Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 40:1 (2023) ► pp.73–110

On the origins of multiple exponence in Crow

ORCID logo | University of California, BerkeleyBerkeley
Multiple exponence is a phenomenon in which morphemes that encode a given piece of information are realized multiple times within a single word. Unlike other members of the Siouan language family spoken across North America, Crow possesses a set of modal auxiliaries that display multiple exponence of subject person agreement. I show that one source of multiple exponence in Crow is the grammaticalization of the inflectional future from the motion verb arrive there, which brings with it its own agreement prefixes. Multiple exponence then extended to compound modals containing the inflectional future and finally to a morphologically unrelated modal – a distinct case of multiple exponence begetting additional multiple exponence. Thus, this study contributes to the broader understanding of the diachronic pathways to multiple exponence.
Keywords: Crow, Siouan, multiple exponence, futurity, modality, grammaticalization, analogical extension
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multiple exponence in Crow
  • 3.The inflectional future -ii ‘will, must’
  • 4.The modal auxiliaries -iimmaachi ‘will, must’, -iih ‘may, might’, and -iishdaachi ‘should’
  • 5.The involuntary desiderative -isshi ‘feel like’
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 8 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22003.ko
References (68)
References
Alden, Arthur, Felice Big Day, Morton Big Medicine, Eugene Deputy, Cyle Old Elk, Alma Real Bird, Birdie Real Bird, Jack Real Bird, Theresa Sends Part Home, Riley Singer, Lewis Walks Over Ice, Charles Yarlott Jr., Roberta Yarlott & Edwin Ko. n.d. Crow (Apsáalooke) Field Materials, 2018–17. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley, DOI logo
Aski, Janice M. 1995. Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go . Linguistics 33(3). 403–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Jonah. 2021. Towards a typology of change in person marking reference. Folia Linguistica 55(s42–s1). 87–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilingual Materials Development Center (ed.). 1980a. Balashe Harold huuk [My name is Harold]. Crow Agency, MT: Bilingual Materials Development Center.Google Scholar
. 1980b. Bitaalasshia Alitchiasshiituualak Bahaa Awuuasshiituualak. Crow Agency, MT: Bilingual Materials Development Center.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent. 2011. The pre-conditions for suppletion. In George Tsoulas, Glyn Hicks & Alexandra Galani (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 239–265. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2015. Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Boyle, John. 2020. A new look at the Hidatsa obstruent system. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Siouan and Caddoan Languages Conference , Berkeley, CA, May 21, 2020.
Boyle, John P. 2007. Hidatsa morpho-syntax and clause structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago dissertation.
Brody, Parker L. 2019. Morphological exceptionality and pathways of change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(3). 315–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages: A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bulltail, George. 1980. Baapiiháake awákaak [I saw the last day]. Pryor, MT: Crow Bible Translation Committee.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Dale Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world, vol. 1961. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela & Alice C. Harris. 2012. A working typology of multiple exponence. In Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi & Péter Siptár (eds.), Current issues in morphological theory: (Ir)regularity, analogy and frequency, 163–188. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, George Tucker, Jeff Good & Alice Mitchell. 2014. Beyond the ancestral code: Towards a model for sociolinguistic language documentation. Language Documentation & Conservation 81. 168–91.Google Scholar
Ciucci, Luca. 2021. How to restructure a grammatical category: The innovative person system of Chamacoco (Zamucoan, northern Paraguay). Folia Linguistica 55(s42–s1). 111–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Willem J. 2006. Serial verbs in Lakota (Siouan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 301–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fertig, David. 1998. Suppletion, natural morphology, and diagrammaticity. Linguistics 36(6) 1065–1091. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Florey, Margaret. 2004. Countering purism: Confronting the emergence of new varieties in a training program for community language workers. Language Documentation and Description 21. 9–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 124–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graczyk, Randolph. 2007. A grammar of Crow. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2008. Explaining exuberant agreement. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Linguistic theory and grammatical change: The Rosendal papers, 265–283. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Multiple exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Andrei Antonenko. 2011. Language contact and the origins of multiple exponence in Archi pronouns. In Vittorio S. Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianow-icz (eds.), Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus: Papers from the International Conference “Current Advances in Caucasian Studies” Macerata, January 21–23, 2010, 223–243. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2006. Trapped morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(2). 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Arthur G. Samuel. 2011. Perception of exuberant exponence in Batsbi: Functional or incidental? Language, 87(3). 447–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, James & Morris Halle. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2). 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31(2).279–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The growth of affixes in morphological reanalysis. Yearbook of Morphology 1994 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 51(s1000). 31–80.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes & Christian Lehmann. 2008. Hocank’s challenge to morphological theory. In K. David Harrison, David Rood & Arienne Dwyer (eds.), Lessons from documented endangered languages, 217–316. Amsterdam & Philadelpia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollow, Robert C. 1973. Mandan texts. Box 3: Robert C. Hollow materials. (A set of 22 texts recorded, transcribed, and translated by Robert C. Hollow held at the North Dakota State Historical Society.).Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Wesley. n.d. On Proto-Siouan Ablaut and Nasalization: A Note to Follow David S. Rood’s Paper. Siouan Archive.
Joseph, Brian D. 2016. Multiple exponence in language contact situations: A case study from the Greek of southern Albania. In Angela Ralli (ed.), Contact morphology, 211–224. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Juge, Matthew L. 1999. On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms. In Jeffrey Good & Alan Yu (eds.), Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 2511, 183–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Analogy as a source of suppletion. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Historical linguistics. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. The sense that suppletion makes: Towards a semantic typology on diachronic principles. Transactions of the Philological Society 117(3). 390–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abby. 2015. The evidence for homophony avoidance in language change. Diachronica 32(2). 268–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasak, Ryan. 2019. Affix ordering and templatic morphology in Mandan. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.
Khvtisiashvili, Tamrika. 2013. Principal aspects of Xinaliq phonology and morphosyntax. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah dissertation.
Ko, Edwin. 2019. Active-stative agreement in Crow. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas , Davis, CA, July 13, 2019.
. 2020. Unaccusativity in Crow. In Ryan Kasak, Samiron Dutta & Justin McBride (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Siouan and Caddoan Languages Conference, 83–101.Google Scholar
. 2021. Feeding agreement: Anti-locality in Crow applicatives of unaccusatives. In Alessa Farinella & Angelica Hill (eds.), Proceedings of the 51th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 21, 39–52.Google Scholar
Ko, Edwin & Schuyler Laparle. 2022. Co-speech gesture and semantic fieldwork: A case study of aspectuals in Crow. Semantic Fieldwork Methods 4(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1945. La nature des procès dits «analogiques». Acta Linguistica 5(1). 15–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowie, Robert. 1939. Hidatsa texts (with grammatical notes and phonograph transcriptions by Zellig Harris and CF Voegelin). Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Historical Society.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2004. When lexemes become allomorphs – on the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica 38(3–4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsault, Julie. 2021. Valency-changing operations in Umónhon: Affixation, incorporation, and syntactic constructions. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle dissertation.
Martin, Jack B. 1989. Underlying Nasals in Crow, Hidatsa and Proto-Missouri River (Siouan). In Jong-seok Ok & Mubeccel Taneri (eds.), Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 1421, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Old Coyote, Henry. 1985. Uuwatisee [Big Metal]. Crow Agency, MT: Bilingual Materials Development Center.Google Scholar
Park, Indrek. 2012. A grammar of Hidatsa. Bloomingon, IN: Indiana University Bloomington dissertation.
Parks, Douglas, Jones A. Wesley & Robert Hollow. 1978. Earth lodge tales from the Upper Missouri: Traditional stories of the Arikara, Hidatsa, and Mandan. Bismarck, ND: Mary College.Google Scholar
Quintero, Carolyn. 2004. Osage grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L. 1996. Nouns to pronouns: The Siouan 1st dual and 3rd plural. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the Americas Winter Meeting , San Diego, CA.
Rankin, Robert L., Richard T. Carter, A. Wesley Jones, John E. Koontz, David S. Rood & Iren Hartmann (eds.). 2015. Comparative Siouan dictionary. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2013. A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 30(4). 579–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallman, Adam J R. 2020. Beyond grammatical and phonological words. Language and Linguistics Compass 14(2). e12364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2005. From habituals to futures: Discerning the path of diachronic development. In Angeliek van Hout, Henriëtte de Swart & Henk J. Verkuyl (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 181–197. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Allan R. 1976. On verbs of motion in Siouan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 42(4). 287–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, Jan F. & Ben Black Bear. 2018. Lakota grammar handbook: A pedagogically oriented self-study reference and practice book for beginner to upper intermediate students, with an answer key. Bloomington, IN: Lakota Language Consortium.Google Scholar
Walking Bear, Marlene. 1985. Bacheewaatcháachish [Outstanding man]. Crow Agency, MT: Bilingual Materials Development Center.Google Scholar
Wallace, Karen Kay. 1993. Verb incorporation and agreement in Crow. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
Wolff, Hans. 1950. Comparative Siouan II. International Journal of American Linguistics 16(3). 113–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English N’T. Language 59(3). 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar