. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1992 Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
1997 Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Polinskaja, Maria & Vladimir Nedjalkov
1987 Contrasting the absolutive in Chukchee: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. Lingua 71. 239–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013 Antipassive. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2017 Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rákosi, György
2008 The inherently reflexive and the inherently reciprocal predicate in Hungarian: Each to their own argument structure. In Ekkehard König and Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 411–450. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Lexical items in complex predications: Selection and underassociation. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R. Hutás, Magdolna
1972 Az ikes ragozás állapota Révai Miklós korában. [The status of the ik verbal paradigm in the times of Miklós Révai.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2015 Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41(1–2). 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou
2003 Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, Marta
2017 On the syntax of missing objects: A study with special reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008 The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter, Zaenen, Annie and Zec, Draga
1987 Reflexivization variation: Relations between syntax, semantics, and lexical structure. In Masayo Iida, Stephen Wechsler & Draga Zec (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Volume I: Interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse, 169–238. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Simonyi, Zsigmond
1878 A visszaható igének egy különös haszálata. [On a peculiar usage of the reflexive verb.] Magyar Nyelvőr 7. 481–493.Google Scholar
1880 A magyar gyakorító és mozzanatos igék képzése. [The derivation of frequentative and semelfactive verbs in Hungarian.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 18. 237–269.Google Scholar
1905 Az ikes ragozás története. [The history of the -ik conjugation.] Magyar Nyelvőr 34. 1–11, 113–119, 337–349, 393–401, 444–454, 495–501.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter
2014 Corpus building from Old Hungarian codices. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass
2012 Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből. [Language technology and cultural heritage: Building corpora from Old Hungarian Codices.] Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 24. 243–264.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2012 Viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut: The syntax and semantics of antipassives. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2012 Look both ways: Outward-looking allomorphy in Icelandic participles. LingBuzz. Available online at http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001519 (accessed April 11, 2018).
Terrill, Angela
1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17. 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988 Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 595–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Laurel
1984 A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred and Jacquelina Evers-Vermeul
2002 Pronouns and case. Lingua 112. 301–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
2003 Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar