Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:3 (2014) ► pp.299–336

On the development of Korean SAY evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
| Hong Kong Polytechnic University

This paper examines the development of five hearsay evidential markers in Korean, namely, tako, tamye, tamyense, tanun and tanta, and traces their extended pragmatic functions in discourse. We first identify their functions over time, from Middle Korean to Modern and Contemporary Korean, then quantitatively analyze the usage frequency of these functions, diachronically from the 16th century to the early 20th century using the UNICONC historical corpus, and synchronically in present-day Korean using the Sejong contemporary written and spoken corpus. From a pragmatic perspective, we examine how Korean speakers use these hearsay evidential markers to convey the interpersonal and intersubjective stances of interlocutors in natural conversations. Based on the differential rates of grammaticalization of these markers, and on their usage frequency, we also examine the relationship between evidentiality marking and finiteness; more specifically, we analyze the sequences and mechanisms of change whereby different types of non-finite evidential structures develop into finite evidential constructions. Our findings have broader theoretical and crosslinguistic implications for understanding the mechanisms of insubordination, whereby dependent structures become independent, and whereby lexically transparent constructions develop into grammaticalized markers of speakers’ stance.

Keywords: hearsay evidential markers, epistemic strength, phonological reduction, diachronic corpus analysis, finiteness, verbal elision, main-clause ellipsis, insubordination
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.3.01ahn
References
Ahn, Ju-Ho
2006 A studying of connecting ending -meyenseo in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 451. 179–198.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M.W. Dixon
2003 Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Randy J. LaPolla
2007 New perspectives on evidentials: A view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B
1986 Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2007 Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 115–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1987 Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 256–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chang, Miao-Hsia
1998 The discourse functions of Taiwanese kong in relation to its grammaticalization. In Huang Shuanfan (ed.), Selected papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 111–127. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
2008 Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12(1). 45–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Kyung-Sook
2006 Korean evidentials and assertion. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 105–113. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Chui, Kawai
1994 Grammaticalization of the saying verb wa in Cantonese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 51. 1–13.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
1996 Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 261. 475–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, Lena & Carita Paradis
2009 Editorial: Evidentiality in language and cognition. Functions of Language 16(1). 5–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006 Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002 Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A
2001 Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2). 167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Sonja
2011 Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakará: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institut für Psycholinguistik.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Lewis. R
1981 Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Alan Wheeler (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology 11, 141–165. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2008 Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen
2011 Innovation in nominalization in Magar, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Asian perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 215–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, Tom & Manfred von Roncador
2002 Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Jacqueline Visconti
2007 On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds.), Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, 137–171. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd &Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 11, 149–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane & Judith Irvine
(eds.) 1993 Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horie, Kaoru
2012 The convergence of stance-related functions of nominalization in Modern Japanese. Paper presented at the Workshop on Stance and Discourse: Discourse Perspectives, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, May 7-9.
Hsieh, Fuhui
2012 On the grammaticalization of the Kavalan SAY verb zin . Oceanic Linguistics 51(2). 467–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeon, Hye-Young
1996 On pragmatic functions of ‘-tako’-ending repercussive question. Korean Journal of Linguistics 21(3). 889–911.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Bo Utas
2000 Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mary Shin
2006 Evidential strategies in Korean conversation: An analysis of interactional and conversational narrative functions. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
2011 Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker -tamye . Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Minju
2011 Grammaticalization in Korean: The evolution of the existential verb. London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Su Tae
2005 Machimpep Ssikkutyuy Yunghapkwa Ku Hankyey [Fusion of sentential endings and its limit] . Seoul: Pakiceng Publishing.Google Scholar
Konoshima, Masatoshi
1973 Kokugo Joshi no Kenkyuu [A study of particles in Japanese] . Tokyo: Oofuusha.Google Scholar
Kwon, Iksoo
2009 The Korean evidential marker -te- revisited: Its semantic constraints and distancing effects. Paper presented at the Discourse Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea Conference, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, June 20.
Larrivée, Pierre
2011 The role of pragmatics in grammatical change: The case of French preverbal non . Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1987–1996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jungmee
