This paper explores the development of third person plural impersonal constructions into passive ones with the aim of determining the conditions most conducive to the emergence of a canonical passive, i.e. one which is both promotional (with an overt lexical subject) and agentive (with an overt agent). On the basis of cross-linguistic data it is argued that the required conditions are, on the one hand, the existence of a morphological alignment which does not distinguish between the O of a transitive clause and the S of a passive one and, on the other hand, the availability of highly grammaticalized third person plural impersonals, i.e. ones which can be used in episodic contexts and with different types of agents, among them individual and specific ones. The documented rarity of promotional passives originating from third person plural impersonal constructions is attributed to the rarity of the coincidence of the above two sets of independent factors.
2012. Who are ‘we’ in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and reference of first person plural subject pronouns. Language Sciences 34:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
2024. Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich: Antipassive: typology, diachrony and related constructions
. Linguistic Typology 28:1 ► pp. 193 ff.
Stauder, Andréas
2023. On the Earlier Egyptian T-Passive: Analysis, Spread, Long-Term History. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :31 ► pp. 185 ff.
Syea, Anand
2024. Absence of syntactic passive in creoles: Evidence from French-based Mauritian Creole. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.