Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 26:3 (2009) ► pp. 448455
References
Campbell, Lyle & Harris Alice C.
2002 “Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’”. Journal of Linguistics 381.599–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crisma, Paola & Giuseppe Longobardi
To appear. “Change, relatedness and inertia in historical syntax”. Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory ed. by Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi Oxford Oxford University Press
Delbrück, Berthold
1878Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem Çatapathabrâhmaṇa. (= Syntaktische Forschungen 31.) Halle/Saale: Verlag des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1971 “Über die Rekonstruktion der indogermanischen Syntax”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 851.5–22.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul
1975Proto-Indo-European Syntax: The order of meaningful elements. (= Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 11.) Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara, Cristina Guardiano & Guiseppe Longobardi
2004 “Historical implications of a formal theory of syntactic variation”. Paper presented at Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference (DIGS) VIII, Yale, June 2004.
Givón, Talmy
2000 “Internal reconstruction: As method, as theory”. Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization ed. by Spike Gildea, 107–159. (= Typological Studies in Language 431.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Language Universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Guardiano, Christina & Longobardi Guiseppe
2005 “Parametric comparison and language taxonomy”. Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation ed. by Monserrat Batllori, Maria L. Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, 149–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark
2003 “Neogrammarian Sound Change”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 343–368. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1983Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva Tanja
2002 “On the evolution of grammatical forms”. The Transition to Language: Studies in the evolution of language ed. by Alison Wray, 376–397. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich
ed. 2002Indogermanische Syntax: Fragen und Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1994 “Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns”. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
2000 “An historical explanation of some binding-theoretic facts in English”. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1974Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2005 “On the methodological bases of genetic language comparison”. Language Research (SNU) 411.379–404.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
2002 “Myths and the prehistory of grammars”. Journal of Linguistics 381.113–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2001 “Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism and Etymology: The history of French chez ”. Linguistic Inquiry 321.275–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “On parameters and parameter theory”. Syntaxtheorien, Modelle, Methoden, Motive ed. by Elisabeth Stark & Ulrich Wandruszka, 273–290. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna
2003Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1974 “Topics, subjects and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX”. Historical Linguistics ed. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, Vol. I1, 339–376. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar