Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:2 (2014) ► pp.223–266

The analysis of Westphalian German Spirantization

| Indiana University

Westphalian German Spirantization refers to the change from an original prevocalic long vowel to the corresponding short vowel plus fricative (i.e. [ɣ]). For example, the [ɪɣ] sequence in the Westphalian word [klɪɣə] “bran” derived historically from [iː]. The present article offers a new treatment for the historical shift from [iː] to [ɪɣ] — as well as similar ones involving other vowels — which breaks the process down into five separate changes. It is argued that each of these changes modified non-linear representations involving syllables, moras and segmental features. A crucial component of the proposed analysis is that each of the five changes is seen as a repair to a constraint.

Keywords: Germanic, velarization, glide, spirantization, repair strategies, constraints, coronal, Westphalian German, hiatus
Published online: 5 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.03hal
References
Ahrens, Josef
1908 Der Vokalismus der Mundarten im Kreise Olpe unter Zugrundelegung der Mundart von Elspe. Borna-Leipzig: Noske.Google Scholar
Alber, Birgit
2001 Regional variation and edges: Glottal stop epenthesis and dissimilation in Standard and Southern varieties of German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 201. 3–41.Google Scholar
Alderete, John
2004 Dissimilation as local conjunction. In John McCarthy (ed.), Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, 394–416. Oxford: Blackwell. [Excerpt from Alderete, John. 1997. Dissimilation as local conjunction. NELS 27. 17–32.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alderete, John & Stefan Frisch
2007 Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), Cambridge handbook of phonology, 379–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baertsch, Karen
2002 An optimality theoretic approach to syllable structure: The split margin hierarchy. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Beisenherz, Heinrich
1907 Vokalismus der Mundart des nordöstlichen Landkreises Dortmund. Borna-Leipzig: Noske.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Karl
1981 Über gesprochenes Mittelniederdeutsch. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert
1994 Obstruent epenthesis and the unity of phonological features. Lingua 931. 111–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1995 The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
2005 Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casali, Roderic
1997 Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? Language 731. 493–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968 The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N
1976 Palatalization: Linking or assimilation? Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society 121. 96–109.Google Scholar
1990 The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In John Kingston and Mary Beckman (ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Berber syllabification: Derivations or constraints? In Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 289–330. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2001 Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In T. Alan Hall (ed.), Distinctive feature theory, 71–146. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. & Elizabeth Hume
1995 The internal organization of speech sounds. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail
1992 The consequences of dissimilation in Sundanese. Phonology 91. 199–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Garry & Gregory Iverson
1996 The Verschärfung as feature spread. In Rosina Lippi-Green & Joseph Salmons (eds.), Germanic linguistics: Syntactic and diachronic, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrell, Martin
1989 Westphalian and Eastphalian. In Charles Russ (ed.), The dialects of modern German: A linguistic survey, 59–90. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foerste, William
1957 Geschichte der niederdeutschen Mundarten. In Wolfgang Stammler (ed.), Deutsche Philologie im Aufriss, vol. 11, 2nd edn., 1729–1898. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Grimme, Hubert
1922 Plattdeutsche Mundarten, 2nd edn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guerssel, Mohamed
1986 Glides in Berber and syllabicity. Linguistic Inquiry 171. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Jörg Peters
2005 A tonal analysis of Cologne Schärfung . Phonology 211. 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan
1992 Syllable structure and syllable related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 The phonology of coronals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 The distribution of superheavy syllables in Standard German. The Linguistic Review 191. 377–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Vowel prothesis in Walliser German. Linguistics 49(5). 945–976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan & John Scott
2007 Inflectional paradigms have a base: Evidence from s-dissimilation in southern German dialects. Morphology 17(1). 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1986 Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 621. 321–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 201. 253–306.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E
1887 Die Vocale der Lippischen Mundart. Hannover: Helwingsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand
1886 Die Soester Mundart. Norden: Diedrich Soltau.Google Scholar
1921 Altsächsisches Elementarbuch, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth
1992 Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in non-linear phonology. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester
