Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:2 (2022) ► pp. 268309
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon
1998Evidentials and areal typology: A case study from Amazonia. Language Sciences 20(3). 241–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Randy J. LaPolla
2007New perspectives on evidentials: A view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
2003Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atshogs, Yeshes Vodgsal (意西微薩·阿錯)
2004Daohua yanjiu (倒話研究) [A study of the Daohua language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter
2003Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 107–150. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger & Mark W. Post
2014Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 71–104. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
2001aSynchrony and diachrony of Sinitic languages: A brief history of Chinese dialects. In Hilary Chappell (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001bA typology of evidential markers in Sinitic languages. In Hilary Chappell (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 56–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The Compiling Committee of the Annals of Zhongdian County in Yunnan Province
(雲南省中甸縣地方志編纂委員會) 1997Zhongdian xianzhi (中甸縣志) [The Annals of Zhongdian County]. Kunming: Yunnan Nationalities Publishing House.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2009Sino-Tibetan languages. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages (2nd edn), 693–702. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Mingjun (丁明俊)
2006Zhongguo bianyuan Musilin zuqun de renleixue kaocha (中國邊緣穆斯林族群的人類學考察) [An anthropological investigation into the marginal Muslim groups in China]. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2005Areal diffusion and the development of evidentiality. Studies in Language 29(3). 617–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque
2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.
1978On the semantic and morphological influence of Turkish on Balkan Slavic. In Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen & Karol W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 108–118. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Garrett, Edward John
2001Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
Jacques, Guillaume
2019Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug. Language and Linguistics 20(4). 515–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha, Marja Peltomaa, Erika Sandman & Xiawu Dongzhou
2008Wutun (Languages of the World/Materials 466). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2017Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3. (https://​tel​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/tel​-01571916v4) [accessed on 18 October 2020].
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing (劉丹青)
2017Yufa diaocha yanjiu shouce (語法調查研究手冊) [A handbook of grammatical investigation and research]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2015The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus (STEDT). Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project. (http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/dissemination​/STEDT​.pdf) [accessed on 18 October 2020]
Matthews, Stephen
1998Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5!. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 325–334. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1986The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 239–257. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Oisel, Guillaume
2017Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics 16(2). 90–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Gerald & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2018Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies 52(4). 1227–1278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
2019Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(21). 10317–10322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe
2018Egophoricity: An introduction. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 1–78. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandman, Erika
2016A grammar of Wutun. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Sandman, Erika & Camille Simon
2016Tibetan as a “model language” in the Amdo Sprachbund: Evidence from Salar and Wutun. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 3(1). 85–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1955Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 11(1). 94–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Shuo (石碩), Jin Li (李錦) & Libo Zou (鄒立波)
2014Jiaorong yu Hudong: Zangyi Zoulang de Minzu, Lishi yu Wenhua (交融與互動:藏彝走廊的民族、歷史與文化) [Integration and interaction: The ethnic groups, history and culture along the Tibeto-Lolo Corridor]. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Simon, Camille
2016Morphosyntaxe et sémantique grammaticale du salar et du tibétain de l’Amdo: analyse d’un contact de langues. PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3. (https://​tel​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/tel​-01542960) [accessed on 18 October 2020]
2018Evidential modalities in Salar: The development of a Tibetan-like egophoric category. Turkic Languages 22(1). 3–35.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
2012Multiple usages of the verb ‘snang’ in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics 11(1). 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016In defense of prepalatal non-fricative sounds and symbols: Towards the Tibetan dialectology. Researches in Asian Languages 101. 99–125.Google Scholar
2017The evidential system of Zhollam Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 423–444. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo
2018 Kamutibettogo Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no zyutubu ni hyoozi sareru syookosei カムチベット語塔公[Lhagang]方言の述部に標示される証拠性 [Evidential system of verb predicates in Lhagang Tibetan]. Gengo Kijutsu Ronshu 言語記述論集 [Journal of Kijutsuken, Descriptive Linguistic Circle] 101. 13–42. (URI: http://​id​.nii​.ac​.jp​/1422​/00002000/) [accessed on 18 October 2020].
Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Sonam Wangmo & Tsering Samdrup
2021A contrastive approach to the evidential system in Tibetic languages: Examining five varieties from Khams and Amdo. Gengo Kenkyu 言語研究 [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 1591. 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2003A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: The interaction between language contact, change, and inheritance. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–21. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla
2003/2017The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edn). London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1992La déixis en tibétain: Quelques faits remarquables. In Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds.), La deixis: Colloque en Sorbonne, 197–208. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
2017A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 95–129. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso
2001Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 24(1). 49–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 37(2). 240–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsering Samdrup & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2018Evidential system in Mabzhi Tibetan of Amdo. Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (Kyoto University, Kyoto 25–28 September). (URL: http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2433​/235311) [accessed on 18 October 2020]
Tshe-brten Don-grub (次旦頓珠) & Ye-shes Chos-sgron (益西曲珍)
2010 “Zangmu zhi lu” de huizang guanxi: Yunnan Sheng Xianggelila Sanba Xiang Annan Cun tianye diaocha (“藏穆之路”的回藏關係:雲南省香格里拉三壩鄉安南村田野調查) [The relationship between Tibetan and Hui Peoples: A field study at Annan Village of Sanba Town, Shangri-La, Yunnan Province]. Xizang Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) (西藏大學學報(社會科學版)) [Journal of Tibet University (Social Sciences Edition)] 25(4). 96–100.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
2015Tibeto-Burman. In William S-Y. Wang & Chaofen Sun (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 135–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vokurková, Zuzana
2008Epistemic modalities in spoken standard Tibetan. PhD dissertation, Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8.
Wang, Feng
2015Language contact between Tibeto-Burman languages and Chinese. In William S-Y. Wang & Chaofen Sun (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 248–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Caide (薛才德)
2006 Annan Shuimofang Hanyu yufa de jiechu bianyi (安南水磨房漢語語法的接觸變異) [On the contact-induced grammatical changes of the Shuimofang Chinese dialect in Annan Village]. Yunnan Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehuikexue Ban) (雲南民族大學(哲學社會科學版)) [Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)] 23(5). 224–228.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina
2018aEvidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in the Tibetic languages. In Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder (eds.), Evidence for evidentiality, 227–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bDon’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself!--- Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi (extended version). Himalayan Linguistics 17(1). 67–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Hanzhi, Ting Ji, Mark Pagel & Ruth Mace
2020Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages. Scientific Reports 10(20792). 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
2019Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 569(7754). 112–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zhongyun (章忠雲) & Yimin Ding (丁益民)
1995 Annan Mofang Cun shuangyu xianxiang chutan (安南磨房村雙語現象初探) [A preliminary study on the bilingualism of Mofang Village of Annan]. Xinan Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) (西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版)) [Journal of Southwestern College of Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)] (3). 100–105.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yang (周洋)
2018 Yunnan Shuimofanghua de gebiaoji jiqi laiyuan (雲南水磨房話的格標記及其來源) [The case marking system and its development in Selibu]. Fangyan (方言) [Dialect] 40(3). 357–369.Google Scholar
2021 Shuimofanghua de zhishi jiegou (水磨房話的致使結構) [The causative constructions in Selibu]. Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan (語言研究集刊) [Bulletin of Linguistic Studies] 271. 323–349.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yang (周洋) & Hiroyuki Suzuki (鈴木博之)
2020 Shuimofanghua ti fanchou de hunhe tezhen (水磨房話體範疇的混合特征) [The hybrid features of the aspect system in Selibu]. Minzu Yuwen 民族語文 [Minority Languages of China] (4). 43–56.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong (朱曉農)
2010Yuyinxue (語音學) [Phonetics]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar