Article published in:
Diachronic Dimensions of Alignment TypologyEdited by Eystein Dahl
[Diachronica 38:3] 2021
► pp. 314–357
Two types of alignment change in nominalizations
Austronesian and Japanese
Edith Aldridge | Academia Sinica
Yuko Yanagida | University of Tsukuba
This paper investigates two instances of alignment change, both of which resulted from reanalysis of a nominalized
embedded clause type, in which the external argument was marked with genitive case and the internal argument was focused. We show
that a subject marked with genitive case in the early development of Austronesian languages became ergative-marked when object
relative clauses in cleft constructions were reanalyzed as transitive root clauses. In contrast to this, the genitive case in Old
Japanese nominalized clauses, marking an external argument, was extended to mark all subjects. This occurred after adnominal
clauses were reanalyzed as root clauses. Japanese underwent one more step in order for genitive to be reanalyzed as nominative:
the reanalysis of impersonal psych transitive constructions as intransitives.With these two case studies of Austronesian and Japanese, we show that reanalysis of nominalization goes in
either direction, ergative or accusative, depending on the syntactic conditions involved in the reanalysis.
Keywords: active-inactive, cleft, nominative case, psych predicate, split-ergativity, syntactic reconstruction, unaccusative
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Genitive to ergative in Austronesian
- 2.1Previous connections between Austronesian clause structure and nominalization
- 2.2Reanalysis
- 2.3Summary
- 3.Genitive to nominative in Japanese
- 3.1Two types of genitive markers in Old Japanese
- 3.2After OJ: A change from active to accusative alignment
- 3.3Reanalysis
- 3.3.1Psych predicate constructions
- 3.3.2Impersonal psych transitive constructions in Old Japanese
- 3.3.3After OJ: Psych predicate constructions
- 3.4Summary
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
Digitalized texts -
References
Published online: 23 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19044.ald
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19044.ald
References
Digitalized texts
The Corpus of Historical Japanese (CHJ), the National Institute of Japanese Language
and Linguistics
Aldridge, Edith
2004 Ergativity
and word order in Austronesian languages. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University dissertation.
2018 Reconstructing
Proto-Austronesian alignment. Paper presented at the 20th
Diachronic Generative Syntax conference (DIGS 20), York
University, UK.
Anderson, Stephen
Baker, Mark
Benveniste, Emil
Bubenik, Vit
Butt, Miriam
Butt, Miriam & Ashwini Deo
Bynon, Theodora
Chang, Henry Y.
Chen, Cheng-Fu
Chomsky, Noam
Comrie, Bernard
Dahl, Eystein
De Guzman, Videa P.
Fischer, Olga & van der Leek, Frederike
Frellesvig, Bjarke, Stephen, Horn & Yuko Yanagida
Gair, James W.
1983[1998] Non-configurationality,
movement, and Sinhala focus. Paper presented at the Linguistic
Association of Great Britain, Newcastle, September
1983. [Published in
Gair 1998:50–64].
van Gelderen, Elly
Gerdts, Donna B.
Haas, Mary R.
Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
Hook, Peter
Kaufman, Daniel
Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie
Kikuta, Ciharu
Klaiman, Miriam H.
Langacker, Ronald W.
Liao, Hsiu-chuan
Malchukov, Andrej
Mithun, Marianne
Ohno, Susumu
Payne, Thomas
Pray, Bruce R.
Ross, Malcolm
2009 Proto
Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal. In K. Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pauley (eds.), Austronesian
historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust (Pacific Linguistics
601), 295–326. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Schachter, Paul
Shibatani, Masayoshi
Silverstein, Michael
Slade, Benjamin
Starosta, Stanley
2001 Reduplication
and the subgrouping of Formosan languages. Paper presented at
the International Symposium on Austronesian Cultures: Issues relating to Taiwan, Academia
Sinica. Published in Elizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), Formosan
linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s
contributions, vol. 21, 801–834. Taipei: Language and Linguistics 2009.
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew K. Pawley & Lawrence A. Reid
1982/2009 The
evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim, Lois Carrington & S. A. Wurm (eds.), Papers
from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Vol. 2: Tracking the
travellers (Pacific Linguistics
C-65). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 145–170 (republished
in Elizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), Formosan
linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions. Vol. 2: Publications on Formosan languages (Language
and Linguistics Monograph Series
C6–65). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 297–328 [with an expanded version of the
paper, with the same title, published for the first time in the same volume, 329–481]).
Tan, Cindy Ro-lan
Teng, Stacy F. & Elizabeth Zeitoun
Tsuboi, Yoshiki
Whitman, John
Wolff, John
Woolford, Ellen
Yamada, Masahiro
Yanagida, Yuko
2017 Genitive/active
to nominative case in Japanese: The role of complex experiencer constructions. Paper presented
at the
23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, The University of
Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio.
2019 The
origin of dative subjects and psych predicate constructions in Japanese. Paper given at
the
24th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Australian National
University, Canberra, Australia (to appear in Journal of
Historical Linguistics
).
Yanagida, Yuko & John Whitman