This paper examines the development of five hearsay evidential markers in Korean, namely, tako, tamye, tamyense, tanun and tanta, and traces their extended pragmatic functions in discourse. We first identify their functions over time, from Middle Korean to Modern and Contemporary Korean, then quantitatively analyze the usage frequency of these functions, diachronically from the 16th century to the early 20th century using the UNICONC historical corpus, and synchronically in present-day Korean using the Sejong contemporary written and spoken corpus. From a pragmatic perspective, we examine how Korean speakers use these hearsay evidential markers to convey the interpersonal and intersubjective stances of interlocutors in natural conversations. Based on the differential rates of grammaticalization of these markers, and on their usage frequency, we also examine the relationship between evidentiality marking and finiteness; more specifically, we analyze the sequences and mechanisms of change whereby different types of non-finite evidential structures develop into finite evidential constructions. Our findings have broader theoretical and crosslinguistic implications for understanding the mechanisms of insubordination, whereby dependent structures become independent, and whereby lexically transparent constructions develop into grammaticalized markers of speakers’ stance.
2007New perspectives on evidentials: A view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16.
Anderson, Lloyd B
1986Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2007Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 115–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1987Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 256–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols
(eds.)1986Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
1998The discourse functions of Taiwanese kong in relation to its grammaticalization. In Huang Shuanfan (ed.), Selected papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 111–127. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.
2008Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12(1). 45–98.
2006Korean evidentials and assertion. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 105–113. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
1994Grammaticalization of the saying verb wa in Cantonese. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 51. 1–13.
2007On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds.), Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, 137–171. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Heine, Bernd &Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(eds.)1993Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2012The convergence of stance-related functions of nominalization in Modern Japanese. Paper presented at the Workshop on Stance and Discourse: Discourse Perspectives, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, May 7-9.
2012On the grammaticalization of the Kavalan SAY verb zin. Oceanic Linguistics 51(2). 467–492.
1996On pragmatic functions of ‘-tako’-ending repercussive question. Korean Journal of Linguistics 21(3). 889–911.
Johanson, Lars & Bo Utas
2000Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, Mary Shin
2006Evidential strategies in Korean conversation: An analysis of interactional and conversational narrative functions. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
Kim, Mary Shin
2011Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker -tamye. Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459.
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The evolution of the existential verb. London: Saffron Books.
Kim, Su Tae
2005Machimpep Ssikkutyuy Yunghapkwa Ku Hankyey[Fusion of sentential endings and its limit]. Seoul: Pakiceng Publishing.
1973Kokugo Joshi no Kenkyuu[A study of particles in Japanese]. Tokyo: Oofuusha.
2009The Korean evidential marker -te- revisited: Its semantic constraints and distancing effects. Paper presented at the Discourse Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea Conference, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, June 20.
2011The role of pragmatics in grammatical change: The case of French preverbal non. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1987–1996.
2010The Korean evidential -te: A modal analysis. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 81. 287–311.
2006Grammaticalization of quotation constructions: On the process and degree of grammaticalization. Kwukehak[Korean Lingustics] 481. 233–258.
2006On the synchrony and diachrony of sentence final particles: The case of wo in Cantonese. Pokfulam, HK: University of Hong Kong dissertation.
2009A study of the Cantonese hearsay particle wo from a tonal perspective. International Journal of Linguistics 1(1). 1–14.
2010Evidentials and interrogatives: A case study from Korean. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
1998Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5! Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics. 325–334. Academica Sinica.
2008Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
1974‘To’ to ‘tte’ [To and tte]. Nihonggo Kyooiku[Japanese Language Education] 241. 23–28.
2010The formation and meaning of an ending “-dago” and its kind. Hanmalyenku[Studies on Korean Language] 261. 109–131.
2010Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12). 1176–1189.
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2001Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400.
2008‘tako’ lyu emiey tayhan hwayongloncek cepkun [Sentential ending ‘tako’ from a pragmatic approach]. Yeysan Hakpo[Yeysan Studies] 241. 171–194.
2008aEllipsis and functional shifts. Studies in Modern Grammar 521. 169–194.
2008bOn the rise and fall of Korean nominalizers. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 76), 239–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011Analogy-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence-final markers from concomitance-connectives. Paper presented at the
9th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology
, University of Hong Kong, July 22.
1993Getting past politeness: The role of linguistic markers of evidentiality and informational domains in Japanese student-teacher interactions at the graduate level. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
1997Syntax of tte. Gengo Bunka 341. 21–34.
Schwenter, Scott A
2006Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shi, Chung-kon & Keon-hee Kim
2011The modal inquiry into the construction of bound noun + -ida. Emwunyenkwu[Korean Sentence Structure Studies] 681. 79–102.
1990The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shin, Mi Kyong
2005Development of nominalizers in some East Asian languages. Shatin: The Chinese University of Hong Kong MA thesis.
2011Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 181. 126–143.
2012Development of stance markers in Korean: Diachronic and discourse perspectives. Paper presented at the Tutorial on Discourse Analysis (Workshop on Epistemicity, Evidentiality and Attitude), Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Sept 2.
Su, Lily I-wen
2004Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30(1). 19–40.
Sun, Tianshin Jackson
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(64). 945–1001.
1999Marker of unexpected statements: An analysis of the quotative particle datte. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33(1). 44–67.
Tamaji, Mizuho & Foong Ha Yap
Manuscript. On the role of phonological change and ellipsis in the development of evidential and pragmatic markers: Diachronic evidence from converbal ‘say’ constructions in Japanese. Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies and Department of English, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Wang, Yu-Fang, Aya Katz & Chih-Hua Chen
2003Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25(5). 457‒488.
2008Nominalization in Kiranti and the Central Himalayish languages of Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2). 1–43.
2019. Complex Clauses. In Korean Syntax and Semantics, ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.