1999 Realignment. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface, 188–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen
1992 Can [consonantal] spread? Language 681. 313–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Ongmi
1999 A correspondence analysis on hiatus resolution in Korean. Rutgers Optimality Archives: ROA-375.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “Elsewhere” in phonology. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert
2000 The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1967 The Germanic Verschärfung . Language 431. 445–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Vincent Evers
1991 Palatalization and coronality. In Carole Paradis & Jean-François Prunet (eds.), The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence, 79–100. San Diego: Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasch, Agathe
1914 Mittelniederdeutsche Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah
2011 Glides. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. [URL]. (21 February, 2012) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Juliette
1985 A metrical theory of syllabicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Leys, Odo
1963 Synkope en regressie in het Vlamms en het Nederduits. Mededelingen van de Vereiniging voor Naamkunde te Leuven en de Commissie voor Naamkunde te Amsterdam 391. 120–150.Google Scholar
Möller, Reinhold
1960 Zur Entwicklung der altsächsischen kurzen Vokale in offener Silbe vor intervokalisch ausgefallenem d in westfällischen Mundarten. In William Foerste (ed.), Niederdeutsche Studien 61, 24–46. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Mortensen, David
2004 The emergence of dorsal stops after high vowels in Huishu. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 301. 292–303.
2012 The emergence of obstruents after high vowels. Diachronica 29(4). 434–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert & Theo Vennemann
1983 Sound change and syllable structure: Problems in Germanic phonology. Language 591. 514–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niebaum, Hermann
1974 Zur synchronischen und historischen Phonologie des Westfälischen: Die Mundart von Laer (Landkreis Osnabrück). Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
1977 Westfälisch. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Noske, Manuela
1997 Feature spreading as dealignment: The distribution of [ç] and [x] in German. Phonology 141. 221–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, B. Richard
1999 The Germanic Verschärfung as prosodic change. Diachronica 161. 297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole
1988 On constraints and repair strategies. The Linguistic Review 61. 71–97.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar
1949 A West Germanic reflex of the Verschärfung . Language 251. 182–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
2004 Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reed, Carroll
1959 The structural dialectology of hiatus consonants in German dialects. Orbis 81. 143–148.Google Scholar
Robinson, Orrin
1992 Old English and its closest relatives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth
1986 The representations of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, V.M
1962 Deutsche Mundartkunde: Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schophaus, Renate
2003 Zur Lautentwicklung im Hiat in den westfälischen Mundarten. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar
1982 Der Übergang von idg. -w- zu germ. -k- und -g-. Indogermanische Forschungen 871. 172–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2011 Kluge: Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 25th edn. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982 On the major class features and syllable theory. In Mark Aronoff, Richard Oehrle, Frances Kelley & Bonnie Wilker (eds.), Language sound structure, 107–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer
2003 Onset sonority constraints and subsyllabic structure. Rutgers Optimality Archives [ROA] 608–703.Google Scholar
Stallcup, Kenneth
1978 A comparative perspective on the phonology and noun classification of three Cameroon Grassfields Bantu languages: Moghamo, Ngie and Oshie. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro
1998 A typological investigation of dissimilation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Seiichi
1990 The Germanic Verschärfung: A syllabic perspective. Journal of Indo-European Studies 191. 163–190.Google Scholar
Tita, Fritz
1965 Die Bublitzer Mundart. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard
1987 The sounds of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uffmann, Christian
2007 Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants. Language Sciences 291. 451–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1988 Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard
1996 The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
1970 Phonetisch-phonologische Untersuchungen zur Vokalentwicklung in den deutschen Dialekten, vol. 1: Die Langvokale im Hochdeutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wortmann, Felix
1953 [2003] Zur Lautentwicklung im Hiat in den westfälischen Mundarten. Paper presented at the 66th annual meeting of the Verein für Niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, Osnabrück. [In: Schophaus 2003: Appendix 2: 203–212.]
Yar-Shater, Ehsan
1969 A grammar of Southern Tati dialects. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1988 The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1). 65–100.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pierce, Marc
2020. Review of Goblirsch (2018): Gemination, Lenition, and Vowel Lengthening. On the History of Quantity in Germanic. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 73:2 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.