Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 40:2 (2023) ► pp.153194
References (62)
References
Amaral, Patrícia. 2016. When something becomes a bit . Diachronica 33(2). 151–186.Google Scholar
Boleda, Gemma. 2020. Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 61. 13.1–13.22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boleda, Gemma & Aurélie Herbelot. 2016. Formal distributional semantics: Introduction to the special issue. Computational Linguistics 619–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bréal, Michel. 1897. Essai de semantique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 3rd edn.Google Scholar
Cardellino, Cristian. 2019. Spanish billion words corpus and embeddings. [URL]
Church, Kenneth Ward & Patrick Hanks. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16(1). 22–29. [URL]
Clark, Stephen. 2015. Vector space models of lexical meaning. In Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 493–522. London: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Ashwini Deo. 2014. Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan and trajectories of semantic change. In Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, 261–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corominas, Joan & José A. Pascual. 1980–1991. Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Gredos.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2001. Corpus del Español. [URL]
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2017. Introduction: On ‘additivity’ as a multidisciplinary research field. In Anna-Maria De Cesare & Cecilia Andorno (eds.), Focus on additivity, 1–22. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2015. Diachronic semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics 11. 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubossarsky, Haim, Simon Hengchen, Nina Tahmasebi & Dominik Schlechtweg. 2019. Time-out: Temporal referencing for robust modeling of lexical semantic change. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 457–470. Florence, Italy. [URL]. DOI logo
Eberenz, Rolf. 1994. Enlaces conjuntivos y adjuntos de sentido aditivo del español preclásico: otrosí, eso mismo, asimismo, demás, también, aun, etc. Iberoromania 391. 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization. An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinoza Elorza, Rosa María. 2018. La formación de los marcadores sumativos en español. desde sobresto hasta a mayores . Estudios Humanísticos Filología 401. 95–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Ines. 2016. De más (demás), demasiado: la historia de dos cuantificadores contemplada desde la dialectología. In López Serena, A. and Narbona Jiménez, A. and del Rey Quesada, S. (ed.), El Español a través del tiempo. Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar, 477–496. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Lev, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman & Eytan Ruppin. 2001. Placing search in context: The concept revisited. In Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, 406–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frermann, Lea & Mirella Lapata. 2016. A Bayesian model of diachronic meaning change. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 41. 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gago Jover, Francisco (ed.). 2011. Spanish Chronicle Texts. Digital Library of Old Spanish Texts. Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies. [URL]
Gergel, Remus & Jonathan Watkins (eds.). 2020. Quantification and scales in change. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
GITHE, Universidad de Alcalá. 2015. Corpus de Documentos Españoles Anteriores a 1800. [URL]
Giulianelli, Mario, Marco Del Tredici & Raquel Fernández. 2020. Analysing lexical semantic change with contextualised word representations. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3960–3973. Online. DOI logo. [URL]
Golub, Gene H. & Christian Reinsch. 1971. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. In F. L. Bauer, A. S. Householder, F. W. J. Olver, H. Rutishauser, K. Samelson & E. Stiefel (eds.), Handbook for automatic computation, 134–151. Springer. Volume II1: Linear Algebra. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, William L., Jure Leskovec & Dan Jurafsky. 2016. Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1489–1501. Berlin, Germany. DOI logo. [URL]
Harris, Zellig. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10(2–3). 146–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellrich, Johannes. 2019. Word embeddings: Reliability and semantic change: Jena University Language and Information Engineering Lab dissertation.
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Hai, Patrícia Amaral & Sandra Kübler. 2021. Word embeddings and semantic shifts in historical Spanish: Methodological considerations. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37,(2). 441–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Renfen, Shen Li & Shichen Liang. 2019. Diachronic sense modeling with deep contextualized word embeddings: An ecological view. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3899–3908. Florence, Italy. DOI logo. [URL]
Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin. 2019. Speech and Language Processing. 3rd edn. Online at [URL]; retrieved April 2020.
Keniston, Hayward. 1937. The syntax of Castilian prose: The sixteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kutuzov, Andrey, Lilja Øvrelid, Terrence Szymanski & Erik Velldal. 2018. Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: A survey. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1384–1397.Google Scholar
Landauer, Thomas, Peter Folz & Darrell Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processing 25(2&3). 259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro. 2018. Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics 4(1). 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, Omer, Yoav Goldberg & Ido Dagan. 2015. Improving distributional similarity with lessons learned from word embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 31. 211–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yiwei, Dan Jurafsky & Beth Levin. 2019. From insanely jealous to insanely delicious: Computational models for the semantic bleaching of English intensifiers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change, 1–13. Florence, Italy. [URL]. DOI logo
van der Maaten, Laurens & Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 91. 2579–2605.Google Scholar
Mikolov, Thomas, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado & Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant reading. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Müller, Bodo. 1987. Diccionario del español medieval. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Pennington, Jeffrey, Richard Socher & Christopher D. Manning. 2014. GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing EMNLP, 1532–1543. Doha, Qatar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Sali Tagliamonte. 2000. The grammaticization of going to in African American English. Language Variation and Change 111. 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. n.a. Corpus Diacrónico del Español. [URL]
Rodda, Martina, Marco Senaldi & Alessandro Lenci. 2017. Panta Rei: Tracking semantic change with distributional semantics in Ancient Greek. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 3(1). 11–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María. 2001. Observaciones sobre el uso de los adjetivos y los adverbios en -mente con valor de grado en español. Español Actual 751. 33–43.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Alex & Katrin Erk. 2018. Deep neural models of semantic shift. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 474–484. New Orleans, Louisiana. DOI logo. [URL]
Sagi, Eyal, Stefan Kaufmann & Brady Clark. 2012. Tracing semantic change with Latent Semantic Analysis. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 161–183. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 1999. Los cuantificadores: Clases de cuantificadores y estructuras cuantificativas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 11, cap.16. Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Martínez, Felipe, Isabel Martínez-Sempere, Xavier Ivars-Ribes & Rafael C. Carrasco. 2013. An open diachronic corpus of historical Spanish. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(4). 1327–1342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli & Penka Stateva. 2007. Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. In Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference (SALT), 228–245. University of Connecticut. [URL]. DOI logo
Stern, Gustaf. 1921. Swift, swiftly, and their synonyms. A contribution to semantic analysis and theory. Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerber.Google Scholar
Tang, Xuri. 2018. A state-of-the-art of semantic change computation. Natural Language Engineering 24(5). 649–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2012. Grammaticalization through inherent variability. Studies in Language 36(1). 73–122. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yang & Charles Kemp. 2015. A computational evaluation of two laws of semantic change. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2703–2708.Google Scholar