Article In:
Diachronica: Online-First Articles

Disappearing iconicity in the evolution of Polish Sign Language

The case of słodki ‘Sweet’

ORCID logo | University of Warsaw

In this article, I look at the evolution of Polish Sign Language by closely analyzing the sign słodki ‘sweet’ at all of the stages of its development known to us. By closing in on just one sign we can see that the evolution of a sign is a very complex process. The sign słodki ‘sweet’ has gradually lost its iconic character over time. This is primarily due to linguistic factors, while societal factors have also impacted the sign’s transparency. Although at its inception słodki ‘sweet’ might have been considered iconic and its meaning transparent, today the sign’s motivation would be unclear to people seeing it for the first time, including to native Polish Sign Language users. The sign has undergone many different processes, such as assimilation, channel clearing, reduction and analogy. These processes are discussed in the article in depth; along with a change in society, they have resulted in the etymology of the sign being unknown to users of Polish Sign Language.

Keywords: Polish Sign Language, PJM, linguistic evolution, sign language, assimilation, reduction, channel clearing, analogy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1History of Polish Sign Language
    • 1.2Polish Sign Language Dictionaries
  • 2.Evolutionary processes in present research
  • 3.Evolution of the sign słodki ‘sweet’
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Abreu, Walber Gonçalves de & Marília de Nazaré de Oliveira Ferreira
2021 Assimilation of Libras signs in joke texts. Sign Language Studies 31, 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula & Edward S. Klima
1976 Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In S. Harnad, D. Hoest & I. Lancaster (eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech, 514–538. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czajkowska-Kisil, Małgorzata
2014 Głusi, ich język i kultura – zarys problematyki [The Deaf, their language and culture – outline of the issues]. In P. Rutkowski & S. Łozińska (eds.), Lingwistyka przestrzeni i ruchu. Komunikacja migowa a metody korpusowe [Linguistics of space and movement. Sign communication and corpus methods], 17–35. Warsaw: Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Farris, Michael A.
1994 Sign language research and Polish Sign Language. Lingua Posnaniensis 361, 13–36.Google Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy
1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51(3), 696–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendzel, Józef K.
1981 Turystyczny słownik języka migowego [Touristic Dictionary of Sign Language]. Warsaw and Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczo-Propagandowy PTTK.Google Scholar
1986 Słownik polskiego języka miganego [Dictionary of Polish Signed Language]. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo „Pojezierze”.Google Scholar
Hollak, Józef & Teofil Jagodziński
1879 Słownik mimiczny dla głuchoniemych i osób z nimi styczność mających [Dictionary of mime for the Deaf-Mute and people having contact with them]. Warsaw: Instytut Głuchoniemych i Ociemniałych.Google Scholar
Kosiba, Olgierd & Piotr Grenda
2011 Leksykon języka migowego [Lexicon of sign language]. Bogatynia, Poland: Wydawnictwo Silentium.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Mateusz
2022 Język migowy formą komunikacji z osobami niepełnosprawnymi słuchowo [Sign language as form of communication with hearing-impaired people]. Resovia Sacra 291, 315–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga & Sylwia Łozińska
2023 In quest of influences of Polish language dictionaries on the oldest Polish Sign Language dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography ecad015. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Schuyler
1918 The sign language: a manual of signs. Iowa City: Athens Press.Google Scholar
Łacheta, Joanna, Małgorzata Czajkowska-Kisil, Jadwiga Linde-Usiekniewicz & Paweł Rutkowski
(eds.) 2016 Korpusowy słownik polskiego języka migowego [Corpus-based dictionary of Polish Sign Language]. Warsaw: Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego [online publication: [URL]].
Pizzuto, Elena & Virginia Volterra
2000 Iconicity and transparency in sign languages: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 261–286. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Power, Justin M.
2020 The origins of Russian-Tajik Sign Language: Investigating the historical sources and transmission of a signed language in Tajikistan. Austin, TX: University of Texas dissertation.
2022 Historical linguistics of sign languages: Progress and problems. Frontiers in Psychology 131:818753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radutzky, Elena J.
1989 La lingua italiana dei segni: Historical change in sign language of Deaf people in Italy. New York: New York University dissertation.
Reagan, Timothy
2021 Historical linguistics and the case for sign language families. Sign Language Studies 41, 427–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruta, Karolina & Marta Wrześniewska-Pietrzak
2014 Rzecz o nieobecnych. O słownikach polskiego języka migowego [On the absent ones. Dictionaries of the Polish Sign Language]. Prace Filologiczne 651, 359–376.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, Paweł & Piotr Mostowski
2017 Polski język migowy narzędziem przeciwdziałania wykluczeniu [Polish Sign Language as a tool in combatting exclusion]. Trendy 11, 18–22.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sarah Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell
2009 Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 211, 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann
1995 The development of Nicaraguan Sign Language via the language acquisition process. Proceedings of Boston University Child Language Development 191, 543–552.Google Scholar
Shaw, Emily & Yves Delaporte
2014 A Historical and Etymological Dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William, Jr., Dorothy Casterline & Carl Croneberg
1965 A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted & Patricia Clark
2015 Sign Language Archaeology: Understanding the Historical Roots of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepankowski, Bogdan
2000 Słownik liturgiczny języka migowego [Liturgical Dictionary of Sign Language]. Katowice, Poland: Księgarnia św. Jacka.Google Scholar
Świdziński, Marek & Paweł Rutkowski
2022 Korpus ogólny jako model danego języka naturalnego: korpusy języków fonicznych a korpus polskiego języka migowego [General corpus as a model of a given natural language: corpuses of spoken languages and corpus of Polish Sign Language]. Poradnik Językowy 31, 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah
2001 Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tazbirówna, Wanda
1950 Uwagi o języku miganym wychowanków Instytutu Głuchoniemych i Ociemniałych w Warszawie [Remarks on the signed language of the students of the Institute for the Deaf-Mute and Blind in Warsaw]. Poradnik Językowy 51, 12–18.Google Scholar
Trębicka-Postrzygacz, Beata
2011 Szkoły dla dzieci niesłyszących na ziemiach polskich w latach 1817–1914 [Schools for deaf children on Polish lands in the years 1817–1914]. Lublin, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.Google Scholar
Twardowska, Ewa
(ed.) 2008 Stan badań nad Polskim Językiem Migowym [State of research on Polish Sign Language]. Łódź: Polski Związek Głuchych Oddział Łódzki.Google Scholar
Wysocki, Wawrzyniec
1836 Pamiętnik o głuchoniemych i metodzie ich uczenia tudzież o tem wszystkiem co tylko do tego przedmiotu ściągać się może [The diary about the Deaf-Mute and the method of teaching them and about everything that can be included in that subject]. Warsaw: Drukarnia Piotra Baryckiego.Google Scholar