Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 26:3 (2009) ► pp. 437441
References
Andersen, Henning
2006 “Synchrony, diachrony, and evolution”. Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and beyond ed. by Ole Nedergaard Thomsen, 59–90. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 2791.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1958/1974 Sincronía, diacronía e historia: El problema del cambio lingüístico . Montevideo: Universidad de la Republica, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Translated by Helga Sohre as Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte: Das Problem des Sprachwandels . Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
1965/1968 “Sincronía, diacronía y tipología”. Actos del XI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística i Filología Románicas, vol. 11, 269–283. Madrid 1965 Translated by Uwe Petersen as “Synchronie, Diachronie und Typologie” in Sprache: Strukturen und Funktionen. XII Aufsätze zur allgemeinen und romanischen Sprachwissenschaft , 91–108. (= Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 21.) Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. (Longman Linguistics Library). Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 “Optimality and diachronic adaptation”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181.180–205.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1990Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989 “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change”. Journal of Language Variation and Change 11.199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna
2003Syntactic Change. Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedergaard Thomsen, Ole
2006 “Towards an integrated functional-pragmatic theory of language and language change: In commemoration of Eugenio Coseriu (1921–2002)”. Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and beyond ed. by Ole Nedergaard Thomsen, 307–338. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 2791.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar