Article published In:
Vol. 39:5 (2022) ► pp.658706
Abbott, Barbara
1999Support for a unique theory of definite descriptions. In Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 91. 1–15. Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2008Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of definite descriptions in English. In Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 61–72. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abel, Fritz
1971L’adjectif démonstratif dans la langue de la Bible latine : Étude sur la formation des systèmes déictiques et de l’article défini des langues romanes. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Adams, James N. & Nigel Vincent
(eds.) 2016Early and late Latin: Continuity or change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aebischer, Paul
1948Contribution à la protohistoire des articles ille et ipse dans les langues romanes. Cultura Neolatina 81. 181–203.Google Scholar
Axenov, Serge
2006The Balochi language of Turkmenistan: A corpus-based grammatical description. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John F.
2012The syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldinger, Kurt
1968Post- und Prädeterminierung im Französischen. In Kurt Baldinger (ed.), Festschrift Walther von Wartburg zum 80. Geburtstag, 87–106. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena
2009Wakhi. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 825–858. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, Laura
2018Articles in the world’s languages. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Leipzig. [URL]
2019The crosslinguistic distribution and development of articles. Universität Bamberg. [URL]
Berger, Tilman
2007Tendencies of the evolution of a definite article in the Sorbian languages. Slavic Linguistic Society. [URL]
Bielenstein, August Johann Gottfried
1863Lettische Grammatik. Mitau: Fr. Lucas.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. & Gregory Ward
1994Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. In Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolby & Christopher Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93–102. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Pauline Harries & Nigel Vincent
2016Growing syntax: The development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92(1). e1–e37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Rolf H., Jr.
2009An introduction to old Frisian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter
2012The grammaticalization of an indefinite article in Slavic micro-languages. In Björn Wiemer (ed.), Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact, 275–322. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1988The diachronic dimension in explanation. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 350–379. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Language change and universals. In Ricardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic universals, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, Anne & Béatrice Lamiroy
2018The emergence of the grammatical paradigm of nominal determiners in French and in Romance: Comparative and diachronic perspectives. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63(2). 141–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, Anne & Walter de Mulder
2010The emergence of the definite article: ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. In Hubert Cuyckens, Lieven van de Lanotte & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Subjectifcation, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 241–275. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carling, Gerd
(ed.) 2019The Mouton atlas of languages and cultures: Europe and west, central, and south Asia, vol. 11. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, Chundra Aroor
2018Modeling linguistic evolution: A look under the hood. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1). 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, Chundra Aroor, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich R. Round
Cathcart, Chundra Aroor, Andreas Hölzl, Gerhard Jäger, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel
2020Numeral classifiers and number marking in Indo-Iranian. Language Dynamics and Change 11(2). 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandralal, Dileep
2010Sinhala. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Will, Chundra Aroor Cathcart, David P. Hall & Andrew J. Garrett
2015aAncestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91(1). 194–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015bAncestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis: Supplementary materials. Language 91(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christophersen, Paul
1939The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Clackson, James P. T.
2008Classical Armenian. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The ancient languages of Asia Minor, 124–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crisma, Paola
2011The emergence of the definite article in English: A contact-induced change? In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 175–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2011Understanding transition probabilities. Linguistic Typology 15(2). 415–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2003Definite articles in Scandinavian: Competing grammaticalization processes in standard and non-standard varieties. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology, 147–180. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013aDefinite articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
2013bIndefinite articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
2014Competing methods for uncovering linguistic diversity: The case of definite and indefinite articles (Commentary on Davis, Gillon and Matthewson). Language 90(4). 232–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dum-Tragut, Jasmine
2009Armenian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Tonya Kim Dewey, Carlee Arnett, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal
2017Dative sickness: A phylogenetic analysis of argument structure evolution in Germanic. Language 93(1). e1–e22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
2011Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 4731. 79–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H.
1971aReferenz, Sprachsituation und die bestimmten Artikel in einem nordfriesischen Dialekt, vol. 41. Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut.Google Scholar
1971bZwei Formen des bestimmten Artikels. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), Probleme und Fortschritte der Transformationsgrammatik: Referate des 4. Linguistischen Kolloquiums Berlin 6. bis 10. Oktober 1969, 159–174. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Edelman, Joy I. & Leila R. Dodykhudoeva
2009aThe Pamir languages. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 773–786. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009bShughni. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 787–824. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard
2002The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics 12(4). 333–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erschler, David
2019A new argument for existence of the DP in languages without articles. Journal of Linguistics 55(4). 879–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina
1996Pima Bajo. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2004The syntax of old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flick, Johanna
2019„Alte” Daten, neue Methoden. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10(1). 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Die Entwicklung des Definitartikels im Althochdeutschen. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. & Brian D. Joseph
2022The Balkan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fruyt, Michèle
2003Anaphore, cataphore et déixis dans l’Itinerarium d’Egérie. In Heikki Solin, Martti Leiwo & Hilla Halla-Aho (eds.), Latin vulgaire / latin tardif: Actes du vie colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Helsinki, 29 août-2 septembre 2000, vol. 61, 99–119. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Gair, James W.
2003Sinhala. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 766–817. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garland, Jennifer
2006Morphological typology and the complexity of nominal morphology in Sinhala. In Robert Englebretson & Carol Genetti (eds.), Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 171. 1–19. Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew J.
2012The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew J. Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2007The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19(4). 275–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilbertson, George Waters
1923The Balochi language: A grammar and manual. Hertford: Stephen Austin & Sons.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
2001The birth of a functional category: From Latin ille to the Romance article and personal pronoun. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in ltalian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 157–171. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana & Rossella Iovino
2016Latin as a split-DP language. Studia Linguistica 70(3). 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, David M.
2022The old Irish article. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 231. 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1978How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language 31. 47–82. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina
2012Parametric changes in the history of the Greek article. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew J. Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 179197. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The Greek definite article across time. Studies in Greek Linguistics 331. 76–91.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey L. J.
2016Deconstructing Iranian ergativity. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 465–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2018Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, 97–115. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1978Definiteness and indefniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1991On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal ofLinguistics 271. 405–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Hannah J. & Claire Bowern
2016Phylogenetic approach to the evolution of color term systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(48). 13666–13671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1998Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 741. 728–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1991Artikel und Definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung / An international handbook of contemporary research, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Definiteness and indefiniteness. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul H. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning 21. 996–1025. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2011The areal dimension of grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 291–301. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hertzenberg, Mari Johanne Bordal
2015Third person reference in Late Latin: Demonstratives, definite articles and personal pronouns in the Itinerarium Egeriae. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1997Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhna, Sebastian, Michael J. Landis & Tracy A. Heath
2017Phylogenetic inference using RevBayes. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 57(1). 6.16.1–6.16.34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhna, Sebastian, Michael J. Landis, Tracy A. Heath, Bastien Boussau, Nicolas Lartillot, Brian R. Moore, John P. Huelsenbeck & Fredrik Ronquist
2016Revbayes: Bayesian phylogenetic inference using graphical models and an interactive model-specification language. Systematic Biology 65(4). 726–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2018The syntax of Baltic. In Jared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph & Matthias A. Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics: An international handbook of language comparison and the linguistic reconstruction of Indo-European (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41) 31. 1668–1681. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C.
2010Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2nd edn. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Horst, Joop
2008Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Irslinger, Britta S.
2013Standard Average European and the western fringe: A reconsideration. Historische Sprachforschung 126(1). 33–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard
2019aComputational historical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 45 (3–4). 151–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019bModel evaluation in computational historical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 45(3–4). 299–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahani, Carina & Agnes Korn
2009Balochi. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 634–692. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasbi, Masoud
2016Three types of indefinites in Persian: Simple, complex, and antidefinite. In Mary Moroney, Carol-Rose Little, Jacob Collard & Dan Burgdorf (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at the University of Texas at Austin May 12–15, 2016, 244–263. Linguistic Society of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020The meaning of the Persian object marker : What it is not, and what it (probably) is. In Richard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi & Vida Samiian (eds.), Advances in Iranian linguistics, 119–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit
2001Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudolf Ernst
1978The German language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G.
1944The Old Persian relative and article. Language 201. 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2008Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 23–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jared S.
1996On personal deixis in classical Armenian: A study of the syntax and semantics of the n-, s-, and d-demonstratives in manuscripts E and M of the Old Armenian Gospels. Dettelbach: Röll.Google Scholar
Korn, Agnes & Maryam Nourzaei
2018“Those were the hungry years”: A glimpse of Coastal Afro-Balochi. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 28(4). 661–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovari, Geoffrey
1984Studien zum germanischen Artikel: Entstehung und Verwendung des Artikels im Gotischen. Wien: Halosar.Google Scholar
Kraiss, Andrew
2014The evolution of the definite article in Old High German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(2). 127–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurzová-Jedličkova, Helena
1963Die Demonstrativa im Vulgärlatein (4.–6. Jahrhundert). Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11(1–2). 121–143.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2nd edn. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1972Another look at drift. In Robert P. Stockwell & Ronald K. S. Macauley (eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory, 172–198. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Functional categories. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 761–771. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2007Covert patterns of definiteness/indefiniteness and aspectuality in Old Icelandic, Gothic and Old High German. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints and historical emergence, 73–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Simon J. Greenhill, Russell D. Gray & Michael Dunn
2011Universal typological dependencies should be detectable in the history of language families. Linguistic Typology 15(2). 509–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4). 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Definite associative anaphora. In Simon Botley, Julia Glass, Tony McEnery & Andrew Wilson (eds.), Approaches to discourse anaphora: Proceedings of DAARC96 – Discourse Anaphora and Resolution Colloquium, Lancaster University July 17th-18th 1996, Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William B.
1968Historical German syntax. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999Defniteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mallory, James P. & Douglas Q. Adams
2006The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manolessou, Io
2001The evolution of the demonstrative system in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 2(1). 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manolessou, Io & Geoffrey C. Horrocks
2007The development of the definite article in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 271. 224–236.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1986Definiteness marking in South Asian languages. In Bhadriraju Krishnamurti (ed.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence and diglossia, 123–146. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
1991The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje
1997A short grammar of Latvian. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2002Romani. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matzinger, Joachim
2006Der altalbanische Text Mbsuame e krështerë (Dottrina cristiana) des Lekë Matrënga von 1592: Eine Einführung in die albanische Sprachwissenschaft. Dettelbach: J. H. Röll.Google Scholar
Maþiulis, Vytautas
n.d. Historical grammar of Old Prussian. [URL]
McColl Millar, Robert
2000Some suggestions for explaining the origin and development of the definite article in English: Grammaticalization in English. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change, 275–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. Gary
2018The Oxford Gothic grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A.
1969Determination. In Working Papers in Language Universals 11. 63–98. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
de Mulder, Walter & Anne Carlier
2011The grammaticalization of definite articles. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 522–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müth, Angelika
2011Categories of definiteness in Classical Armenian. In Erik Welo (ed.), Indo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches, 11–25. Oslo: University of Oslo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Maria
2009Aspects of definiteness in Greek. Studies in Language 33(3). 569–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Functions of the definite article from classical Greek to New Testament Greek. In Daniel King (ed.), The article in post-Classical Greek, 15–55. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2003Diversity and stability in language. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 283–310. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nocentini, Alberto
1990L’uso dei dimostrativi nella Peregrinatio Egeriae e la genesi dell’articolo romanzo. In Alberto Fatucchi (ed.), Atti del convegno internazionale sulla Peregrinatio Egeriae, 137–158. Arezzo: Accademia Petrarca.Google Scholar
Pagel, Mark
1994Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 255(1342). 37–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Mark & Andrew Meade
2006Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The American Naturalist 167(6). 808–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paliga, Sorin
2019The definite article as a reference point in defining the Balkansprachbund . In Valeriu Sîrbu, Alexandra Comsa & Dumitru Hortopan (eds.), Digging in the past of Old Europe: Studies in honor of Christian Schuster at his 60th anniversary, TârguJiu: Editura Istros a Muzeului Brăilei “Carol I”.Google Scholar
Paranavitana, Senarath
1956Sigiri graffiti: Being Sinhalese verses of the eighth, ninth and tenth centuries, vol. 11. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Ludwig
1998Zazaki: Grammatik und Versuch einer Dialektologie. Reichert.Google Scholar
2009Zazaki. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 545–586. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2007The universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica 61(1). 59–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, John R.
2005A Tajik Persian reference grammar. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pimenova, Natalie
2017Дистрибуция протоартиклевого sa ‘этот, тот’ и jains ‘тот’ на ранней стадии грамматикализации готского артикля. In Nikolai N. Kazansky (ed.), Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология [Indo-European linguistics and classical philology] 211. 661–671. Санкт-Петербург: Наука.Google Scholar
Prauliņš, Dace
2012Latvian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2017Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis? Language 93(2). 381–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald A.
2017A linguistic history of English: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, vol.11. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2nd edn. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1905On denoting. Mind 141. 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SanGregory, Erin
2018Differential subject marking in Wakhi. Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics MA thesis.
Sauvageot, Aurelien
1929L’emploi de l’article en gotique. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Schaarschmidt, Gunter
1984Theme-rheme structure and the article in Sorbian. In Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria 411. 75–90. Victoria: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Stefan
2009Lehnbeziehungen zwischen Protoalbanisch und balkanischem Latein bzw. Romanisch. In Oliver Jens Schmitt & Eva Anne Frantz (eds.), Albanische Geschichte: Stand und Perspektiven der Forschung, 37–60. München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2013Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(10). 534–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1936Die nominale Determination in den indogermanischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 63(3/4). 145–167.Google Scholar
Selig, Maria
1992Die Entwicklung der Nominaldetermination im Spätlatein: Romanischer Sprachwandel und lateinische Schriftlichkeit. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
2012Investigating the emergence of the definite article in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica 461. 175–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The influence of constructions in grammaticalization: Revisiting category emergence and the development of the definite article in English. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Spike Gildea, Elena Smirnova & Lotte Sommerer (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata
2011Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Todd, Terry Lynn
2008A grammar of Dimili: Also known as Zaza. Kandern: Forum Linguistik 3rd edn.Google Scholar
Trager, George L.
1932The use of the Latin demonstratives (especially ille and ipse) up to 600 ad, as the source of the Romance article. New York: Publications of the Institute of French Studies.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2010The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48(2). 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & Joop van der Horst
2013Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences 361. 66–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de la Villa Polo, Jesús
2011Numerals. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax: Quantification, numerals, possession, anaphora 31. 175–238. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1997The emergence of the D-system in Romance. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 149–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1999The evolution of C-structure: Prepositions and PPs from Indo-European to Romance. Linguistics 371. 1111–1153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Definiteness in diachrony: Romance vs. Germanic. Specificity, definiteness and article systems across languages, 40th Annual Meeting of the DGfS.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi, Omkar Nath Koul & Omakāra Aina Kaula
1997Kashmiri: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Ulrich
1980,Post-‘ oder ,Prädetermination‘ in den romanischen Sprachen? Romanistisches Jahrbuch 311. 56–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wemke, Matthias, Kathrin Kunkel-Razum & Werner Scholze-Stubenrecht
(eds.) 1995Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag 8th edn.Google Scholar
Wendtland, Antje
2011Die Entwicklung von Demonstrativpronomina zu Artikeln im Soghdischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Paul
2018Indogermanische Stammbäume: Datentypen, Methoden. In Elisabeth Rieken, Ulrich Geupel & Theresa Maria Roth (eds.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: Morphosyntaktische Kategorien in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 23. September 2015 in Marburg, 373–388. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna L.
2003Definiteness and number: Determiner phrase and number phrase in the history of English PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.