Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:1 (2022) ► pp.88127
References
Akatsuka, Noriko
1992Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko & Patricia M. Clancy
1993Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean. In Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 21, 177–192. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Anderl, Christoph
2004Studies in the language of Zu-tang ji. PhD dissertation, The University of Oslo.
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander
2017The myth of the complete sentence – a response to Traugott. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 311–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biq, Yung-O.
1988From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: Cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16(1). 72–108.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2010Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper
(eds.) 1989Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent
2011Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968A grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss
1997Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Akio Kamio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2010Category change in English with and without structural change. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Ambiguity and vagueness in historical change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Why would anyone take long? Word classes and Construction Grammar in the history of long . In Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective, 119–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2019The grammar network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eifring, Halvor
1995Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nicholaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
(eds.) 2016Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fintel, Kai von
1991Exceptive conditionals: The meaning of unless . North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 221. 135–148.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2018Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and constructionalization. In Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds.), New trends in grammaticalization and language change, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Bill Jirsa
2006The principle of indirect means in language use and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics 381. 513–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko
2004Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 121–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
2010The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten
2011Grammaticalization and Construction Grammar. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
He, Leshi, Jinghao Ao, Kezhong Wang, Meiqiao, Mai & Haifen Wang
(eds.) 1985 Gǔdài hànyǔ xūcí tōng shì [A dictionary of function words in Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Herforth, Derek
1994Conditional sentences in Old Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Hong, Bo & Dong Zhengcun
2004 “Fēi X bùkě” géshì de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the expression “fei X bu ke ”]. Zhongguo Yuwen 31. 253–261.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren & Keh-Jiann Chen
1998Zhōngyāng yán jiù yuàn hàn yǔliàokù de nèiróng yǔ shuōmíng [Sinica Corpus User Manual], [URL] (18 February 2021)
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds.), Outside the clause, 341–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawalya, Deo, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen
2018From conditionality to modality in Luganda (Bantu, JE15): A synchronic and diachronic corpus analysis of the verbal prefix -andi-. Journal of Pragmatics 1271. 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020aLate-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22(2).
Lehmann, Christian
1995 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1976Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Ming
2016 Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu [A study of the historical development of Chinese auxiliary verbs]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi
2004Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansó
2011How directive constructions emerge: grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3489–3521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Insubordination in Japanese diachronically. In Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), Insubordination, 247–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
2016Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Exaptation, 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo
1958Chugokugo Rekishi Bunpō [A historical grammar of Modern Chinese]. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter
2019How constructions are born. The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept, 157–192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1995Outline of Classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Rentzsch, Julian
2012Scope hierarchies and modality in Manchu. Studies in Language 36(4). 848–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1989Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(6). 683–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1979Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2015When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 471. 215–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2003A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker & Sebastian Kaiser
2019When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). In Karin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), Insubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues, 320–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen
1996Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanno, Koji
2017Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte . Language Sciences 641. 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, Tiago Timponi
2015On the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and the construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1985Conditional markers. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Unless and but conditionals. In Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On conditionals again, 145–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017aLow salience as an enabling factor in morphosyntactic change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English Language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 93–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bInsubordination in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language & Linguistics 21(2). 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Rethinking the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of interactional texts. Open Linguistics 41. 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2014On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde
2013Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 361. 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David
1993Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4(3). 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017Imperatives and directive strategies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2001Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(10). 1505–1528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Canlong
2008 “Fēi VP bùkě” jù shì zhōng “bùkě” de yǐnxiàn: Jiān tán “fēi” de xū huà [On the occurrence and non-occurrence of buke (不可) and the grammaticalization of fei (非) in the construction “fei + VP + buke ”]. Zhongguo Yuwen 21. 109–119.Google Scholar
Wen, Zhengxing
2010Táng sòng “shǐ dé” jù de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the “shide” (始得) sentence in the Tang and Song Dynasties]. Yǔwén Yánjiū 116(3). 45–52.Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jeroen
2015A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Hsueh-ju
2018 Xiānqín qíngtài dòngcí yánjiū [A Study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese]. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.Google Scholar
Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cídiǎn
, 7th edn. 2016 Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Fan-Pei
2007A cognitive approach to Mandarin conditionals. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2015The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39(2). 459–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar