Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:1 (2020) ► pp. 142

Full-text

Grammaticalization without Feature Economy
References

References

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2017From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica 34(4). 437–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2014Roots in transitivity alternations: afto/auto reflexives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron
2012The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48. 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2015External arguments in alternations: A layering approach. Vol. 55. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
2012Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter
1981A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 373–415.Google Scholar
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bárány, András
2017Person, case, and agreement: The morphosyntax of inverse agreement and global case splits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartos, Huba
1999Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció. A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere. [Morphosyntax and interpretation. The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena in Hungarian.] PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd
1967A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. [A Historical-Etymological Dictionary of Hungarian.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath
2008The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology & Department of Linguistics of the University of Leipzig. Retrieved January, 28, 2010.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2000The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.), University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol. 10. 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2012Universals in comparative morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Heidi Harley
2017Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. In Heather Newell, Maire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.), The structure of words at the interfaces, 141–159. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke
1991Case and agreement in Inuit. Berlin and New York: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budenz, József
1884Az ugor nyelvek összehasonlító alaktana. [The comparative morphology of Uralic Languages.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (18)2. 161–319.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist program. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts
1993A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 299–345.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1979Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 219–240. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Anne
1988The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D. Bartha, Katalin
1991Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana – A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei. [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and before.], 60–103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
1992Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 55–119. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Deme, László & Samu Imre
1968–77A magyar nyelvjárások atlasza I-VI. [Dialect atlas of Hungarian I-VI.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva
2011A profile of the Hungarian DP. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane
2000Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 253–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
1999On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4. 137–178.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dömötör, Adrienne
2013Az ó- és középmagyar kori magánéleti nyelvhasználat morfológiailag elemzett adatbázisa. [A morphologically annotated database of vernacular language use in Old and Middle Hungarian.] In Fazakas, Emese, Dezső Juhász, Csilla T. Szabó, Erika Terbe & Borbála Zsemlyei (eds.), Tér, idő és kultúra metszéspontjai a magyar nyelvben. [The intersection of space, time and culture in Hungarian], 11–12. Budapest-Cluj. Nemzetközi Magyarságtudományi Társaság – ELTE Magyar Nyelvtörténeti, Szociolingvisztikai és Dialektológiai Tanszék.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2010Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
E. Abaffy, Erzsébet
1978A mediális igékről. [On middle verbs.] Magyar Nyelv 74, 280–293.Google Scholar
1992Az igei személyragozás. [Verbal conjugation.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 184–238.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2008A mentalist interpretation of grammaticalization theory. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D.
1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1990Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van
2004For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12:2, 135–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2004Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E.
2005Multiple antipassives in Halkomelem Salish. In Kratzer, A., Conathan, L. J., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A., & Alan, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26. 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B., & Hukari, Thomas E.
2006The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics, 44–81.Google Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura
2014Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
2018Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language 94(3). 487–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1990An approach to morphology. In Juli Carter, Rose-Marie Déchaine, Bill Philip & Tim Sherer (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 150–184. Amherst (MA): Graduate Linguistic Student Association of the University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995Subjects, events, and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
2000Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon/encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M. H.
1991Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András
2000A műveltetés [Causativization]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 3: Morphology], 215–292. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Vladimir Nedjalkov & Maria Polinskaja
1988Antipassive in Chukchee. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1990Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
1995Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Márkus, Andrea
2015Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. Undiagnosed species and a complete derivation of the morphosyntactic patterns. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2015How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 273–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James L.
1982Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
2007Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38 4. 671–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newson, Mark
2010Syntax first, words after: A possible consequence of doing Alignment Syntax without a lexicon. In Varga, László (ed.), The even yearbook 9. School of English and American studies working papers in linguistics, 1–46. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha & Robert C. Berwick
1997Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 697–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novák, Attila, György Orosz & Nóra Wenszky
2013Morphological annotation of Old and Middle Hungarian corpora. In Piroska Lendvai and Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences and Humanities, 43–48. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1992Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
1997Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Polinskaja, Maria & Vladimir Nedjalkov
1987Contrasting the absolutive in Chukchee: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. Lingua 71. 239–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013Antipassive. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2017Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rákosi, György
2008The inherently reflexive and the inherently reciprocal predicate in Hungarian: Each to their own argument structure. In Ekkehard König and Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 411–450. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Lexical items in complex predications: Selection and underassociation. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R. Hutás, Magdolna
1972Az ikes ragozás állapota Révai Miklós korában. [The status of the ik verbal paradigm in the times of Miklós Révai.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2015Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41(1–2). 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, Marta
2017On the syntax of missing objects: A study with special reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter, Zaenen, Annie and Zec, Draga
1987Reflexivization variation: Relations between syntax, semantics, and lexical structure. In Masayo Iida, Stephen Wechsler & Draga Zec (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Volume I: Interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse, 169–238. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Simonyi, Zsigmond
1878A visszaható igének egy különös haszálata. [On a peculiar usage of the reflexive verb.] Magyar Nyelvőr 7. 481–493.Google Scholar
1880A magyar gyakorító és mozzanatos igék képzése. [The derivation of frequentative and semelfactive verbs in Hungarian.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 18. 237–269.Google Scholar
1905Az ikes ragozás története. [The history of the -ik conjugation.] Magyar Nyelvőr 34. 1–11, 113–119, 337–349, 393–401, 444–454, 495–501.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter
2014Corpus building from Old Hungarian codices. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass
2012Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből. [Language technology and cultural heritage: Building corpora from Old Hungarian Codices.] Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 24. 243–264.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2012Viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut: The syntax and semantics of antipassives. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2012Look both ways: Outward-looking allomorphy in Icelandic participles. LingBuzz. Available online at http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001519 (accessed April 11, 2018).
Terrill, Angela
1997The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17. 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 595–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Laurel
1984A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred and Jacquelina Evers-Vermeul
2002Pronouns and case. Lingua 112. 301–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
2003Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar