Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 21:1 (2004) ► pp.208213
References
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
2001Review of Essays in Hispanic Linguistics Dedicated to Paul M. Lloyd ed. by Robert J. Blake, Diana L. Ranson & Roger Wright. Newark, Del.: Juan de la Cuesta. Romance Philology 541.499–505.Google Scholar
Craddock, Jerry R.
1969Latin Legacy Versus Substratum Residue: The unstressed “derivational” suffixes in the Romance vernaculars of the western Mediterranean.(= University of California Publications in Linguistics , 531.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cravens, Thomas D.
2000 “Romance Lenition”. New Approaches to Old Problems: Issues in Romance historical linguistics ed. by Steven N. Dworkin & Dieter Wanner, 47–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figge, Udo
1966 Die romanische Anlaut Sonorisation . (= Romanistische Versuche und Vorarbeiten , 191.) Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
1997L’origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico: Saggio di fonologia diacronica romanza. (= Romanica Helvetica , 1151.) Basle & Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
2003 “Due note sul raddoppiamento fonosintattico: 1. L’iberoromanzo in fase antica, 2. Fiorent. tu ”. Romance Philology 561.307–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón
1954 “A propósito de l y ll latinas: Colonización suditálica en España”. Boletín de la Real Academia Española 341.165–216.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter
2003 “Romance Linguistics is Alive and Well”. La corónica 311.103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wireback, Kenneth J.
1997The Role of Phonological Structure in Sound Change from Latin to Spanish and Portuguese. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1999 “The Relationship between Lenition, the Strong Word Boundary, and Sonorant Lengthening in Ibero-Romance”. Essays in Hispanic Linguistics Dedicated to Paul M. Lloyd ed. by Robert J. Blake, Diana L. Ranson and Roger Wright, 155–172. Newark, Del.: Juan de la Cuesta.Google Scholar