2010 The Korean evidential -te: A modal analysis. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 81. 287–311.Google Scholar
Lee, Keum-Hee
2006 Grammaticalization of quotation constructions: On the process and degree of grammaticalization. Kwukehak [Korean Lingustics] 481. 233–258.Google Scholar
Leung, Wai-mun
2006 On the synchrony and diachrony of sentence final particles: The case of wo in Cantonese. Pokfulam, HK: University of Hong Kong dissertation.Google Scholar
2009 A study of the Cantonese hearsay particle wo from a tonal perspective. International Journal of Linguistics 1(1). 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Dongsik
2010 Evidentials and interrogatives: A case study from Korean. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen
1998 Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5! Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics. 325–334. Academica Sinica.
Michael, Lev
2008 Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Miura, Akira
1974 ‘To’ to ‘tte’ [To and tte]. Nihonggo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education] 241. 23–28.Google Scholar
Nam, Mi-jeong
2010 The formation and meaning of an ending “-dago” and its kind. Hanmalyenku [Studies on Korean Language] 261. 109–131.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2010 Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12). 1176–1189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997 Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001 Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Jinho
2008 ‘tako’ lyu emiey tayhan hwayongloncek cepkun [Sentential ending ‘tako’ from a pragmatic approach]. Yeysan Hakpo [Yeysan Studies] 241. 171–194.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2008a Ellipsis and functional shifts. Studies in Modern Grammar 521. 169–194.Google Scholar
2008b On the rise and fall of Korean nominalizers. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 76), 239–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Analogy-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence-final markers from concomitance-connectives. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology , University of Hong Kong, July 22.
Rudolph, Dina
1993 Getting past politeness: The role of linguistic markers of evidentiality and informational domains in Japanese student-teacher interactions at the graduate level. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Saegusa, Reiko
1997 Syntax of tte . Gengo Bunka 341. 21–34.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A
2006 Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Chung-kon & Keon-hee Kim
2011 The modal inquiry into the construction of bound noun + -ida . Emwunyenkwu [Korean Sentence Structure Studies] 681. 79–102.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Mi Kyong
2005 Development of nominalizers in some East Asian languages. Shatin: The Chinese University of Hong Kong MA thesis. Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock
2011 Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 181. 126–143.Google Scholar
2012 Development of stance markers in Korean: Diachronic and discourse perspectives. Paper presented at the Tutorial on Discourse Analysis (Workshop on Epistemicity, Evidentiality and Attitude), Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Sept 2.
Su, Lily I-wen
2004 Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30(1). 19–40.Google Scholar
Sun, Tianshin Jackson
1993 Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(64). 945–1001.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko
1999 Marker of unexpected statements: An analysis of the quotative particle datte . Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33(1). 44–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamaji, Mizuho & Foong Ha Yap
Manuscript. On the role of phonological change and ellipsis in the development of evidential and pragmatic markers: Diachronic evidence from converbal ‘say’ constructions in Japanese. Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies and Department of English, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Wang, Yu-Fang, Aya Katz & Chih-Hua Chen
2003 Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25(5). 457‒488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, David
2008 Nominalization in Kiranti and the Central Himalayish languages of Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2). 1–43.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121. 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
2011 Evidentiality and counterexpectation marking strategies in Cantonese and Korean. Paper presented at the Workshop on Evidentiality and Mood, Seoul National University, October 19.
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Härsta & Janick Wrona
(eds.) 2011 Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Stephen Matthews
2008 The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 76), 309–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Ying Yang & Tak-sum Wong
Forthcoming. On the development of sentence final particles (and utterance tags) in Chinese. In Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.) Asymmetrical functions at the left and right periphery Leiden Brill DOI logo
Yeung, Ka-Wai
2006 On the status of the complementizer waa6 in Cantonese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(1). 1–48.Google Scholar
Yu, Hyeon Gyeong
2002 Emi ‘-tako’ uymiwa yongpep [The meaning and usage of particle tako]. Paytalmal [Ethnic Korean] 311. 99–122.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, Kookichiroo
1954 Edokotoba no Kenkyuu [A study of language in the Edo period] . Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Ahn, Mikyung
2016. Emotion in interaction. Studies in Language 40:4 ► pp. 872 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua 274 ► pp. 103230 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Evidentiality in interaction. Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Chapter 9. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kalt, Susan E.
2021. Acquisition, Loss and Innovation in Chuquisaca Quechua—What Happened to Evidential Marking?. Languages 6:2 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Mary Shin
2015. Stancetaking in the face of incongruity in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2015. On the emergence of Korean markers of agreement. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Tamaji, Mizuho
2022. Development of ‘say’-derived constructions. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Complex Clauses. In Korean Syntax and Semantics, ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.