Indefinites, negation and Jespersen’s Cycle in the history of Low German
This paper offers a formal account of the diachronic changes in the interaction between indefinites in the scope of negation and the expression of sentential negation in the history of Low German. Different types of negative concord develop at the different historical stages. Parallel to that, the language underwent Jespersen’s Cycle. In addition, I argue that, against common belief, Jespersen’s Cycle is at best indirectly related to the type of interaction between indefinites and negation. Changes in the type of indefinites used in the scope of negation arise due to changes in the lexical properties of the indefinites involved, not as a result of changes in the expression of negation. Conversely, changes in the type of indefinites do not trigger changes in the expression of negation.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pescarini, Diego
2022.
A Quantitative Approach to Microvariation: Negative Marking in Central Romance.
Languages 7:2
► pp. 87 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2022.
Information structure and OV word order in Old and Middle English: a phase-based approach.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 25:1
► pp. 79 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Meisner, Charlotte, Elisabeth Stark & Harald Völker
2014.
Introduction to the special issue: “Jespersen revisited: Negation in Romance and beyond”.
Lingua 147
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.