Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 38:4 (2021) ► pp.601–627

Phonological change and interdialectal differences between Egyptian and Coptic: ḏ, ṯ → c = ϫ versus ḏ, ṯ → t = ⲧ

ORCID logo | Freie Universität Berlin
The development of the Egyptian palatals ḏ and ṯ has long been a thorny issue in Egyptian linguistics. No convincing phonological rule for it has been identified so far. In the present paper I argue that the distribution of these phonemes is the result of inter-dialectal borrowings between a pre-Coptic dialect (C‑Dialect) in which ḏ , ṯ → c = ϫ and a pre-Coptic dialect (T‑Dialect) in which ḏ , ṯ → t = ⲧ. It is then argued that the attested Coptic dialects derive from T‑Dialects with lexical borrowings from C‑Dialects. A preliminary discussion of the sociolinguistic contexts of these dialects is presented in the second part of the article, where it is suggested that the C‑Dialect may have been associated with the area of the cities of Avaris/Pi-Ramses/Tanis and may have become a prestigious dialect and thus a source of lexical borrowings starting from the 19th dynasty.
Keywords: Egyptology, Egyptian, Late Egyptian, Coptic, dialects, palatals, Historical Phonology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The issue
  • 3.Previous hypotheses: Discussion
  • 4.The data: A diachronic pattern
  • 5.Interpretation: Inter-dialectal borrowings
  • 6.Improving the model
  • 7.Verification: Semantic distribution in Coptic
  • 8.C‑Dialect and T-dialect: Where and when
    • 8.1Coptic
    • 8.2New Kingdom
    • 8.3Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period
    • 8.4Old Kingdom
  • 9.Toponyms
  • 10.One or more borrowing events?
  • 11.A K-dialect as well?
  • 12.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Online appendix
    • Appendix A.
      • ḏ → c = ϫ
      • ḏ → c = ϫ and t = ⲧ
      • ḏ → t = ⲧ
      • ṯ → c = ϫ
      • ṯ → t = ⲧ
      • ṯ → ∅ / _#
      • ṯ + z → c = ϫ
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19076.kil
References (26)
References
Allen, James P. 2005. The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. Writings from the Ancient World 23. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
2013. The Ancient Egyptian language: An historical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Grammar of the Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. Languages of the Ancient Near East 7. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breasted, James Henry. 1930. The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 3–4. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav. 1976. Coptic etymological dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crum, Walter Ewing. 1939. A Coptic dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Edel, Elmar. 1955. Altägyptische Grammatik. Analecta Orientalia 34. Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Goren, Yuval, Israel Finkelstein, Nadav Naʼaman, and Michal Artzy. 2004. Inscribed in clay: Provenance study of the Amarna Tablets and other Ancient Near Eastern texts. Monograph Series (Makhon Le-Arkheʼologyah ʿa. Sh. Sonyah u-Marḳo Nadler) 23. Tel Aviv: Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, and Uri Tadmor. (eds.). 2009. Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoch, James E. 1994. Semitic words in Egyptian texts of the New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo. 1997. The Amarna scholarly tablets. Cuneiform Monographs 9. Groningen: Styx.Google Scholar
Kammerzell, Frank. 1998. The sounds of a dead language: Reconstructing Egyptian phonology. Göttinger Beträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 11. 21–41.Google Scholar
Kilani, Marwan. 2019. Vocalisation in group writing. A new proposal. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loprieno, Antonio. 1995. Ancient Egyptian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morales, Antonio J. 2013. The transmission of the Pyramid Texts into the Middle Kingdom: Philological aspects of a continuous tradition in Egyptian mortuary literature. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Motte, Aurore. 2018. Les Reden und Rufe dans les tombes privées de l’Ancien Empire à la Basse Époque: Édition et commentaire philologique. PhD Dissertation, Liège.Google Scholar
Osing, Jürgen. 1980. Lautsystem. In Wolfgang Helck, Eberhard Otto, and Wolfhart Westendorf (eds.). Lexikon der Ägyptologie, III:cols, 944–949. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Peust, Carsten. 1999. Egyptian phonology: An introduction to the phonology of a dead language. Monographien zur Ägyptischen Sprache 2. Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim Friedrich. 2013. Von der Vielfalt der ägyptischen Sprache in der griechisch‑ römischen Zeit. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 1401. 36–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roquet, Gerard. 1973. Incompatibilités dans la racine en ancien Égyptien. Göttinger Miszellen 61. 107–17.Google Scholar
Rössler, Otto. 1971. Das Ägyptische als semitische Sprache. In Christentum Am Roten Meer, edited by F. Altheim and R. Stichl, 263–326. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steindorff, Gerog. 1892. Das Altägyptische Alphabet und seine Umschreibung. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 461. 709–30.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1952. Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 961. 452–63.Google Scholar
Vycichl, Werner. 1934. Das ägyptische Vokalisationsproblem. Mélanges Maspero 11. 385–92.Google Scholar
. 1984. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue copte. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Winand, Jean. 2016. Dialects in Pre-Coptic Egyptian. With a special attention to Late Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia 231. 229–69.Google Scholar