Book review
Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald. Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. . [Trends in Linguistics, 194]. ii, 271 pp.
References (14)
References
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen. 2000. “The grammar of future time reference in European languages”. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 309–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E., & Jackendoff Ray. 2004. “The English resultative as a family of constructions”. Language 801.532–568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juge, Matthew L. 2005. “Unidirectionality in grammaticalization and lexical shift: The case of English rather
”. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 147–154. Berkeley: BLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juge, Matthew L. 2007. “Metaphor and teleology do not drive grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected Papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, 31 July-5 August 2005, ed. by Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith, 33–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, Paul, & Fillmore Charles J.. 1999. “Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? construction”. Language 751.1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiparsky, Paul. Forthcoming. “Grammaticalization as optimization”. The Emergence of Grammaticalization, ed. by Diana Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1998. “On borrowing as a mechanism of syntactic change”. Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives: Selected Papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVII), Irvine, 20–22 February, 1997, ed. by Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel, & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, 225–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Weigel, William F. 2003. “Patterns of borrowing in Yiddish: Light, heavy, and semelfactive verbs”. Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, 4 January 2003.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)