Article published In:
Diachronica: Online-First Articles

On the dating of sound changes and its implications for language relationship

The case of Proto-Yeniseian *p- > Ket h-, Yugh f-

ORCID logo | University of Cologne
ORCID logo | University of Würzburg

This article seeks to demonstrate how the synopsis of historiographical and lexicographical material allows for the absolute dating of sound changes even in languages with late and imperfect documentation, and how this dating relates to hypotheses concerning the long-range genealogical affiliation of these languages. The languages investigated are Ket and Yugh which belong to the Yeniseian family and have been documented since the 18th century. Two sound changes in these languages will be discussed: Proto-Yeniseian *p- > Ket h-, and Proto-Yeniseian *p- > Yugh f-. It will be argued that the Ket development occurred between 1596/1607 and 1723 AD, and that the Yugh development occurred between 1739 and 1846/1847 AD. The implications of these findings for the Dene-Yeniseian hypothesis linking the Yeniseian family with the Na-Dene family will be discussed. It will be argued that this hypothesis cannot be maintained, and that short-range comparisons are preferable to long-range speculations.

Keywords: Comparative Method, long-range comparison, language relationship, Yeniseian, Na-Dene, Dene-Yeniseian, sound change, dating, chronology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The dating of PY *p- > Ket h- and PY *p- > Yugh f-
    • 2.1The reflex of PY *p- in the Yeniseian languages
    • 2.2The dating of PY *p- > Ket h-
    • 2.3The dating of PY *p- > Yugh f-
  • 3.The phoneme *p in long-range comparisons with the Yeniseian languages
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations/glossary
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 30 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23030.fri
References
Bonmann, Svenja, Simon Fries, Natalie Korobzow, Laura Günther & Eugen Hill
2023 Towards a new reconstruction of the Proto-Yeniseian sound system. Part I: Word-initial consonants. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 5(1). 39–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouda, Karl
1957 Die Sprache der Jenissejer: Genealogische und morphologische Untersuchungen. Anthropos 521. 65–134.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm
1874 Zur Kenntnis des Fränkischen und zur hochdeutschen Lautverschiebung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 11. 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm and Frank Heidermanns
2018 Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büsching, Anton
1785 Beyträge zu der Lebensgeschichte denkwürdiger Personen, vol. 31. Halle, Germany: Curt.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2011 The Dene-Yeniseian connection (review). International Journal of American Linguistics 77(3). 445–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castrén, Matthias
1856 Reiseberichte und Briefe aus den Jahren 1845 – 1848. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1858 Versuch einer jenissei-ostjakischen und kottischen Sprachlehre, nebst Wörterverzeichnissen aus den genannten Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Dolgix, Boris
1960 Rodovoj i plemennoj sostav narodov Sibiri v XVII v [Ethnic and tribal composition of the peoples of XVIIth century Siberia]. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Dulson, Andreas [Dul’zon, A.
] 1959a Geografičeskie nazvanija Zapadnoj Sibiri kak istočnik eë drevnej istorii [Toponyms of Western Siberia as a source on its ancient history]. In Nekotorye voprosy drevnej istorii Zapadnoj Sibiri. Tomsk: Tomskij oblastnoj kraevedčeskij muzej. 24–28.Google Scholar
] 1959b Ketskije toponimy Zapadnoj Sibiri [Ket toponyms of Southern Siberia]. Učenye zapiski Tomskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta 181. 91–111.Google Scholar
] 1961 Slovarnye materialy XVIII v. po enisejskim narečijam [XVIIIth century dictionary materials on Yeniseian languages]. Učenye zapiski Tomskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta 19(2). 152–189.Google Scholar
] 1964 Očerki po grammatike ketskogo jazyka [A grammar sketch of the Ket language], vol. 11. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.Google Scholar
] 1966 Ketskie skazki [Ket fairytales]. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.Google Scholar
] 1968 Ketskij jazyk [The Ket language]. Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.Google Scholar
] 1970 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri 31. 81–121.Google Scholar
] 1971 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri 41. 119–157.Google Scholar
] 1972 Materialy po ketskoj dialektologii [Materials on Ket dialectology]. Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri 51. 104–145.Google Scholar
Ėlert, Aleksandr
1990 Ėkspedicionnye materialy G. F. Millera kak istočnik po istorii Sibiri [Expedition materials of G. F. Müller as a source on the history of Siberia]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Fries, Simon & Svenja Bonmann
2023 The development of Arin kul ‘water’ ~ Kott ûl, Ket ¹u·l’, Yugh ¹ur and its typological background. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 5(2). 183–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georg, Stefan
2007 A descriptive grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak) I. Introduction, phonology, morphology. Kent: Global Oriental. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helimski, Eugen [Xelimskij, E.
] 1982 Keto-Uralica. In E. Alekseenko (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, ėtnografija, mifologija, lingvistika, 238–250. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
] 1986 Arxivnye materialy XVIII v. po enisejskim jazykam [XVIIIth century archival materials on Yeniseian languages]. In P. Skorik (ed.), Paleo-aziatskie jazyki, 179–213. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen
1997 Die matorische Sprache. Wörterverzeichnis, Grundzüge der Grammatik, Sprachgeschichte. Szeged: [n. p.].Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen [Xelimskij, E.
] 2000 Komparativisika, uralistika. Lekcii i stat’i [Comparative studies, Uralic studies. Lectures and papers]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen
2008 Lautgesetze und Dialektvariation in den Jenissej-Sprachen: Entwicklung der Labiale im Ketischen und Jugischen. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher 221. 60–93.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth
1953 Language and history in early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, 1st to 12th c. A.D. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1977 Samojedischer Wortschatz. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Google Scholar
Khabtagaeva, Bayarma
2019 Language contact in Siberia: Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic loanwords in Yeniseian. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A.
1993 Transitivity increase in Athabaskan languages. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity ( Studies in Language Comparison Series 23), 47–68. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Transitivity decrease in Navajo and Athabaskan: Actor-affecting propositional derivations. In Eloise Jelinek, Sally Midgette, Keren Rice, & Leslie Saxon (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, 259–304. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
2010 Transitivity indicators, historical scenarios, and sundry Dene-Yeniseian notes. In James Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection ( Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 319–322. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kim, Ronald
1999 Observations on the absolute and relative chronology of Tocharian loanwords and sound changes. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies 81. 111–138.Google Scholar
Kotorova, Elizaveta & Andrej Nefedov
2015 Comprehensive dictionary of Ket with Russian, German, and English translations. 21 vols. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael E.
1964 Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene I: The phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 30(2). 118–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965 Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene II: Morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 31(1). 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Michael E. & Jeff Leer
1981 Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit sonorants (Alaska Native Language Center research papers 5). Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin
2007 Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff
1996 Comparative Athabaskan lexicon. Item CA965L1996a. Ms., Alaska Native Language Archive. Online: [URL] (Accessed on 18.06.2023).
2010 The palatal series in Athabascan-Eyak-Tlingit, with an overview of the basic correspondences. In James Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 168–193. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Maloletko, Aleksej
1992 Paleotoponimika [Paleotoponymics]. Tomsk: Tomskij gos. universitet.Google Scholar
2000 Drevnije narody Sibiri II. Kety. [Ancient peoples of Siberia II. Kets.] Tomsk: Tomskij universitet.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, Daniel
1964 Forschungsreise durch Sibirien 1720 – 1727 II. Tagebuchaufzeichnungen Januar 1723 – Mai 1724. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mikola, Tobor
1995 Morphologisches Wörterbuch des Enzischen. Szeged, Hungary: Attila József University.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
] 1750 Opisanie Sibirskago carstva [A description of the Siberian realm ruled by the tsar]. St. Petersburg: Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
1760 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 3/5–6. Nachrichten von der Handlung in Sibirien. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1762 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 6/6. Sibirische Geschichte 5. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1763 Sammlung Rußischer Geschichte 8/1. Sibirische Geschichte 6. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
] 1937–2005 Istorija Sibiri [History of Siberia]. 31 vols. Moscow/Leningrad: Akademija Nauk/Vostočnaja literatura.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
2003 Nachrichten über Völker Sibiriens (1736–1742). Ed. by Eugen Helimski & Hartmut Katz. Hamburg: Institut für Finnougristik/Uralistik der Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich [Miller, G.
] 2009 Opisanie sibirskix narodov [A description of the Siberian peoples]. Moskva: Pamjatniki Istoričeskoj mysli.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich
2010–2018 Ethnographische Schriften. 21 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
2000 Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt
1998 The origin of the Na-Dene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 951. 13994–13996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seebold, Elmar
2009 Chronologisches Wörterbuch des deutschen Wortschatzes II. Der Wortschatz des 9. Jahrhunderts. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siegel, Florian
2013 Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
Starostin, George
2010 Dene-Yeniseian and Dene-Caucasian: Pronouns and other thoughts. In Siri Tuttle & Justin Spence (eds.), Working papers in Dene languages 81, 107–117. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
2012 Dene-Yeniseian: A critical assessment. Journal of Linguistic Relationship 81. 117–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starostin, Sergej
1982 Praenisejskaja rekonstrukcija i vnešnie svjazi enisejskix jazykov [Proto-Yeniseian reconstruction and outer relationships of the Yeniseian languages]. In E. Alekseenko (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, ėtnografija, mifologija, lingvistika, 144–237. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
1983 Gipoteza o genetičeskix svjazjax sinotibetskix jazykov s enisejskimi i severokavkazskimi jazykami [A hypothesis concerning the genetic relationship of Sino-Tibetan languages with Yeniseian and Northern Caucasian languages]. In I. F. Vardu (ed.), Lingvističeskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejšaja istorija Vostoka, 19–38. Moscow: Akademija nauk, Institut vostokovedenija.Google Scholar
1995 Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ enisejskix jazykov [A comparative dictionary of Yeniseian languages]. In S. Starostin (ed.), Ketskij sbornik. Lingvistika, 176–315. Moskva: Vostočnaja literatura.Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward
2000 Ket prosodic phonology. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2004 Ket. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2009 Loanwords in Ket. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook, 471–497. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 A Siberian link with Na-Dene languages. In James Kari & Ben A. Potter (eds.), The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska: New series 5(1/2), a special joint publication of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks), 33–99. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
2018 Dene-Yeniseian: Progress and unanswered questions. Diachronica 35(2). 277–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 The Dene-Yeniseian Hypothesis. In Michael Fortescue & Edward Vajda, Mid-Holocene language connections between Asia and North America, 235–480. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward & Heinrich Werner
2022 Comparative-historical Yeniseian dictionary. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2019 A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Werner, Heinrich
1972 Die Tonität der gegenwärtigen jenisseischen Dialekte. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 271. 379–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974 Die Akzentuation der mehrsilbigen Wörter in den gegenwärtigen Jenissej-Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 321. 181–185.Google Scholar
1994 Das Klassensystem in den Jenissej-Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1996 Vergleichende Akzentologie der Jenissej-Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1997a Das Jugische (Sym-Ketische). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1997b Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2002 Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. 31 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2003 M. A. Castrén und die Jenissejistik. Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 19. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2004 Zur jenissejisch-indianischen Urverwandtschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2005 Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Waxenberger, Gaby
2019 Absolute chronology of early sound changes reflected in Pre-Old English runic inscriptions. North-Western European Language Evolution 72(1). 60–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar